PLurker
Prolific Pea
Posts: 9,840
Location: Behind the Cheddar Curtain
Jun 28, 2014 3:48:49 GMT
|
Post by PLurker on Jun 20, 2018 18:09:55 GMT
That's fair. We should acknowledge though, that the opposite has been demonstrated by some recently, in this very thread. Still, it was bitchy of me to say it in your thread simply to make a dig and I sincerely apologize. I was sarcastically venting my frustrations and this is not the place for that. apology accepted. The conservatives are frustrated also. It shouldn't take an "executive order" to get anything done. It should be up to our elected officials to take the lead.
as this was an administration policy why should everyone else have to correct when it took one elected official and his staff to enact it? asking sincerely.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 25, 2024 13:47:18 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2018 18:12:35 GMT
apology accepted. The conservatives are frustrated also. It shouldn't take an "executive order" to get anything done. It should be up to our elected officials to take the lead.
as this was an administration policy why should everyone else have to correct when it took one elected official and his staff to enact it? asking sincerely. I have no idea! They shouldn't have passed the law if they didn't want it enforced.
|
|
PLurker
Prolific Pea
Posts: 9,840
Location: Behind the Cheddar Curtain
Jun 28, 2014 3:48:49 GMT
|
Post by PLurker on Jun 20, 2018 18:16:10 GMT
as this was an administration policy why should everyone else have to correct when it took one elected official and his staff to enact it? asking sincerely. I have no idea! They shouldn't have passed the law if they didn't want it enforced. there was no law that demanded separation of families. first link I came to
|
|
|
Post by dewryce on Jun 20, 2018 18:46:15 GMT
That's fair. We should acknowledge though, that the opposite has been demonstrated by some recently, in this very thread. Still, it was bitchy of me to say it in your thread simply to make a dig and I sincerely apologize. I was sarcastically venting my frustrations and this is not the place for that. apology accepted. The conservatives are frustrated also. It shouldn't take an "executive order" to get anything done. It should be up to our elected officials to take the lead.
Thank you. The thing is, an executive order wasn't needed to change this. It was a recent policy decision by the current administration that started separating families in these circumstances, and a phone call could have stopped it. This was not a law. For a minute, I ask you to please look at this from a different point of view. This administration chose to separate children from their parents, in part as a deterrent for other people thinking about trying to enter illegally. Not all families that were separated did try to enter illegally, it happened to some of those seeking asylum through proper channels as well. The administration initially denied it was happening. Then they lied about why it was happening (blaming Democrats) and said that the Democrats weren't willing to fix it. All the while ignoring a bill that was put forth by the Democrats to stop it, and agreed by every last one of them. And ignoring the fact that they have the majority in the House and Senate as well as the Presidency. If it was a law they needed the cooperation of exactly zero Democrats to change it. Then the WH said they said they were not willing to entertain a plan to address the family separation issue alone, that the wall and dreamers had to be part of the plan. The children were being used a pawns. Then, after how many weeks of these families and children being put through this hell and blaming Democratic laws/policies for it, the President makes a big fuss about playing a hero and signing an executive order to stop the practice of family separation. When Trump's administration caused it and he had the power to stop it all along. This entire time children were suffering and no one in the party of power stopped it until it got this far, and then did so in a showboating manner to gain political points. And throughout people on this thread kept repeating incorrect information, even though links were provided with the correct information, and some even defended the vile practice. Can you see why Democrats would be frustrated too?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 25, 2024 13:47:18 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2018 19:00:03 GMT
apology accepted. The conservatives are frustrated also. It shouldn't take an "executive order" to get anything done. It should be up to our elected officials to take the lead.
Thank you.You are welcome!
|
|
lindas
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,306
Jun 26, 2014 5:46:37 GMT
|
Post by lindas on Jun 20, 2018 19:15:20 GMT
apology accepted. The conservatives are frustrated also. It shouldn't take an "executive order" to get anything done. It should be up to our elected officials to take the lead.
Thank you. The thing is, an executive order wasn't needed to change this. It was a recent policy decision by the current administration that started separating families in these circumstances, and a phone call could have stopped it. This was not a law. For a minute, I ask you to please look at this from a different point of view. This administration chose to separate children from their parents, in part as a deterrent for other people thinking about trying to enter illegally. Not all families that were separated did try to enter illegally, it happened to some of those seeking asylum through proper channels as well. The administration initially denied it was happening. Then they lied about why it was happening (blaming Democrats) and said that the Democrats weren't willing to fix it. All the while ignoring a bill that was put forth by the Democrats to stop it, and agreed by every last one of them. And ignoring the fact that they have the majority in the House and Senate as well as the Presidency. If it was a law they needed the cooperation of exactly zero Democrats to change it.Then the WH said they said they were not willing to entertain a plan to address the family separation issue alone, that the wall and dreamers had to be part of the plan. The children were being used a pawns. Then, after how many weeks of these families and children being put through this hell and blaming Democratic laws/policies for it, the President makes a big fuss about playing a hero and signing an executive order to stop the practice of family separation. When Trump's administration caused it and he had the power to stop it all along. This entire time children were suffering and no one in the party of power stopped it until it got this far, and then did so in a showboating manner to gain political points. And throughout people on this thread kept repeating incorrect information, even though links were provided with the correct information, and some even defended the vile practice. Can you see why Democrats would be frustrated too? Incorrect, you know very well that 60 votes are needed in the Senate to get anything passed and Schumer is never going to let that happen.
|
|
katybee
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,468
Jun 25, 2014 23:25:39 GMT
|
Post by katybee on Jun 20, 2018 19:24:32 GMT
Chances are not good. Just like some don't believe that some children have also been separated from their parents when following all rules while seeking asylum. Libarals aren't the only ones keeping track of the news. Thank you very much. Conservatives also cherish the "family unit" believe it or not. Conservatives aren't the uncaring and uninvolved people they are being made out to be. You mean that you’re making yourselves out to be. I’m sorry to be harsh. But if you in any way denied or defended this policy, I think you are uncaring. Period. We can have differences on immigration policy. But not on this. This has been unforgivable.
|
|
|
Post by dewryce on Jun 20, 2018 19:28:33 GMT
lindas I thought there was an option, I don't remember the name of it, where McConnel could make it so that a simple majority was needed. I could be wrong, will go see if I can find a reference. Eta: and I don't for a hot second believe that even if they didn't like the bill the Democrats would risk filibustering a bill that strictly dealt with family separation. Talk about bad optics, they'd be (rightly) skewered.
|
|
katybee
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,468
Jun 25, 2014 23:25:39 GMT
|
Post by katybee on Jun 20, 2018 19:32:19 GMT
lindas I thought there was an option, I don't remember the name of it, where McConnel could make it so that a simple majority was needed. I could be wrong, will go see if I can find a reference. Nuclear option.
|
|
|
Post by dewryce on Jun 20, 2018 19:36:24 GMT
lindas I thought there was an option, I don't remember the name of it, where McConnel could make it so that a simple majority was needed. I could be wrong, will go see if I can find a reference. Nuclear option. Yes, thank you! So is that not an option here? I'm willing to admit I may misunderstand when and how it can be used and if so am happy to amend my post. I just did some quick reading and don't see why it couldn't be used in this circumstance but hopefully someone with a better understanding can clarify.
|
|
|
Post by crimsoncat05 on Jun 20, 2018 19:38:56 GMT
<whispers> ...maybe because it wouldn't suit their purposes to do it that way??
or is that my cynicism showing again??
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Jun 20, 2018 19:40:11 GMT
How about if you read info that isn’t opinion and not so heavily biased? Are you saying that republicans don’t like the bill because it was a democrat who proposed it? That’s my takeaway from all of this.
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Jun 20, 2018 19:41:27 GMT
|
|
|
Post by dewryce on Jun 20, 2018 20:02:00 GMT
<whispers> ...maybe because it wouldn't suit their purposes to do it that way?? or is that my cynicism showing again?? LOL, right? But I can't figure out how it wouldn't suit their purpose to use it this time. They've already used it in the appointing of a SCJ so I know it's not that they object to using the option on principle. And to me, had there been a law in existence that caused the separation of families, especially a law passed by Democratics...using the nuclear option to fix this mess would have been an enormous political win and generated tons of goodwill for the Republican party. Including from me.
|
|
|
Post by leftturnonly on Jun 20, 2018 22:01:03 GMT
I just saw a clip of Chris Pratt's speech at the MTV awards. What a refreshing break from the new norm of politics at awards shows and politics being the focus of acceptance speeches!
I could have done without the "poop" part though, lol.
That was different from any other acceptance speech I've ever heard. Half of it was terrific. He's a walking poster for ADD!
|
|
|
Post by tara on Jun 20, 2018 22:04:42 GMT
Libarals aren't the only ones keeping track of the news. Thank you very much. Conservatives also cherish the "family unit" believe it or not. Conservatives aren't the uncaring and uninvolved people they are being made out to be. You mean that you’re making yourselves out to be. I’m sorry to be harsh. But if you in any way denied or defended this policy, I think you are uncaring. Period. We can have differences on immigration policy. But not on this. This has been unforgivable. Using children is the lowest of the low. When a black man gets shot by police, Ive seen people on this board say he shouldn’t have broken the law. I’ve seen people stick up for homophobia on this board. I’ve always chalked it up to these people are dumb assess, but when there are children being hurt and you say “oh well their parents shouldn’t have broken the law” that crap makes my blood run cold. Not caring about children is just pure evil. I can see now how nazi Germany happened. I will never look at these posters the same way again. Edit it to say I’m not a Democrat. I’m just a concerned American citizen who cares what we are becoming.
|
|
lindas
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,306
Jun 26, 2014 5:46:37 GMT
|
Post by lindas on Jun 20, 2018 22:20:19 GMT
Yes, thank you! So is that not an option here? I'm willing to admit I may misunderstand when and how it can be used and if so am happy to amend my post. I just did some quick reading and don't see why it couldn't be used in this circumstance but hopefully someone with a better understanding can clarify. It probably is an option but one I would hate to see them use. I would much rather see our representatives vote using common sense and not just along party lines all the time. McCain wasn't afraid to buck the party, I can't understand why the more moderate democrats are so afraid of Schumer and Pelosi. Wether or not they're up for reelection should should never come into play when passing laws for the entire country.
|
|
|
Post by katieanna on Jun 20, 2018 22:42:39 GMT
Children should NOT be pawns in the games of their caretakers. It is immoral and not the provenance of a civilized society. You're right...children should NOT be pawns in political machinations, nor should they be pawns in media propaganda. But from what I'm seeing this evening, the separation policy has been overturned...
|
|
|
Post by katieanna on Jun 20, 2018 23:04:48 GMT
Wow... your heart goes out to immigrant children, yet you have the audacity to call our children "little school shooter"? America HAS EVERY RIGHT to control its borders, but it seems to me that we're the only country that gets vilified for doing so. The illegal immigrants KNOW that they're NOT SUPPOSED to come here in the first place. They're putting their own children at risk of trafficking, the drug cartels, etc when attempting to cross the border. There's only so much we can do to protect them. If they don't like the way it's being handled, then don't come here. I'm sorry...but if this has been going on for as long as they're saying, then why all the fuss now? Liberal Propaganda Bullsh!t I don't even listen to it anymore. I think of the thousands of children in our own country who are homeless and starving. We have no business trying to care for others when we can't even take care of our own. Homeless Americans? First human trafficking and now let's help our own first. It's highly unlikely you'd support a policy to end any homegrown social justice issues so who the hell are we really trying to kid? Human trafficking??? Are you accusing me of human trafficking? The illegal immigrants coming across our borders need food, housing, and other necessities. Who do you think will be supplying those needs? It's the people in our nation who can least afford it. My concern is for the thousands of children and their families who are struggling every day in this country just to afford the necessities. If you can't understand the implications, then I don't know what else to tell you.
|
|
|
Post by tara on Jun 20, 2018 23:13:46 GMT
Homeless Americans? First human trafficking and now let's help our own first. It's highly unlikely you'd support a policy to end any homegrown social justice issues so who the hell are we really trying to kid? Human trafficking??? Are you accusing me of human trafficking? The illegal immigrants coming across our borders need food, housing, and other necessities. Who do you think will be supplying those needs? It's the people in our nation who can least afford it. My concern is for the thousands of children and their families who are struggling every day in this country just to afford the necessities. If you can't understand the implications, then I don't know what else to tell you. Like decent healthcare. (TIC)
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 25, 2024 13:47:18 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 20, 2018 23:19:39 GMT
Homeless Americans? First human trafficking and now let's help our own first. It's highly unlikely you'd support a policy to end any homegrown social justice issues so who the hell are we really trying to kid? Human trafficking??? Are you accusing me of human trafficking? The illegal immigrants coming across our borders need food, housing, and other necessities. Who do you think will be supplying those needs? It's the people in our nation who can least afford it. My concern is for the thousands of children and their families who are struggling every day in this country just to afford the necessities. If you can't understand the implications, then I don't know what else to tell you. . Then I take it you don’t support the Republican agenda of tax cuts , certainly not for the poor, and then cutting the federal programs that help these folks to pay for the tax cuts. Right? Because if you actually do have concerns for these folks struggling every day in this country just to afford the necessities you would know the Republican agenda doesn’t help them at all, in fact it makes their daily struggle harder.
|
|
|
Post by katieanna on Jun 20, 2018 23:25:37 GMT
Human trafficking??? Are you accusing me of human trafficking? The illegal immigrants coming across our borders need food, housing, and other necessities. Who do you think will be supplying those needs? It's the people in our nation who can least afford it. My concern is for the thousands of children and their families who are struggling every day in this country just to afford the necessities. If you can't understand the implications, then I don't know what else to tell you. . Then I take it you don’t support the Republican agenda of tax cuts , certainly not for the poor, and then cutting the federal programs that help these folks to pay for the tax cuts. Right? Because if you actually do have concerns for these folks struggling every day in this country just to afford the necessities you would know the Republican agenda doesn’t help them at all, in fact it makes their daily struggle harder. Most government policies do not help the poor who work and struggle every day to make a living...that includes both Republican and Democrat policies.
|
|
|
Post by katieanna on Jun 20, 2018 23:30:35 GMT
What a fucking disaster the whole southern border is and has been for a long time. There is plenty of blame to go around. Plenty and anyone trying to make it into a Dem vs Rep thing is being obtuse. We have kicked the can down the road for far too long. I don't know what the answer is, but what I do know is that each side of the aisle is pointing fingers and acting so holier than thou and we all know who is caught in the middle: the children. Children that have no idea what is happening nor any power to do anything about their circumstances. I am so pissed right now about the whole situation, I am sure that I am going to make zero sense in this post. These families coming across the border illegally aren't doing it wholly on their own. I believe that people are whispering in their ear to do it. "Go to the Land of Milk and Honey and the US will care for you and your children." These people know full well the what a disaster they are setting these immigrants up for. These families are pouring across the border for promises that no one can fulfill. The families, in their ignorance and naivety, trust whoever it is telling them these falsehoods. They are being used plain and simple. They are being used by the left to make the right appear heartless and cruel and they are being used by the right to force immigration reform and to make the left look like open border nutters. Shit needs to happen and maybe this absolute shit show on the border right now will force Left and Right to the table and get something worked out that we can all live with for the foreseeable future. I don't have much hope, though. Your post makes good sense...and I agree.
|
|
trollie
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,580
Jul 2, 2014 22:14:02 GMT
|
Post by trollie on Jun 20, 2018 23:34:58 GMT
Children should NOT be pawns in the games of their caretakers. It is immoral and not the provenance of a civilized society. You're right...children should NOT be pawns in political machinations, nor should they be pawns in media propaganda. But from what I'm seeing this evening, the separation policy has been overturned... What was the media propagating? The images you saw on TV came directly from the government. Media was not allowed to take pictures or even see where the babies and girls were being detained.
|
|
|
Post by leftturnonly on Jun 20, 2018 23:47:40 GMT
Conservatives who think its ok to have the children separated: I am genuinely curious about something, and I would like to understand how you balance your belief that children should be taken care of by the US Government but also hold on to the idea that the government should be limited. How do you manage both of those ideas? As it is right now, the US Government is being a babysitter (and definitely not a good babysitter, at that) for these children. If you believe big government is wrong, why is it ok for them to be the government babysitter? Would it not be better to allow those parents who are seeking asylum to parent their child than some random government worker? The reality is our government is going to lose some of these children and not be able to reunite them with their families. Which means that the children will become part of our system - needing Government insurance, services, food stamps, etc. Costing all of us resources. And before someone starts making claims I am a liberal trying to stir the pot, I am not. I *am* one of you, on most instances, and this is why I do want to understand. I am not going to call you names, make jokes at your expense, or any crap like that. I'm conservative. The rest of your question doesn't really apply to me, though, so all I can do is give you my limited perspective at this moment. In general, I see this specific new policy of separation as temporary and possibly even already addressed by actions taken by President Trump today and/or hopefully, future actions by the Congress. In general, not specifically what has been deemed news-worthy the past several days... Not all of those coming to our border's edge with children are actual families. Many of these children are not the child(ren) of those attempting to enter the country. It's a horrific situation that unfortunately is real. Mixed among those persons, whether they are in honest family units or alone and who are truly seeking a better life, are those who are some of the evilest, most corrupt on the planet. No horror is too great to inflict on someone else by them if there is money and power to be gained. I don't have a link for you, but I have heard a border agent speak about the number of children who are - in his words - simply dropped as soon as the person accompanying them gets what they can from having them along - which is easier entry into the country. And that's not even counting the number of children who are taken against their family's will and are brought in to the US as cheap free labor or worse, are sold into the illicit sex trade. Once here, too many of the children are lost track of and too many of the adults never show up for their hearings. We let them in and they simply disappear into the throng. We can not continue to turn blind eyes to the destructive nature of the evil that continues to come across our border hiding among the good people who need help. There are children at the border that need to be taken not from loving families but from those who prey on them. On top of that, the number seeking asylum has skyrocketed in recent years. The backlog is something like 600,000 people waiting to go through the system. The "cages" are the same as the "cages" around school playgrounds all across America, and children are/were there for a short time on a temporary basis. Most are reunited with their families in a matter of hours. Those who aren't reunited join other children, who either were abandoned soon after entering or who came into this country alone, in facilities/group homes where they are kept safe, clean, fed, and are taught English and a bit about America, and are given time to play. It's far from ideal, but they are treated far better than too many of our own children who are living in abject poverty, so it certainly could be far worse. Do I want families separated, with children "ripped from loving arms". No. I'm still haunted by this image of Elian Gonzales. Is that what we're dealing with here? Battle-ready soldiers are breaking into people's homes and taking these children at the point of an assault weapon? You know, like what really happened in WWII. This comparison to concentration camps being repeated everywhere is a true sin against the millions who suffered unspeakable hardships. The families that survive such terrible loss and the memory of those who did not survive all deserve better. When you equalize what's been happening this week, where children have been temporarily separated from whomever they were with when they reached our national border - and that person or person is often not even their family - with some of the most brutal treatment people have ever been subjected to, you lose my respect. Couple that with timing that I just can't accept as coincidental and the Democrat's demand that Trump "take his pen" and create an immediate change to how family separation will be handled at the border without baring any actual responsibility themselves, and you have a situation that I see as nothing more than preying even further on those who need our compassion and our help. Blame is not on one individual or one administration. It's not even on one country. This is a reality that is made very complicated by the duality of good people building a better future and bad people seeking to destroy that which is good all mixed together. It's time to make it easier for the good people and harder for the bad people for a change! Build the wall. Get through the asylum seeker backlog. Make illegal immigration a virtual non-issue. And keep this terrible situation from being possible in the future.
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on Jun 20, 2018 23:58:21 GMT
Homeless Americans? First human trafficking and now let's help our own first. It's highly unlikely you'd support a policy to end any homegrown social justice issues so who the hell are we really trying to kid? Human trafficking??? Are you accusing me of human trafficking?The illegal immigrants coming across our borders need food, housing, and other necessities. Who do you think will be supplying those needs? It's the people in our nation who can least afford it. My concern is for the thousands of children and their families who are struggling every day in this country just to afford the necessities. If you can't understand the implications, then I don't know what else to tell you. Don't. You don't have to tell me anything else. You aren't very smart, likely one of those Americans whose family has remained working class for generations despite educational opportunities and privilege. You can never get ahead and blame everyone except yourself. You think this administration will somehow change your lot in life and that diminished level of intelligence won't allow you to see whats really going on. "These why-did-people-vote-for-Trump studies are clarifying, but also a little bit unsatisfying, from the point of view of a politician. They dispel the fiction—to use another 2016 meme—that the majority of Trump supporters are disenfranchised victims of capitalism’s cruelties. At the same time, deep-seated psychological resentment is harder for policy makers to address than an overly meager disability check. You can teach out-of-work coal miners to code, but you may not be able to convince them to embrace changing racial and gender norms. You can offer universal basic incomes, but that won’t ameliorate resentment of demographic changes. In other words, it’s now pretty clear that many Trump supporters feel threatened, frustrated, and marginalized—not on an economic, but on an existential level. Now what?" www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/04/existential-anxiety-not-poverty-motivates-trump-support/558674/
|
|
|
Post by crimsoncat05 on Jun 20, 2018 23:59:19 GMT
Wether or not they're up for reelection should should never come into play when passing laws for the entire country. I agree- but honestly, I think MOST of what EVERY politician does nowadays is MAINLY for how it looks to the voters, or whether it's paying back any lobbyists or big donors (either past or future). The whole 'lame duck' session idea, and the idea of 'we can't pass THAT bill because it's only 6 months till the election and I don't want to look bad to my constituents or donors' is getting really old. Not that they'd ever do it, but I wish they'd pass some sort of law that says election 'season' can only be 6 weeks long or less, like in some other countries. And that outside of that period of time, they'd actually have to do their JOB- which is to discuss and vote on legislation, not just 'kick the can down the road' with every issue. (I HATE that phrase with the fire of a thousand suns... I don't know why it bothers me so much, but it does.)
|
|
|
Post by katieanna on Jun 21, 2018 0:07:31 GMT
Conservatives who think its ok to have the children separated: I am genuinely curious about something, and I would like to understand how you balance your belief that children should be taken care of by the US Government but also hold on to the idea that the government should be limited. How do you manage both of those ideas? As it is right now, the US Government is being a babysitter (and definitely not a good babysitter, at that) for these children. If you believe big government is wrong, why is it ok for them to be the government babysitter? Would it not be better to allow those parents who are seeking asylum to parent their child than some random government worker? The reality is our government is going to lose some of these children and not be able to reunite them with their families. Which means that the children will become part of our system - needing Government insurance, services, food stamps, etc. Costing all of us resources. And before someone starts making claims I am a liberal trying to stir the pot, I am not. I *am* one of you, on most instances, and this is why I do want to understand. I am not going to call you names, make jokes at your expense, or any crap like that. I'm conservative. The rest of your question doesn't really apply to me, though, so all I can do is give you my limited perspective at this moment. In general, I see this specific new policy of separation as temporary and possibly even already addressed by actions taken by President Trump today and/or hopefully, future actions by the Congress. In general, not specifically what has been deemed news-worthy the past several days... Not all of those coming to our border's edge with children are actual families. Many of these children are not the child(ren) of those attempting to enter the country. It's a horrific situation that unfortunately is real. Mixed among those persons, whether they are in honest family units or alone and who are truly seeking a better life, are those who are some of the evilest, most corrupt on the planet. No horror is too great to inflict on someone else by them if there is money and power to be gained. I don't have a link for you, but I have heard a border agent speak about the number of children who are - in his words - simply dropped as soon as the person accompanying them gets what they can from having them along - which is easier entry into the country. And that's not even counting the number of children who are taken against their family's will and are brought in to the US as cheap free labor or worse, are sold into the illicit sex trade. Once here, too many of the children are lost track of and too many of the adults never show up for their hearings. We let them in and they simply disappear into the throng. We can not continue to turn blind eyes to the destructive nature of the evil that continues to come across our border hiding among the good people who need help. There are children at the border that need to be taken not from loving families but from those who prey on them. On top of that, the number seeking asylum has skyrocketed in recent years. The backlog is something like 600,000 people waiting to go through the system. The "cages" are the same as the "cages" around school playgrounds all across America, and children are/were there for a short time on a temporary basis. Most are reunited with their families in a matter of hours. Those who aren't reunited join other children, who either were abandoned soon after entering or who came into this country alone, in facilities/group homes where they are kept safe, clean, fed, and are taught English and a bit about America, and are given time to play. It's far from ideal, but they are treated far better than too many of our own children who are living in abject poverty, so it certainly could be far worse. Do I want families separated, with children "ripped from loving arms". No. I'm still haunted by this image of Elian Gonzales. Is that what we're dealing with here? Battle-ready soldiers are breaking into people's homes and taking these children at the point of an assault weapon? You know, like what really happened in WWII. This comparison to concentration camps being repeated everywhere is a true sin against the millions who suffered unspeakable hardships. The families that survive such terrible loss and the memory of those who did not survive all deserve better. When you equalize what's been happening this week, where children have been temporarily separated from whomever they were with when they reached our national border - and that person or person is often not even their family - with some of the most brutal treatment people have ever been subjected to, you lose my respect. Couple that with timing that I just can't accept as coincidental and the Democrat's demand that Trump "take his pen" and create an immediate change to how family separation will be handled at the border without baring any actual responsibility themselves, and you have a situation that I see as nothing more than preying even further on those who need our compassion and our help. Blame is not on one individual or one administration. It's not even on one country. This is a reality that is made very complicated by the duality of good people building a better future and bad people seeking to destroy that which is good all mixed together. It's time to make it easier for the good people and harder for the bad people for a change! Build the wall. Get through the asylum seeker backlog. Make illegal immigration a virtual non-issue. And keep this terrible situation from being possible in the future. You said what I was thinking but what I found difficult to put into words and type out on my phone. :thumbsup:
|
|
|
Post by katieanna on Jun 21, 2018 0:11:36 GMT
Human trafficking??? Are you accusing me of human trafficking?The illegal immigrants coming across our borders need food, housing, and other necessities. Who do you think will be supplying those needs? It's the people in our nation who can least afford it. My concern is for the thousands of children and their families who are struggling every day in this country just to afford the necessities. If you can't understand the implications, then I don't know what else to tell you. Don't. You don't have to tell me anything else. You aren't very smart, likely one of those Americans whose family has remained working class for generations despite educational opportunities and privilege. You can never get ahead and blame everyone except yourself. You think this administration will somehow change your lot in life and that diminished level of intelligence won't allow you to see whats really going on. "These why-did-people-vote-for-Trump studies are clarifying, but also a little bit unsatisfying, from the point of view of a politician. They dispel the fiction—to use another 2016 meme—that the majority of Trump supporters are disenfranchised victims of capitalism’s cruelties. At the same time, deep-seated psychological resentment is harder for policy makers to address than an overly meager disability check. You can teach out-of-work coal miners to code, but you may not be able to convince them to embrace changing racial and gender norms. You can offer universal basic incomes, but that won’t ameliorate resentment of demographic changes. In other words, it’s now pretty clear that many Trump supporters feel threatened, frustrated, and marginalized—not on an economic, but on an existential level. Now what?" www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/04/existential-anxiety-not-poverty-motivates-trump-support/558674/What a bunch of absolute baloney! Your post says a lot more about you than it does me.
|
|
|
Post by #notLauren on Jun 21, 2018 0:24:19 GMT
So, I've searched here and what a surprise; not a word from our liberal peas about Peter Fonda tweeting about kidnapping and torturing Baron Trump.
|
|