|
Post by hopemax on Jul 1, 2024 19:26:56 GMT
He doesn't need to be in office another 4 years. The country has faced this issue before. FDR didn't even make it 3 months into his 4th term, before he died. Something the party had prepared for by replacing his VP for the 4th term with Harry Truman, because his previous VP (Henry Wallace) was not viewed as an adequate successor. I love Joe Biden, but he isn't FDR. And we live in a very different world than 1944. Many in the general public do not view Kamala Harris as an adequate successor. So what then? If you or they believe that a 2nd Trump term is "the lesser of two evils," in this situation, then you and they can do nothing. Stay at home, not vote. The option of picking someone else required work to be done in year 1, 2 and 3 of Biden's presidency. Work that didn't happen, because too many people put faith in the Judicial system and other citizens that Trump would go away or be proven unviable. The fact that that *didn't* happen, makes the case that a whole bunch of options *won't* work, and how perilous a state our democracy is in. Enough citizens are really okay with a Trump 2nd term over the Constitutional option of Biden winning, dying / resigning and Harris taking over or Biden serving out his term, or even something like Biden's team running a shadowy government like Reagan's 2nd term to cover for an incapacitated president (if someone believes this is what is going on.) Trying to grasp for other options is a coping mechanism, not a viable solution. There is no "break glass in case of emergency" option here.
|
|
|
Post by workingclassdog on Jul 1, 2024 19:39:19 GMT
I'm not a political person at all, but I think it's too late at this point.
|
|
jayfab
Drama Llama
procastinating
Posts: 5,615
Jun 26, 2014 21:55:15 GMT
|
Post by jayfab on Jul 1, 2024 19:52:30 GMT
after the supreme court just justified an imperial presidency, we must campaign harder for all democrats.. at all levels. Yes! I was pretty bummed all weekend now this ruling by the s court makes it imperative Pres Biden wins.
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Jul 1, 2024 20:06:54 GMT
As I said elsewhere, just SAY you are okay with a 2nd term for Donald Trump, his team, and all that it implies. Or give a specific name who is a viable replacement. Biden isn't acceptable. Now VP Harris is unacceptable. We will be doing this all day. Pete Buttigieg will be unacceptable (gay, his tenure as Transportation Secretary hasn't made waves as being media splashingly successful - although it is probably more effective in quiet ways), Gov. Newsom is too easy of a target to the Trump MAGA campaign style, Gov. Whitmer (woman, unknown in states that are necessary like AZ and GA), Gov Pritzker (too billionaire), others are too brown, have ovaries, too woke to WIN OVER the undecideds who by still being undecided are giving implicit approval to a 2nd Trump term. I'm not at all okay with a Trump 2nd term which is exactly why Biden must be replaced. As I said, a governor of a swing state would be far better than Biden at this point - Whitmer or Shapiro. Yes, there are problems with every candidate, but we can win with a younger, energetic moderate Democrat. We can not win with the current ticket. Leaving Biden on the ticket is what is saying Yes to a Trump 2nd term. Ok, let’s see if I have this straight. Primary season is over so if the President should decide to step aside for “younger energetic” candidate that would mean there would be an open convention where the Democratic Nominee would be select by a small group of individuals and not by a majority of Democratic voters. Talk about giving voters a reason for staying home and not voting. Now for me I think, at this point in time, we need a president with a lot of experience in both domestic and foreign affairs. We need a president that can get things done. We need a president that is open to all items put before him, both moderate and progressive. We need a president that can still get things done in spite of the antics by those supposedly Democratic Senators Manchin & Sinema. Yes Joe Biden is old, he walks funny, sometimes his stutter gets the better of him and yes he had a bad night. And he has all of the above. And IMO that is what we need at this point of time.
|
|
|
Post by hopemax on Jul 1, 2024 20:21:20 GMT
As I said elsewhere, just SAY you are okay with a 2nd term for Donald Trump, his team, and all that it implies. Or give a specific name who is a viable replacement. Biden isn't acceptable. Now VP Harris is unacceptable. We will be doing this all day. Pete Buttigieg will be unacceptable (gay, his tenure as Transportation Secretary hasn't made waves as being media splashingly successful - although it is probably more effective in quiet ways), Gov. Newsom is too easy of a target to the Trump MAGA campaign style, Gov. Whitmer (woman, unknown in states that are necessary like AZ and GA), Gov Pritzker (too billionaire), others are too brown, have ovaries, too woke to WIN OVER the undecideds who by still being undecided are giving implicit approval to a 2nd Trump term. I'm not at all okay with a Trump 2nd term which is exactly why Biden must be replaced. As I said, a governor of a swing state would be far better than Biden at this point - Whitmer or Shapiro. Yes, there are problems with every candidate, but we can win with a younger, energetic moderate Democrat. We can not win with the current ticket. Leaving Biden on the ticket is what is saying Yes to a Trump 2nd term. I try to keep up on politics, and I had to Google Shapiro to know who he was. How is he going to break into the consciousness of an undecided voter in AZ, NV, GA? Is a Jewish governor really going to appease the leftists who are up in arms over Biden's handling of Gaza? Matthew 16:26 or the musical 1776's reinterpretation "what is a man profited if he shall gain Maryland and lose the entire South?" is ringing through my head here. Michigan is necessary, and if that state is on as razor thin an edge as it seems over Gaza, which Trump state does he flip to compensate? So go with Whitmer, and lose in AZ and GA because ovaries and woke. The polling that exists does not show *any* of the other Democratic names beating Donald Trump. Biden is still the one that gets the closest. So while you may believe your last sentence, it doesn't make it the reality, no matter how much anyone wants to believe it will. Second is Harris. Which still is what happens if Biden can't fulfill his term. And as mentioned above, how will voters react to a change made in this manner? Dump the primary process results because undecideds need to be catered to over everyone else and so many others are already saying they are okay with Trump? I really wish people would examine all of this beyond their own, "I need to feel good about my choice." There are real opportunity costs, besides the opportunity costs of sticking with Biden.
|
|
gottapeanow
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,828
Jun 25, 2014 20:56:09 GMT
|
Post by gottapeanow on Jul 1, 2024 20:36:02 GMT
My son, age 25 and registered D, says yes.
He called Trump the felon geriatric and Biden the geriatric geriatric.
Lisa
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Jul 1, 2024 20:44:45 GMT
My son, age 25 and registered D, says yes. He called Trump the felon geriatric and Biden the geriatric geriatric. Lisa My 21 and 23 year olds will still be voting for Biden. Here in Texas, we have a front row view to what Rs intend for the whole country if Trump is elected. They understand what is at stake. We have to make young people in blue states who haven't yet felt the oppression of the religious right understand what is at stake for them, too.
|
|
|
Post by lisae on Jul 1, 2024 20:55:34 GMT
I try to keep up on politics, and I had to Google Shapiro to know who he was. How is he going to break into the consciousness of an undecided voter in AZ, NV, GA? Is a Jewish governor really going to appease the leftists who are up in arms over Biden's handling of Gaza? Matthew 16:26 or the musical 1776's reinterpretation "what is a man profited if he shall gain Maryland and lose the entire South?" is ringing through my head here. Michigan is necessary, and if that state is on as razor thin an edge as it seems over Gaza, which Trump state does he flip to compensate? So go with Whitmer, and lose in AZ and GA because ovaries and woke. The polling that exists does not show *any* of the other Democratic names beating Donald Trump. Biden is still the one that gets the closest. So while you may believe your last sentence, it doesn't make it the reality, no matter how much anyone wants to believe it will. Second is Harris. Which still is what happens if Biden can't fulfill his term. And as mentioned above, how will voters react to a change made in this manner? Dump the primary process results because undecideds need to be catered to over everyone else and so many others are already saying they are okay with Trump? I really wish people would examine all of this beyond their own, "I need to feel good about my choice." There are real opportunity costs, besides the opportunity costs of sticking with Biden. The primary process was dumped by Biden when he chose to run for reelection at the age of 81. We never had a choice this cycle. Polls about people who have not been introduced to the voters will change. While nominating someone new at the convention leaves us with a short election cycle, it is still time to raise the profile of any of the possible contenders. European countries have short election cycles. Do you really believe anyone who is currently planning to vote for Biden will switch to Trump or stay home if we change to another Democrat? We would pick up voters with a change. Age isn't Biden's only issue. It's my only issue with him but many people blame him for inflation. They are wrong imo but it is still an issue for Biden. Georgia is already lost to Biden. I live in the south, and it will be a red sweep. I'm just hoping our tradition of electing Democratic governors even when we choose a Republican for president holds true because we have a truly terrible Republican nominee for governor. It isn't just me who believes that Biden will cost us the election. It is every poll and a great many political analysts. Big donors are concerned too. I hope if he stays in the race that I am wrong. I will certainly vote for him though it will be with resentment and not admiration this go round.
|
|
|
Post by disneypal on Jul 1, 2024 20:56:24 GMT
My belief is an open convention would be chaotic and all but guarantee trump bring elected. What do you think? I agree
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Jul 1, 2024 21:10:02 GMT
|
|
|
Post by mollycoddle on Jul 1, 2024 21:16:22 GMT
My belief is an open convention would be chaotic and all but guarantee trump bring elected. What do you think? I agree 100%. There will be a battle between Harris supporters and whatever young governor the pundits want. And we would look like fools.
|
|
|
Post by mom2jnk on Jul 1, 2024 21:42:43 GMT
So, genuinely curious then, where do you get your national and international news from? Where do you find truly unbiased political coverage? Serious question... The Economist has published countless articles and features detailing exactly what devastating effects Trump's re-election would have on our nation and the entire world. They have been sounding the alarm bell for a very long time. It's not generally a matter of the veracity of NYT's articles. It's the editorial choices about frequency and positioning of coverage, which has seemed very tilted against Democratic candidates for years now. I have to ask myself why the Economist has called for Biden to step down because of one bad night, when they have never done so for all the rallies where Trump has rambled incoherently, all the times his advisors have been convicted of crimes performed in his service, the insurrection he instigated and directed, or the 34 felonies for which he was convicted. How much credibility can they really have in asking Biden to step down in that case? My point in all of that is that it's not Dems sounding the alarm. It was initially some media of questionable intent, and MAGA jumped right up to amplify their message and make scary-sounding claims like this one: x.com/Alyssafarah/status/1807392958779375946This woman is a MAGA operative and the daughter of the World Net Daily conspiracy rag founder/owner. The likelihood that she even has "numerous friends who are lifelong Democrats" is vanishingly small, particularly in the wake of the 2016 election. And it's people like her who are sounding the "alarm" about voters jumping ship. Don't drink the Koolaid. I assure you that I'm not drinking that kind of Kool-Aid, nor any other kind. How much more do you want the Economist to denounce Trump? "Trump poses the biggest danger to the world in 2024" I don't get it. But I asked a question that I honestly would love an answer... So, genuinely curious then, where do you get your national and international news from? Where do you find truly unbiased political coverage? Serious question...
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Jul 1, 2024 23:22:53 GMT
It's not generally a matter of the veracity of NYT's articles. It's the editorial choices about frequency and positioning of coverage, which has seemed very tilted against Democratic candidates for years now. I have to ask myself why the Economist has called for Biden to step down because of one bad night, when they have never done so for all the rallies where Trump has rambled incoherently, all the times his advisors have been convicted of crimes performed in his service, the insurrection he instigated and directed, or the 34 felonies for which he was convicted. How much credibility can they really have in asking Biden to step down in that case? My point in all of that is that it's not Dems sounding the alarm. It was initially some media of questionable intent, and MAGA jumped right up to amplify their message and make scary-sounding claims like this one: x.com/Alyssafarah/status/1807392958779375946This woman is a MAGA operative and the daughter of the World Net Daily conspiracy rag founder/owner. The likelihood that she even has "numerous friends who are lifelong Democrats" is vanishingly small, particularly in the wake of the 2016 election. And it's people like her who are sounding the "alarm" about voters jumping ship. Don't drink the Koolaid. I assure you that I'm not drinking that kind of Kool-Aid, nor any other kind. How much more do you want the Economist to denounce Trump? "Trump poses the biggest danger to the world in 2024" I don't get it. But I asked a question that I honestly would love an answer... So, genuinely curious then, where do you get your national and international news from? Where do you find truly unbiased political coverage? Serious question... No such thing. I can take most NYT articles for what they’re worth - a generally reliable source of information - while still being annoyed at the way their editorial board frequently bats for the other team in an effort to seem even-handed. Same with NPR and WaPo. Contrary to what the right would have us think, the legacy media outlets are not just spouting left wing propaganda. They are frequently reporting what Trump and his people say without comment or criticism, as CNN did with all Trump’s lies during the debate. And they are verrrrry careful to criticize the left often because they’re still playing “pick me” with right wing voters - which is a fool’s errand.
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Jul 2, 2024 4:09:12 GMT
|
|
|
Post by mollycoddle on Jul 2, 2024 10:12:38 GMT
I try to keep up on politics, and I had to Google Shapiro to know who he was. How is he going to break into the consciousness of an undecided voter in AZ, NV, GA? Is a Jewish governor really going to appease the leftists who are up in arms over Biden's handling of Gaza? Matthew 16:26 or the musical 1776's reinterpretation "what is a man profited if he shall gain Maryland and lose the entire South?" is ringing through my head here. Michigan is necessary, and if that state is on as razor thin an edge as it seems over Gaza, which Trump state does he flip to compensate? So go with Whitmer, and lose in AZ and GA because ovaries and woke. The polling that exists does not show *any* of the other Democratic names beating Donald Trump. Biden is still the one that gets the closest. So while you may believe your last sentence, it doesn't make it the reality, no matter how much anyone wants to believe it will. Second is Harris. Which still is what happens if Biden can't fulfill his term. And as mentioned above, how will voters react to a change made in this manner? Dump the primary process results because undecideds need to be catered to over everyone else and so many others are already saying they are okay with Trump? I really wish people would examine all of this beyond their own, "I need to feel good about my choice." There are real opportunity costs, besides the opportunity costs of sticking with Biden. The primary process was dumped by Biden when he chose to run for reelection at the age of 81. We never had a choice this cycle. Polls about people who have not been introduced to the voters will change. While nominating someone new at the convention leaves us with a short election cycle, it is still time to raise the profile of any of the possible contenders. European countries have short election cycles. Do you really believe anyone who is currently planning to vote for Biden will switch to Trump or stay home if we change to another Democrat? We would pick up voters with a change. Age isn't Biden's only issue. It's my only issue with him but many people blame him for inflation. They are wrong imo but it is still an issue for Biden. Georgia is already lost to Biden. I live in the south, and it will be a red sweep. I'm just hoping our tradition of electing Democratic governors even when we choose a Republican for president holds true because we have a truly terrible Republican nominee for governor. It isn't just me who believes that Biden will cost us the election. It is every poll and a great many political analysts. Big donors are concerned too. I hope if he stays in the race that I am wrong. I will certainly vote for him though it will be with resentment and not admiration this go round. I worry that we might be screwed no matter who runs. If only this replacement discussion had happened a year ago. There is no good answer at the moment. All I can do is to work and vote for whoever the nominee is, and hope that people are smart enough to see that Trump is really the one who has mentally lost ground since even 2020. If you listen to Trump now, and compare to clips from 2016 or 2020, he has trouble keeping a coherent thought in his head. Oh well, there is nothing to be done except to do the work and hope that people realize how dangerous he is. Now I’m venting, I guess. Sorry about that.
|
|
|
Post by nightnurse on Jul 2, 2024 12:47:18 GMT
I despise that the question is “should Biden drop out” and not “should the republicans replace a convicted felon” but I know why. The dems have a little integrity left, the republicans only care about winning and imposing their will. For that reason alone, II would vote blue.
|
|
|
Post by crazy4scraps on Jul 2, 2024 15:59:48 GMT
Democrats have been recently winning special elections that we normally would not be competitive in. They recently over-performed in a district in Pennsylvania where we lost badly four years ago. Abortion is proving to be a motivating issue and we should be hammering the Republicans on that. Elections are real results - polls are not. Louder please for the people in the back!
|
|
|
Post by crazy4scraps on Jul 2, 2024 16:16:58 GMT
No. At this point there isn’t nearly enough time for a new candidate to raise enough funds to compete with the orange convicted felon. I agree that the question should be why isn’t anyone asking for Trump to step down?
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Jul 2, 2024 20:56:15 GMT
He has a point.
Aaron Rupar…
”Nobody loves that Joe Biden is 81. It would be great if he was 35. But you know what I really dislike? Authoritarianism. So I humbly beseech people to get a goddamn grip.”
|
|
|
Post by epeanymous on Jul 2, 2024 21:30:17 GMT
I absolutely hate this but I think any alternative ship sailed.
|
|
|
Post by gar on Jul 3, 2024 15:55:34 GMT
Looks like he's not so sure himself whether he'll continue... Sky News
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Jul 3, 2024 16:13:18 GMT
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Jul 3, 2024 16:15:35 GMT
Looks like he's not so sure himself whether he'll continue... Sky NewsWhen it comes to The NY Times anything they say about the president is suspect.
|
|
|
Post by gar on Jul 3, 2024 16:20:48 GMT
Looks like he's not so sure himself whether he'll continue... Sky NewsWhen it comes to The NY Times anything they say about the president is suspect. Noted.
|
|
lindas
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,305
Jun 26, 2014 5:46:37 GMT
|
Post by lindas on Jul 3, 2024 16:49:09 GMT
Looks like he's not so sure himself whether he'll continue... Sky NewsWhen it comes to The NY Times anything they say about the president is suspect. Only considered suspect by liberals when they’re not kissing Biden and the democrats asses.
|
|
dawnnikol
Prolific Pea
'A life without books is a life not lived.' Jay Kristoff
Posts: 8,552
Sept 21, 2015 18:39:25 GMT
|
Post by dawnnikol on Jul 3, 2024 17:32:41 GMT
This isn't even up to date, but says enough:
|
|
|
Post by hopemax on Jul 3, 2024 17:40:16 GMT
Looks like he's not so sure himself whether he'll continue... Sky NewsMy interpretation of this news is that he made a comment of what he will be permitted to do, which is not the same as his actual state. NBC News frames the conversation as 'President Joe Biden told a key ally that he may not be able to stay in the race against former President Donald Trump if he cannot prove he is up to the job, The New York Times first reported." A. This sort of comment shows awareness of the gravity of the situation. B. A willingness to step aside if that is what the Democratic apparatus and his family wants him to do C. The other candidate does not demonstrate A or B. D. A person may be guilty / innocent but the consequences rendered come down to what can be *proven*. This is a similar situation. The actual state of his facilities could still be that he is simply old, tired, but otherwise capable. E. People will twist this into a version that he is commenting on his own faculties, and use it to say, "See! He's not up to the job." F. IMO A&B is evidence that he is, in fact, still up for the job more than the guy on the other ticket.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Jul 3, 2024 18:24:10 GMT
When it comes to The NY Times anything they say about the president is suspect. Only considered suspect by liberals when they’re not kissing Biden and the democrats asses. Girl, your candidate can't put together a coherent and truthful sentence at any time of day. Take several seats. It's hilarious to me that you don't realize the leopards are going to eat your face, too, when they come to power. So blind.
|
|
|
Post by epeanymous on Jul 3, 2024 18:35:01 GMT
When it comes to The NY Times anything they say about the president is suspect. Only considered suspect by liberals when they’re not kissing Biden and the democrats asses. No one is kissing anyone’s ass out here. We’d vote for Biden; a manila folder; a can of Diet Dr. Pepper; a fictional Shona Rhimes character; three toddlers in a trenchcoat; a heavily inbred bassett hound; or an expired can of tuna fish if that is the alternative to the current Republican agenda. Happily. Without hesitation. Twice if it were legal. This is the grown-ups having a conversation about the deficits in our nominee’s profile. Something Republicans should be doing, times ten.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Jul 3, 2024 20:08:56 GMT
No one, and I mean no one, will be safe!
|
|