why are we having all these ppl from shithole countries

Gaslighting again, per your usual deflecting and MO here.

That's about the media, nothing about the peas in the article.

She can't think; she only knows what her conspiracy sites tell her.  I'm over it.  By all means, let's have some smart conservatives in here offering intelligent political debate.  This endless stupidity is crazy-making.

You think you’ve been any better? 🙄

Not parroting the group = derailing the thread. That's been pretty much the standard definition used to beat down anyone who messes up the endless loop of the group opinion. 

You come on here at every opportunity to insult us by calling us hypocrites, but you're wrong every time because you don't bother to question what you read.  You obviously see some misleading headline or outright lie on one of your favorite conspiracy sites, and then you think, "Oh, that's just like what they're complaining about over on the NSBR," and you rush back here to call us all hypocrites.  Without bothering to look into what your site said to see if it's true or, if it is, if the context makes it a valid comparison.

This complete lack of intellectual curiosity and critical thinking is Trump's hallmark.  He's made it OK for the American public to think, "Oh, that sounds good and validates my personal biases, so it must be true."

I read a tweet yesterday that claimed that David French from the National Review had written an article saying nuclear strikes weren't a big deal because they would mostly kill liberals in urban areas, and conservatives in rural areas/suburbs would be safe.  I had two choices: I could rush over here and post about what the nasty conservatives are up to, or I could investigate.  So I went to the NR site and looked up the article.  While it's a fairly misguided article, it didn't remotely say what was claimed in the tweet.  So I clicked away and went back to Twitter and unfollowed that person.  I'm not interested in hearing lies - not ones that validate my viewpoint or ones that don't.  You could have followed this same process with your assertion that Obama called Syria a shithole, but you didn't.   Why is that?

Spreading lies, whether to generate "discussion" or as potshots at people you don't like, doesn't serve our national discourse at all.  If I post something here that is verifiably false, you should call me out on it. Because I will call you out on your lies every time.

There is enormous difference (to thinking people) between "a shitshow IN Libya" (in reference to the war) and "a shithole" OF a country (in reference to the entirety of a country).  But, you know, not all people understand grammar and language.

If I've learned anything the past few days it's that, in general, it seems there are a lot of people ignorant of the US's (and Canada's) complicity in Haiti's shitholiness.

It's only crazy making if you can't ignore her. I wouldn’t be around anyone like her in real life so I surely won't interact with her on a message board. Of course I can totally ignore a ringing phone too. 

Normally I'm pretty good at ignoring them.  After two days in the house due to ice on the roads, I was getting a little stir crazy!

But yeah - the victim card has become super common here.  It's so tiresome.  Pointing out inaccuracies and lies is always seen as "silencing" the other side. 

Not from a conspiracy site. It was from the very Left leaning Atlantic. 

Yeah, I'm totally sure you dredged up that memory from an Atlantic article from two years ago, and your bringing it up has nothing to do with the false equivalencies on the subject made just last week on The Daily Caller and Breitbart.

Regardless, you're missing the point, which is that the two incidents (Trump's and Obama's) are not remotely equivalent.  The Atlantic reported what Obama said in context; the other sites I named pulled the Atlantic's words and drew a false equivalency, which you leapt over here to use as an insult. 

I made an observation on the outrage here about Obama calling Libya a shitshow. An observation doesn't need a source and neither does something that is common knowledge, as merge has shown. That was nothing more than a lame attempt at an unnecessary handslap. Your whole post was unnecessary.