|
Post by dewryce on Jun 23, 2018 23:47:06 GMT
You do realize that illegal immigration is a misdeamenor. And that appearing at the border asking for asylum is allowed. In contrast, using the office of Potus for personal gain, insider trading (Wilber Ross), misappropriation of governments funds (Munuchin, Pruitt), lying under oath (Sessions), lying on security clearance forms 3 times (Kushner), working with foreign agents (the whole damn clan) are all Felonies. But I understand, IOKIYRR. Nope, there are a LOT of illegal immigrants that sneak into our country over the border. They ARE illegal immigrants. I think you misunderstand what she is saying. She did not claim that illegal immigrants didn't exist, she said that the offense was a misdemeanor. Perhaps you thought she said misnomer? I did my first read through and was also confused.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 9:58:33 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2018 23:50:56 GMT
Nope, there are a LOT of illegal immigrants that sneak into our country over the border. They ARE illegal immigrants. I think you misunderstand what she is saying. She did not claim that illegal immigrants didn't exist, she said that the offense was a misdemeanor. Perhaps you thought she said misnomer? I did my first read through and was also confused. You are probably right--I have dyslexia. That adds and subtracts letters, and mixes them up sometimes.
|
|
|
Post by pierkiss on Jun 23, 2018 23:52:36 GMT
I remember the good old days when being conservative wasn't based upon hatred of liberals. It was actually a political ideology. I can't remember a time when being liberal wasn't based on hating conservatives. Uh, I can.
|
|
|
Post by dewryce on Jun 23, 2018 23:57:49 GMT
I can't remember a time when being liberal wasn't based on hating conservatives. Uh, I can. Yeah, I married one, and it has never been an issue until this administration. Fortunately for me, he is now what we call a recovering republican (RR), or a democrat in denial (DiD).
|
|
|
Post by elaine on Jun 24, 2018 0:01:22 GMT
Yeah, I married one, and it has never been an issue until this administration. Fortunately for me, he is now what we call a recovering republican (RR), or a democrat in denial (DiD). I married one too. GWB turned him to the liberal side. And he voted for GWB the first time - in fact, every election before W’s second one my dh had voted Republican.
|
|
|
Post by dewryce on Jun 24, 2018 0:10:54 GMT
Yeah, I married one, and it has never been an issue until this administration. Fortunately for me, he is now what we call a recovering republican (RR), or a democrat in denial (DiD). I married one too. GWB turned him to the liberal side. And he voted for GWB the first time - in fact, every election before W’s second one my dh had voted Republican. It's taken my DH a bit longer to come around. The one good thing to come out of this election But seriously, it has opened his eyes to quite a bit and it has been very difficult for him, as I imagine it is for a lot of people. He is prolife so that makes it especially hard for him. As other Republicans have expressed on this board, he's looking around and not recognizing the party he once identified with. I know how upset I am when my party does something to disappoint me, because it certainly happens on both sides, I can't imagine dealing with it on this level.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Jun 24, 2018 0:14:53 GMT
Also married to a conservative here. He hasn’t come around yet, but at least he isn’t a fan of Trump.
|
|
|
Post by artgirl1 on Jun 24, 2018 0:48:33 GMT
Nope, there are a LOT of illegal immigrants that sneak into our country over the border. They ARE illegal immigrants. But not all immigrants are illegal. Those detained at the border under the current policy are requesting asylum. They have not been declared illegal immigrants.
|
|
|
Post by katieanna on Jun 24, 2018 0:53:05 GMT
That's called liberal bias and hypocrisy. I know the concept of immutable characteristics and protected classes has been explained to you already, so I’m not sure why this is all so difficult for you to comprehend. C'mon, Merge, that is just an excuse and you know it. It all depends upon who is involved and which way they lean. Given a similar situation with the characters reversed, the left wouldn't be near as vocal. I've seen that here over and over again.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 9:58:33 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2018 0:53:54 GMT
Nope, there are a LOT of illegal immigrants that sneak into our country over the border. They ARE illegal immigrants. But not all immigrants are illegal. Those detained at the border under the current policy are requesting asylum. They have not been declared illegal immigrants. I really don't remember saying that all immigrants are illegal. I said we have a LOT of illegal immigrants that sneak into our country over the border.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Jun 24, 2018 1:08:09 GMT
I know the concept of immutable characteristics and protected classes has been explained to you already, so I’m not sure why this is all so difficult for you to comprehend. C'mon, Merge, that is just an excuse and you know it. It all depends upon who is involved and which way they lean. Given a similar situation with the characters reversed, the left wouldn't be near as vocal. I've seen that here over and over again. No, I don't know that. I know that protections for certain things are enshrined in law, and there's a reason why they are. It's not an excuse at all. This isn't about the left being vocal or not vocal. What the left thinks has nothing to do with it. Immutable characteristics are protected by law. Political and career choices are not.
|
|
|
Post by 50offscrapper on Jun 24, 2018 6:36:25 GMT
I'm studying various aspects of the Civil War - i.e., the Civil War from the perspective of many diverse individuals and their families. I'm trying to find out about a near ancestor of mine. It's important to me to find out about my father's grandmother for personal reasons. Because there are wickedly long generations on that side, she lived and died before there was much paperwork and virtually none has been found on her. So, I took a DNA test, and had my mother tested as well to be able to rule out matches. I'm looking for any commonalities between matches that must go back to the early 1800's, late 1700's so that means mapping out a lot of other people's trees. Even though I grew up in the north, I have groups of matches that were all in the south and everything about their lives differs from my immediate family drastically. It's a struggle for me every time I see that CSA (Confederate States of America - the rebels of the Civil War) pop up. I've studied quite a number of southern families. I finally found some empathy for anyone who fought for the Confederacy when I studied several families from Texas before, during and after the Civil War. When I got to the Civil War in Missouri, my perspective changed yet again. Living there at that time must have been brutal. Since Missouri was both a slave state and still part of the Union, the state was terribly divided. It was a very dangerous time and place to live no matter what you believed in. I've learned that it's really, really, really easy to categorize people and assume you understand their beliefs, their way of life even, without ever taking the trouble to actually learn about them. But when you do learn about them, as individuals, you may confirm what you always thought, and/or you may learn things that touch your heart and change everything you always thought you knew about people on a personal level. This hysteria from the left - and yes, I do mean hysteria with all the emotional drama that entails - is so damaging. This banner of moral superiority that they hold forth as they go headlong into battle hasn't been properly earned. They are not morally superior. They were not innocent during our last presidential election. The motives to take down our current president are not as pure as the rhetoric implores us to believe. This is the same party that put economic prosperity based on the enslavement of an entire race above the dignity of the human soul. This is the same party that created the Ku Klux Klan in order to keep down those people of color who were freed by emancipation. This is the same party who in this last presidential election hung their hopes and dreams on a woman who had more properly earned the right to a trial by her peers in a felony court than a national election for president. This is the same party ripping babies out of their mother's wombs while they gnash their teeth over children being temporarily separated from their mothers, coyotes, and other odious persons at our border.Donald Trump is not a gentleman. He is crude and he is obnoxious. Those who hate him are not gentle. They too are crude and obnoxious. And when they rally beneath the banner of moral superiority to try to oust the duly elected and seated President of the United States of America when they are in fact, not morally superior, they are creating a very deep divide amongst us. The 4 bloody years of the American Civil War were set off by the firing on US troops at Fort Sumter in South Carolina's Charleston Bay by the Confederates who were resisting compliance with the rule of the United States. Not so different now. We have federal laws that define how we regulate our borders. They create sanctuary cities and march for no borders. We have federal laws intended to create a safe and regulated method for immigrants to enter our country as well as a pathway to becoming legal citizens of the United States. They want people who sneak into the country for whatever reason to be given all the rights and privileges of those who earned those rights through our legal methods. To emphasize this, a concerted effort is made to never distinguish between legal and illegal immigration. They are proudly resisting. Again. Yes, there is great civil unrest throughout this country. Once again, it is based on a claim to moral superiority. And once again, the truth is anything but. Every.single.thing. Thank you. Exactly how I feel also. The bolded part especially. Liberals are ripping babies out of women’s wombs? Where is this happening? The government is doing this? Yeah,no. Liberals believe in the right to chose not necessarily in abortion. Big difference. Nobody is forcing anyone to have an abortion. Maybe if birth control was taught we would have less unwanted pregnancies.
|
|
|
Post by 50offscrapper on Jun 24, 2018 6:53:57 GMT
Some people ignore racism when it is obvious. Just saying. Some people (illegal immigrants) ignore our laws. Just saying. And some Presidents and their administration ignore laws. Emoluments clauses? Lying to Congress? Violating FARA? Lying on a security questionnaires. Tit for tat horse trading with China. Obtaining tIvanka Trump trademarks for promises of allowing ZTE access to US components.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 9:58:33 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2018 7:24:16 GMT
Yes, I do think your willfully ignorant of you ignore the history of civil unrest and just plain bad behavior toward various administrations to declare that Trump’s administration has been treated so much worse than any previous administration. Reagan and Jim Brady were shot. Bush had people protesting outside his Texas ranch for his decision regarding Iraq. Scooter Libby outed a CIA agent because she didn’t agree with his policies. O’bama was regularly hung in effigy and he and his family were regularly compared to apes. The civil rights era as a whole. The assasination of JFK and Robert Kennedy. This administration hasn’t been treated any worse than administrations before them. Those events with other presidents were done by fringe lunatics and nobody cheered it, condoned it or made excuses for it. Everyone condemned it all. Trump has been the target of supposedly normal people, celebrities, college professors, high school teachers, politicians, Hollywood, now restaurant owners, and people expect it, condone it, and justify it all. So, I respectfully disagree that it hasn't been worse in this administration.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 9:58:33 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2018 7:36:21 GMT
Elaine, I will have to disagree with you. I’m not going to argue your point because I think we are so far off on our opinions that it would not do either of us any good and we would probably just go around in circles. There have been some recent reporting regarding what happened to some of the unaccompanied children that came over in 2014 so for these kids, the policy of the previous administration failed. I do agree that the Charlottesville white supremists are reprehensible and disgusting but there were some pretty ugly marches and things going on before Trump became president so I don’t think one lead to the other. Again, I know we will disagree about that so I’m just giving my two cents for what it’s worth. Yes, Tom Arnold is a kook but he has a presence on social media whereas this jackass from the DMV doesn’t. He has name recognition so whatever he says is going to get some attention. The other nutter just isnt going to get the same eyes on his social media pages as Tom Arnold so that is the difference to me. We will agree to disagree on this. That I have to live in a country under a President who supports neo-Nazis definitely reflects an unprecedented level of evil and immorality in our government. No other President in our lifetime has supported Neo-Nazis and White Supremacists. Trump is one-of-a-kind. Anyone who supports Trump after his “some good people” comment is no friend of anyone of color, any Jew, or LGBT person. It is all overblown hysteria until they start carrying torches chanting “XYZ will not replace us” and XYZ is the group YOU (generic you) belong to. Mixed in among the disgusting white supremacists and Antifa lunatics, were normal, respctable people that weren't any of those things and were only there to protest the removal of statues. Nothing more. THAT is who Trump is referring to as good people. And to ignore that indisputable FACT and continue to say that Trump was calling disgusting white supremacists and Antifa lunatics "good people" is perpetuating a lie. I know that elaine has me on ignore, so if anybody cares that she gets that info so she can stop repeating incorrect info, could you please quote me on it?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 9:58:33 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2018 7:46:32 GMT
Mike Huckabee's tweet: Bigotry. On the menu at Red Hen Restaurant in Lexington VA. Or you can ask for the “Hate Plate”. And appetizers are “small plates for small minds” What do you see as racist here? Try this one
That isn't about their race, it's about their gang membership. She defended the horrific, inhumane gang MS-13. The gang that rapes and attacks another human with a nail studded baseball bat with such viciousness that parts of her body were caved in, rips out another human's heart while they're still alive, decapitates another human, hacks another human to bits with a machete, etc. Nancy Pelosi defended those ANIMALS. So, it wasn't a racist tweet.
|
|
|
Post by lauradrumm on Jun 24, 2018 7:49:13 GMT
In my early days, I was a liberal democrat...because at the time, I didn't know any better. But even then, I knew abortion was morally and ethically wrong. In your opinion! Leave my body alone! It’s my soul so you have no business worrying about it or telling me what to do! The GOVERNMENT has even LESS! You’re basing your entire political choices on something the government has no right to be involved in!
|
|
|
Post by lauradrumm on Jun 24, 2018 7:51:04 GMT
Yeah, I married one, and it has never been an issue until this administration. Fortunately for me, he is now what we call a recovering republican (RR), or a democrat in denial (DiD). Mine too!!!!
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 9:58:33 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2018 8:18:18 GMT
You're right, it IS ridiculous that you FELT you had to "tap that out", since no one is debating that. " If the very existence of this thread disturbs you, it’s probably best not to contribute.
If you believe that not opposing the president or this administration at every turn equates to being cool with racism, sexism, homophobia, xenophobia, etc., it’s probably best not to contribute.
Anyone can post here, obviously, but this is not the place for those with opposing views to grill conservatives and demand that they defend every word of every post ad naseum. If you see that as us not wanting to be challenged on our views, it’s probably best not to contribute, and you can complain about that in every other thread you like." Given the above request for this thread, social graces should tell you that you aren't suited for this thread and when they don't, and you persist in blaming everything on conservatives, insulting them, refusing to listen to thoughtful, civil posts, and despite being asked the above, you're trolling. 1. The subject of the treatment of these people have disturbed me. I was just disturbed that it didn’t disturbed you. 2. Being here 48 hours isn’t invading your thread and asking questions is not attacking. Then you get mad at people when you throw out something so out there and then you get more mad when people don’t don’t buy it. 3. We dont expect you to denounce trump at every turn but when your president acts like a dictator more than any other president in history, you might be concerned. If you’re not then I guess there is nothing else to say. We are lost as humans and you’re right. I’m not suited for this thread. And that’s a good thing. 1. I never said it didn't disturb me, in fact I mentioned how disturbing it was at some point in this thread. So your excuse about being disturbed that I wasn't disturbed is invalid. 2. Pointing fingers, blaming it all on conservatives for Trumps failings AND Obama's, demanding we answer and see it your way, calling us terrible Christians, etc. most certainly are personal attacks. And that has been made clear here from the very first post on this thread, that it isn't welcome here. 3. Yes, we ARE expected to denounce Trump at every turn. Yes, we are. I personally was told to give the answer that was in agreement with everyone else and not to HAVE a stray thought on the subject. You (general) also have a hard time accepting that not everyone sees what you claim to be dictatorship, racist, terrifying, etc. (and not always Trump related) And they're not wrong, misguided, blind or stupid in their understanding. You hear something reported with extreme bias, read something, think something, accept it as fact and demand everyone think the same thing and Just. Can. Not. Fathom. that not everyone fell victim to the spin you gave it. And again, that's not just Trump related stuff. I've pointed out many instances. Even on this thread. Again, general you.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 9:58:33 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2018 8:25:53 GMT
As a purely theoretical discussion, why are people not ok with Sarah not being served at the Red Hen but applauding the Supreme Court ruling on the baker refusing to bake a cake for a gay couple. Conversely, why are people upset about a baker denying a gay couple service but not upset about a restaurant denying Sarah service. Cognitive dissonance at it’s finest. Pick a principle and stick with it. I do think there is a difference in denying service to an individual vs denying service to a class of people when you are a place of public accommodation. That said, I don’t support denying service in either case. I don't believe there's any difference in denying service because you disagree with their politics vs. denying service because you disagree with them getting married.
|
|
inkedup
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,837
Jun 26, 2014 5:00:26 GMT
|
Post by inkedup on Jun 24, 2018 8:30:37 GMT
I do think there is a difference in denying service to an individual vs denying service to a class of people when you are a place of public accommodation. That said, I don’t support denying service in either case. I don't believe there's any difference in denying service because you disagree with their politics vs. denying service because you disagree with them getting married. The difference in less than 10 words: Sexual orientation is not a choice; political affiliation is. Oh, and also? Since the letter of the law is so important to you as evidenced by your 96,532 posts on the immigrant issue, gay people are a legally protected class.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 9:58:33 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2018 8:35:08 GMT
Good points. I think that's where we're headed again. You? I'm studying various aspects of the Civil War - i.e., the Civil War from the perspective of many diverse individuals and their families. I'm trying to find out about a near ancestor of mine. It's important to me to find out about my father's grandmother for personal reasons. Because there are wickedly long generations on that side, she lived and died before there was much paperwork and virtually none has been found on her. So, I took a DNA test, and had my mother tested as well to be able to rule out matches. I'm looking for any commonalities between matches that must go back to the early 1800's, late 1700's so that means mapping out a lot of other people's trees. Even though I grew up in the north, I have groups of matches that were all in the south and everything about their lives differs from my immediate family drastically. It's a struggle for me every time I see that CSA (Confederate States of America - the rebels of the Civil War) pop up. I've studied quite a number of southern families. I finally found some empathy for anyone who fought for the Confederacy when I studied several families from Texas before, during and after the Civil War. When I got to the Civil War in Missouri, my perspective changed yet again. Living there at that time must have been brutal. Since Missouri was both a slave state and still part of the Union, the state was terribly divided. It was a very dangerous time and place to live no matter what you believed in. I've learned that it's really, really, really easy to categorize people and assume you understand their beliefs, their way of life even, without ever taking the trouble to actually learn about them. But when you do learn about them, as individuals, you may confirm what you always thought, and/or you may learn things that touch your heart and change everything you always thought you knew about people on a personal level. This hysteria from the left - and yes, I do mean hysteria with all the emotional drama that entails - is so damaging. This banner of moral superiority that they hold forth as they go headlong into battle hasn't been properly earned. They are not morally superior. They were not innocent during our last presidential election. The motives to take down our current president are not as pure as the rhetoric implores us to believe. This is the same party that put economic prosperity based on the enslavement of an entire race above the dignity of the human soul. This is the same party that created the Ku Klux Klan in order to keep down those people of color who were freed by emancipation. This is the same party who in this last presidential election hung their hopes and dreams on a woman who had more properly earned the right to a trial by her peers in a felony court than a national election for president. This is the same party ripping babies out of their mother's wombs while they gnash their teeth over children being temporarily separated from their mothers, coyotes, and other odious persons at our border. Donald Trump is not a gentleman. He is crude and he is obnoxious. Those who hate him are not gentle. They too are crude and obnoxious. And when they rally beneath the banner of moral superiority to try to oust the duly elected and seated President of the United States of America when they are in fact, not morally superior, they are creating a very deep divide amongst us. The 4 bloody years of the American Civil War were set off by the firing on US troops at Fort Sumter in South Carolina's Charleston Bay by the Confederates who were resisting compliance with the rule of the United States. Not so different now. We have federal laws that define how we regulate our borders. They create sanctuary cities and march for no borders. We have federal laws intended to create a safe and regulated method for immigrants to enter our country as well as a pathway to becoming legal citizens of the United States. They want people who sneak into the country for whatever reason to be given all the rights and privileges of those who earned those rights through our legal methods. To emphasize this, a concerted effort is made to never distinguish between legal and illegal immigration. They are proudly resisting. Again. Yes, there is great civil unrest throughout this country. Once again, it is based on a claim to moral superiority. And once again, the truth is anything but. Great insight and amazingly well put! I always enjoy reading what you have to say.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 9:58:33 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2018 8:44:10 GMT
I don't believe there's any difference in denying service because you disagree with their politics vs. denying service because you disagree with them getting married. The difference in less than 10 words: Sexual orientation is not a choice; political affiliation is. Oh, and also? Since the letter of the law is so important to you as evidenced by your 96,532 posts on the immigrant issue, gay people are a legally protected class. Not sure why it matters if it's a choice or not a choice that makes it okay or not okay to deny service based on those issues. People's politics and beliefs aren't changed like a shirt. And you need a government to tell you who to be tolerant of? If they don't make it the law then you don't have to be tolerant of differences?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 9:58:33 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2018 8:58:23 GMT
When one party rallies behind a guy who lies as easily as he breathes, who regularly cheats on each wife he’s had, who mocks disabled people, who enacts policies that tear children away from their families, who discounts the service of former POWs and gold star families and who uses the language of genocide (vermin, infesting, breeding) to refer to immigrants... I’m going to claim moral superiority. Frankly, it’s not a very high bar in this case. I can’t really think of very many people I’ve known in my life who wouldn’t be morally superior to a standard this low. When one party rallies behind a woman who lies as easily as she breathes, who in one breath decimates her husband's sexual assault victims and in another says all victims should be believed, who brags about making enemies of half the country she's asking to lead, who says all the things about illegal immigrants and building walls that Trump was a racist, xenophobe for saying, who disparages half the country, who lied to gold star families and when they called her on it she called them all liars, who can't, won't or doesn't understand how to deal with classified documents properly or safely and puts national security at risk, believes the laws and rules don't apply to her, has her husband go bribe the attorney general with the promise of a job in the middle of an investigation... those people hold absolutely NO moral high ground.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 9:58:33 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2018 9:06:33 GMT
You know that if it would have been, the Liberal press would have been all over it. I remember the good old days when being conservative wasn't based upon hatred of liberals. It was actually a political ideology. I remember the good old days when being liberal wasn't based on a demand for conformity and group think and they actually believed in diversity of thought along with diversity of people.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 9:58:33 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2018 9:18:46 GMT
Enjoying the discussion here. So far no name calling. I like that. I love hearing things that make me think. I often see both sides to an issue and argue both sides in my head to clarify my thinking. Sometimes there are no easy answers and I get overwhemed by the complexity because to fix one thing you end up breaking another. That said, I believe in the power of one person making a difference. What can we do to bridge the gap between the right and left and how do we encourage polite discourse? Could the power of the peas create solutions to problems? Could we lay aside our preconceived concepts and create real solutions. I for one believe we can if we try. I think the largest problem is how far away from fiscal issues politics has become. It is quite hard for people to compromise on moral/social issues people see as right or wrong. And saying liberals are hysterical is name calling. If you're "terrified" (actually stated) because Trump spoke about national day of patriotism, the same as every other president (including Obama) since Eisenhower, if you've created a fantasy that Melania is being beaten by Trump and in hiding because she's actually off recovering from surgery, if you claim Trump is Hitler and needs to be taken out in a body bag, and you claim Trump is Hitler because the kids crossing the border are being housed in cages and his policies are separating families as a deterrent, but Obama putting kids in cages and having policies that separate families as a deterrent is NOT Hitler, then yes, you're being hysterical. And if you're being hysterical, it's not name calling to state that you're being hysterical.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 9:58:33 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2018 9:51:46 GMT
Thoughts on whether Sanders committed an ethics violation? Although there is evidence of potential violations of ethics, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 9:58:33 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2018 9:58:58 GMT
I remember the good old days when being a conservative wasn't looked on as being a vial person. Those days are apparently gone. Talk about hate??? I think you need to look a little further before you spue that sentence around. It would be pretty silly for me to hate conservatives and consider them all vile, since I lean that way on several issues. I have not once condemned all conservatives or called them vile. But I'm beyond sick and tired of blanket labels about libtards and liberal tears. I live in a very conservative area, and have been shut down multiple times as a non-christian baby killer for not voting for Trump from people I used to go to church with. I've been told that immigrants - especially Muslims - are here to kill us all and take over our country. I've been told that we need to get rid of all that welfare for those welfare queens (whatever that means) even though I know many of my conservative neighbors receive government assistance of various sorts for their families. Even on this very thread, presumably for conservatives only, there is at least one person who thinks that black people get a free pass. I get that bad behavior exists on both sides of the aisle. But don't play the victim here. You have attacked "liberals" in multiple ways, especially over the last couple of days, and accused them of bad behavior. You want better behavior from those hysterical liberals? Model it. You may not have, but dozens of others have. No one has said that here. Not one single person has condemned anyone here for NOT voting for Trump. Can't say the same for voting for Trump. Too may people confuse objecting to personal attacks and defending yourself against them as attacking them.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 9:58:33 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2018 10:23:12 GMT
I reached my limit and can't view the article. Would someone be able to give a very brief summary, or is it something that I really need to whole thing? Stephanie Wilkinson was at home Friday evening — nearly 200 miles from the White House — when the choice presented itself.
Her phone rang about 8 p.m. It was the chef at the Red Hen, the tiny farm-to-table restaurant that she co-owned just off Main Street in Lexington, Va.
Sarah Huckabee Sanders had just walked in and sat down, the chef informed her.
“He said the staff is a little concerned. What should we do?” Wilkinson told The Washington Post. “I said I’d be down to see if it’s true.”
It seemed unlikely to her that President Trump’s press secretary should be dining at a 26-seat restaurant in rural Virginia. But then, it was unlikely that her entire staff would have misidentified Sanders, who had arrived last to a table of eight booked under her husband’s name.
As she made the short drive to the Red Hen, Wilkinson knew only this:
She knew Lexington, population 7,000, had voted overwhelmingly against Trump in a county that voted overwhelmingly for him. She knew the community was deeply divided over such issues as Confederate flags. She knew, she said, that her restaurant and its half-dozen servers and cooks had managed to stay in business for 10 years by keeping politics off the menu.
And she knew — she believed — that Sarah Huckabee Sanders worked in the service of an “inhumane and unethical” administration. That she publicly defended the president’s cruelest policies, and that that could not stand.
“I’m not a huge fan of confrontation,” Wilkinson said. “I have a business, and I want the business to thrive. This feels like the moment in our democracy when people have to make uncomfortable actions and decisions to uphold their morals.”
When she walked into the restaurant, Wilkinson saw that there had been no mistake. The Red Hen is no bigger than some apartments, and the group table was impossible to miss: Sanders in a black dress, her husband, three or four men and women of roughly similar ages, and an older couple.
“They had cheese boards in front of them,” Wilkinson said. Like any other family. The kitchen was already preparing the party’s main course. Wilkinson interrupted to huddle with her workers.
Several Red Hen employees were gay, she said. They knew Sanders had defended Trump’s desire to bar transgender people from the military. This month, they had all watched her evade questions and defend a Trump policy that caused migrant children to be separated from their parents.
“Tell me what you want me to do. I can ask her to leave,” Wilkinson told her staff, she said. “They said yes.”
It was important to Wilkinson, she said, that Sanders had already been served — that her staff had not simply refused her on sight. And it was important to her that Sanders was a public official, not just a customer with whom she disagreed, many of whom were included in her regular clientele.
All the same, she was tense as she walked up to the press secretary’s chair.
“I said, ‘I’m the owner,’ ” she recalled, ” ‘I’d like you to come out to the patio with me for a word.’ ”
They stepped outside, into another small enclosure, but at least out of the crowded restaurant.
“I was babbling a little, but I got my point across in a polite and direct fashion,” Wilkinson said. “I explained that the restaurant has certain standards that I feel it has to uphold, such as honesty, and compassion, and cooperation.
“I said, ‘I’d like to ask you to leave.’ ”
Wilkinson didn’t know how Sanders would react, or whether Trump’s chief spokeswoman had been called out in a restaurant before — as the president’s homeland security secretary had been days earlier.
Sanders’s response was immediate, Wilkinson said: ” ‘ That’s fine. I’ll go.’ ”
Sanders went back to the table, picked up her things and walked out. The others at her table had been welcome to stay, Wilkinson said. But they didn’t, so the servers cleared away the cheese plates and glasses.
“They offered to pay,” Wilkinson said. “I said, ‘No. It’s on the house.’ ”
At the end of the shift, Wilkinson said, staff members left the usual overnight note in the kitchen for the morning manager: a problem with the credit card machine. Restock vodka and tequila.
If you’ve ever heard the term “to 86 someone,” it comes from the restaurant industry — code for table eviction.
“86 – Sara Huckabee Sanders,” read the note, below the reminder to buy more Pellegrino.
One of the servers photographed the whiteboard before going home Friday. He had posted it to his public Facebook wall by the time Wilkinson woke up Saturday. For all the angst that evening, Wilkinson said, everything had taken place with decorum. She had been polite; Sanders had been polite; the press secretary’s family had been polite as they followed her out the door.
Not so much the rest of the world, as it discovered Red Hen waiter Jaike Foley-Schultz’s post: “I just served Sarah huckabee sanders for a total of 2 minutes before my owner asked her to leave.”
A fountain of alternately celebratory and outraged comments gushed from Foley-Schultz’s Facebook wall into the Red Hen’s social media accounts, then its Yelp review page.
Five stars: “Thank you for refusing to serve a person who lies to the American people for a living.”
One star: “They made some snide remark about a ‘spit souffle’ for the Florida nazi.’”
Between the fury and fawning of 2,000 people who almost certainly had not eaten at the restaurant, the Red Hen’s Yelp reviews almost instantly averaged out to two-and-a-half stars. Another Red Hen in Washington was at pains to make clear that it had no affiliation with Wilkinson’s place.
And that was before Sanders confirmed the story in a late morning tweet, including the restaurant’s name and location.
“I always do my best to treat people, including those I disagree with, respectfully and will continue to do so,” the press secretary wrote. “Her actions say far more about her than about me.”
Wilkinson doesn’t know where all this will leave the Red Hen when the news coverage dies down — or even when it opens again for dinner Saturday, for that matter.
Wilkinson was on her way to a Main Street festival before then. She had helped organize it — under one of the other hats she wears around Lexington, besides politically conscious restaurateur. She wasn’t sure what her neighbors would have to say about the news.
“This is a small enough town, and we’re known,” she said optimistically. “This is not going to be a giant surprise to anyone.”
But even as she spoke, “Red Hen” was trending toward the top of Twitter, national photographers were en route to the restaurant, and conservatives were calling for protests and boycotts, or trolling its reservation line, while liberals suggested campaigns to reward it.
“Whatever happens, we will soldier on,” Wilkinson said.
And she added: “Absolutely, yes, I would have done the same thing again. . . . We just felt there are moments in time when people need to live their convictions. This appeared to be one.”It makes no sense to defend someone for upholding their convictions in one instance BECAUSE you agree with them and demonize someone for doing the same in another simply BECAUSE you disagree with them. Either EVERYONE has the right to refuse service, or no one does. As stated in the other topic, if you offer dinner service/wedding cake to everyone, you're required to serve dinner/bake a wedding cake to everyone. Not just those you agree with politically/spiritually. You can't have it both ways depending on who you agree with. Class.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 9:58:33 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2018 10:35:30 GMT
Some people (illegal immigrants) ignore our laws. Just saying. You do realize that illegal immigration is a misdeamenor. And that appearing at the border asking for asylum is allowed. In contrast, using the office of Potus for personal gain, insider trading (Wilber Ross), misappropriation of governments funds (Munuchin, Pruitt), lying under oath (Sessions), lying on security clearance forms 3 times (Kushner), working with foreign agents (the whole damn clan) are all Felonies.
But I understand, IOKIYRR. Whataboutism. IOIYAD
|
|