Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 20, 2024 19:24:15 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2018 21:22:17 GMT
Jennifer Jacobs...
No mention of John McCain by any of the speakers at Trump event to sign act named in honor of McCain.
Trump omitted McCain from the title, calling it “the national defense authorization act.”
From Bloomberg..
“President Donald Trump signed defense legislation named for Senator John McCain in a splashy ceremony at a New York Army base on Monday without once mentioning the ailing Arizona Republican’s name.
Trump traveled to Fort Drum, New York, from his golf resort in Bedminster, New Jersey, to sign the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act, the fiscal 2019 version of legislation Congress passes annually to set priorities for the military. He was joined by Vice President Mike Pence, who traveled separately from Washington.
In an unusual ceremony, Trump and Pence observed soldiers from the 10th Mountain Division perform an artillery drill as attack helicopters hovered overhead before delivering speeches from a stage festooned with flags and military hardware.”
How rude and classless and petty. Traits we should never see in a president. But yet...
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 20, 2024 19:24:15 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2018 21:38:26 GMT
Oh, I thought that's what you were doing... "It mattered to you when you thought it was a Republican who started the Steele dossier. Turns out it wasn't. That was on Clinton and now it suddenly doesn't matter. Funny how that works." Guess she has a kindred spirit in you too. Your trying to make the Republican research and the Clinton research two different and seperate actions when in fact the Clinton research was a continuation of the Republican research. And the fact that if the Republican had continued, and the Clinton campaign had never been involved, the end result would have still produced the Steele Dossier. You really should read the Fusion Congressional Hearing transcripts. They are separate actions, despite you trying to link The Washington Free Beacon with Hillary Clinton they had nothing to do with each other. The republican had stopped his research when Clinton picked it up. Then you're going with if this had happened then this. Well it didn't happen, so no, I'll stick with the facts of what did happen, thank you.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Aug 13, 2018 21:45:46 GMT
Clinton research was a continuation of the Republican research. And the fact that if the Republican had continued, and the Clinton campaign had never been involved, the end result would have still produced the Steele Dossier. You really should read the Fusion Congressional Hearing transcripts. That's what I read!
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 20, 2024 19:24:15 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2018 21:58:47 GMT
Your trying to make the Republican research and the Clinton research two different and seperate actions when in fact the Clinton research was a continuation of the Republican research. And the fact that if the Republican had continued, and the Clinton campaign had never been involved, the end result would have still produced the Steele Dossier. You really should read the Fusion Congressional Hearing transcripts. They are separate actions, despite you trying to link The Washington Free Beacon with Hillary Clinton they had nothing to do with each other. The republican had stopped his research when Clinton picked it up. Then you're going with if this had happened then this. Well it didn't happen, so no, I'll stick with the facts of what did happen, thank you. Yes that is correct. Clinton continued with the research the Republican started and dropped. It’s a continuation, not two separate things. That is a fact. What at do you think happened? Once the Republican ended their relationship with Fusion, Fusion dumped the research they had done on trump and started new research? That makes no sense if you do.
|
|
imsirius
Prolific Pea
Call it as I see it.
Posts: 7,661
Location: Floating in the black veil.
Jul 12, 2014 19:59:28 GMT
|
Post by imsirius on Aug 13, 2018 22:34:26 GMT
Posted to him on his twitter
To believe the .@gop & Trump you have to be gullible enough to believe this preposterous story
First Clinton had to be clairvoyant and know Sessions would recuse himself and Trump would appoint Rosenstein and he would then appoint Muller
Then Clinton would pay Fusion GPS to pay Steele to pay the Russians to hack her emails and release them on WikiLeaks so she would lose the election
She solicited the aid of all the flipped witnesses, the UK, France, the Dutch, Five eyes (Multi-national intel Agency),
The entire FISA court, the DSA and CIA
Then she got 2 FBI agents to influence or silence the entire FBI so all of these people could fram Trump
This story insults my intelligence
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Aug 13, 2018 22:39:04 GMT
Well he has done it again........... Mentioned Sen John McCain today........ Nay dt find his hell after is treatment of John McCain Trump rips McCain hours after signing bill named after himBY AVERY ANAPOL - 08/13/18 06:22 PM EDT Trump rips McCain hours after signing bill named after him President Trump hit Sen. John McCain in a speech hours after signing a defense bill named after the Arizona Republican. Trump, speaking at a New York fundraising event, sarcastically referred to McCain as “one of our wonderful senators,” and referenced McCain’s key vote against a proposed "skinny" repeal of the Affordable Care Act. “ObamaCare, we got rid of the individual mandate, which is the most unpopular aspect,” Trump said. “I would’ve gotten rid of everything, but as you know, one of our wonderful senators said ‘thumbs down’ at 2 o'clock in the morning.” The comment prompted a small chorus of boos from the audience. more at link: thehill.com/homenews/administration/401663-trump-rips-mccain-hours-after-signing-bill-named-after-him
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 20, 2024 19:24:15 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2018 22:42:46 GMT
What at do you think happened? Once the Republican ended their relationship with Fusion, Fusion dumped the research they had done on trump and started new research? The republican dropped the research and Clinton picked it up. Only then did they use the Russian for research. That means that the republican did not use the Russian for his research.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Aug 13, 2018 22:58:02 GMT
Posted to him on his twitter To believe the .@gop & Trump you have to be gullible enough to believe this preposterous story First Clinton had to be clairvoyant and know Sessions would recuse himself and Trump would appoint Rosenstein and he would then appoint Muller Then Clinton would pay Fusion GPS to pay Steele to pay the Russians to hack her emails and release them on WikiLeaks so she would lose the election She solicited the aid of all the flipped witnesses, the UK, France, the Dutch, Five eyes (Multi-national intel Agency), The entire FISA court, the DSA and CIA Then she got 2 FBI agents to influence or silence the entire FBI so all of these people could fram Trump This story insults my intelligence And, according to the tweet, HE fired Strzok. Not the IG. Entirely politically motivated. I guarantee you that you'll find personal texts about political opinions on the work-owned devices of many members of the DOJ. Because even members of the DOJ are human and mix work with their personal lives as we all do. So folks can spare me the tripe above about violating the core values of the FBI. Bull shit. This is a prime example of someone who opposed Trump being hung out to dry for something that lots of other people in similar positions have done. Kind of like, oh, Hillary being threatened with imprisonment for careless handling of classified information exactly like every Secretary of State in the modern era and the Bush administration did. I guarantee you that Trump pressured or ordered the IG's office to fire Strzok, so they gave their "reasons" knowing that there are hundreds of other FBI agents also "guilty" of having a negative opinion about Trump and sharing it with a personal contact. Folks who have been crowing about the Democrats regretting using the nuclear option should remember that all this shit goes both ways. Bet they won't be so snappy about "core values" when the next Democratic president decides to take revenge on his or her political opponents by depriving them of their jobs and retirements. And anyone who doesn't see the dangerous slide into autocracy with this has their head stuck far, far up their ass. What's particularly stupid in this case is that Trump makes himself look more and more guilty with every tweet and every firing. He looked guilty with Comey, and he looks guilty now. When - not if, but when - he finally bullies Sessions into firing Rosenstein, we'll know for sure they have enough stuff on him to put him away for life.
|
|
imsirius
Prolific Pea
Call it as I see it.
Posts: 7,661
Location: Floating in the black veil.
Jul 12, 2014 19:59:28 GMT
|
Post by imsirius on Aug 13, 2018 23:03:47 GMT
But Trump already admitted this was true.
Is Guliani saying Trump will perjure himself under oath?
|
|
imsirius
Prolific Pea
Call it as I see it.
Posts: 7,661
Location: Floating in the black veil.
Jul 12, 2014 19:59:28 GMT
|
Post by imsirius on Aug 13, 2018 23:07:43 GMT
Here's live tweets from Daniel Dale about Trump's speech in NY. SO MANY LIES,
Scroll up for thread...
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 20, 2024 19:24:15 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2018 23:46:13 GMT
Posted to him on his twitter To believe the .@gop & Trump you have to be gullible enough to believe this preposterous story First Clinton had to be clairvoyant and know Sessions would recuse himself and Trump would appoint Rosenstein and he would then appoint Muller Then Clinton would pay Fusion GPS to pay Steele to pay the Russians to hack her emails and release them on WikiLeaks so she would lose the election She solicited the aid of all the flipped witnesses, the UK, France, the Dutch, Five eyes (Multi-national intel Agency), The entire FISA court, the DSA and CIA Then she got 2 FBI agents to influence or silence the entire FBI so all of these people could fram Trump This story insults my intelligence And, according to the tweet, HE fired Strzok. Not the IG. Entirely politically motivated. I guarantee you that you'll find personal texts about political opinions on the work-owned devices of many members of the DOJ. Because even members of the DOJ are human and mix work with their personal lives as we all do. So folks can spare me the tripe above about violating the core values of the FBI. Bull shit. This is a prime example of someone who opposed Trump being hung out to dry for something that lots of other people in similar positions have done. Kind of like, oh, Hillary being threatened with imprisonment for careless handling of classified information exactly like every Secretary of State in the modern era and the Bush administration did. I guarantee you that Trump pressured or ordered the IG's office to fire Strzok, so they gave their "reasons" knowing that there are hundreds of other FBI agents also "guilty" of having a negative opinion about Trump and sharing it with a personal contact. Folks who have been crowing about the Democrats regretting using the nuclear option should remember that all this shit goes both ways. Bet they won't be so snappy about "core values" when the next Democratic president decides to take revenge on his or her political opponents by depriving them of their jobs and retirements. And anyone who doesn't see the dangerous slide into autocracy with this has their head stuck far, far up their ass. What's particularly stupid in this case is that Trump makes himself look more and more guilty with every tweet and every firing. He looked guilty with Comey, and he looks guilty now. When - not if, but when - he finally bullies Sessions into firing Rosenstein, we'll know for sure they have enough stuff on him to put him away for life. I can't help but notice how different the reaction is and how easily the excuses flow when it's someone you side with.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 20, 2024 19:24:15 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2018 23:52:00 GMT
Here's live tweets from Daniel Dale about Trump's speech in NY. SO MANY LIES, Scroll up for thread... Foreign Steel(e) can be bad? For him I'm sure he is!
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Aug 14, 2018 0:10:12 GMT
I’m curious how the economy really is, particularly in rural areas that rely on farming. I visited my mom in Iowa this weekend. They are looking to buy a new car in the next year or so. When out looking, several dealers have said that business is very slow right now. They even had a car salesperson that they worked with a few years ago call them randomly. She said that she was calling all of her old contacts (they didn’t even buy a car from her in the past, just we’re interested in one) because business was really bad. Then they went to a furniture store and were told there that business was really slow as well. That people aren’t even coming into the store because farmers are hesitant to spend any money. Clearly that affects all business in the area.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Aug 14, 2018 0:27:29 GMT
And, according to the tweet, HE fired Strzok. Not the IG. Entirely politically motivated. I guarantee you that you'll find personal texts about political opinions on the work-owned devices of many members of the DOJ. Because even members of the DOJ are human and mix work with their personal lives as we all do. So folks can spare me the tripe above about violating the core values of the FBI. Bull shit. This is a prime example of someone who opposed Trump being hung out to dry for something that lots of other people in similar positions have done. Kind of like, oh, Hillary being threatened with imprisonment for careless handling of classified information exactly like every Secretary of State in the modern era and the Bush administration did. I guarantee you that Trump pressured or ordered the IG's office to fire Strzok, so they gave their "reasons" knowing that there are hundreds of other FBI agents also "guilty" of having a negative opinion about Trump and sharing it with a personal contact. Folks who have been crowing about the Democrats regretting using the nuclear option should remember that all this shit goes both ways. Bet they won't be so snappy about "core values" when the next Democratic president decides to take revenge on his or her political opponents by depriving them of their jobs and retirements. And anyone who doesn't see the dangerous slide into autocracy with this has their head stuck far, far up their ass. What's particularly stupid in this case is that Trump makes himself look more and more guilty with every tweet and every firing. He looked guilty with Comey, and he looks guilty now. When - not if, but when - he finally bullies Sessions into firing Rosenstein, we'll know for sure they have enough stuff on him to put him away for life. I can't help but notice how different the reaction is and how easily the excuses flow when it's someone you side with. Back atcha, babe. Can't wait to hear you howl when the next president starts cleaning house. I hope the next Democrat sends the GOP back to the stone age where all the racist, misogynist regressives belong. What goes around, comes around, and the next administration isn't going to be pretty for y'all.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 20, 2024 19:24:15 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 14, 2018 0:33:58 GMT
I can't help but notice how different the reaction is and how easily the excuses flow when it's someone you side with. Back atcha, babe. Can't wait to hear you howl when the next president starts cleaning house. I'm responding to reality and you're coming up with hypotheticals to lob back at me. You're not really proving anything about me with hypotheticals.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 20, 2024 19:24:15 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 14, 2018 0:35:13 GMT
Ed Solomon...
“The President of the United States hires someone he thinks is unstable & who he’d fired 3 times into the White House because “she said great things” about him and “begged” for the job. And they get mad because Hillary *might* have jeopardized security using a private server.”
Go figure.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Aug 14, 2018 0:36:04 GMT
Back atcha, babe. Can't wait to hear you howl when the next president starts cleaning house. I'm responding to reality and you're coming up with hypotheticals to lob back at me. You're not really proving anything about me with hypotheticals. What reality? Fun fact: I don't give a shit about you. I give a shit about the idiot criminal in the White House. The one you're here defending.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 20, 2024 19:24:15 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 14, 2018 0:42:24 GMT
I'm responding to reality and you're coming up with hypotheticals to lob back at me. You're not really proving anything about me with hypotheticals. What reality? Fun fact: I don't give a shit about you. I give a shit about the idiot criminal in the White House. The one you're here defending. Noticing the difference in response based on whether you side with someone or not is not defending anyone. I give a shit about finding the truth in the Russian collusion investigation and you can't do that when the lead investigator has already made up his mind on the outcome. You know, the one you're defending.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 20, 2024 19:24:15 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 14, 2018 0:51:24 GMT
I can't help but notice how different the reaction is and how easily the excuses flow when it's someone you side with. I can’t decide if you are really as obtuse as you seem or are you are being deliberately obtuse as a way to poke the liberals on this thread. Which is it?
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Aug 14, 2018 0:53:56 GMT
What reality? Fun fact: I don't give a shit about you. I give a shit about the idiot criminal in the White House. The one you're here defending. Noticing the difference in response based on whether you side with someone or not is not defending anyone. I give a shit about finding the truth in the Russian collusion investigation and you can't do that when the lead investigator has already made up his mind on the outcome. You know, the one you're defending. Rosenstein, the Republican, appointed by a Republican, with a sterling reputation for integrity ... has made up his mind against Trump? You're as insane as Trump is. I also like how you're accusing me of what you are doing (different responses based on whether you agree with the person accused) - just like your guy. You're both delusional. You started that thread about the Democrat in Dallas accused of fraud to try to "catch" us in the kind of double standard you play yourself, and no one bit, so now you're here making shit up. Please show where I have a "difference in response." You're the one willing to excuse behavior in others that you think Hillary and Strzok should be punished for - not me. Also, you still haven't cited the text where Strzok said he was willing to take some sort of official action against Trump. I'll wait.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 20, 2024 19:24:15 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 14, 2018 0:54:11 GMT
MSNBC...
“During boardroom outtakes, Donald talked about Obama often. He hated him. He never explained why, but now I believe it was because Obama was black."
— Omarosa Manigault Newman in her new book”
This I believe.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Aug 14, 2018 0:54:30 GMT
I can't help but notice how different the reaction is and how easily the excuses flow when it's someone you side with. I can’t decide if you are really as obtuse as you seem or are you are being deliberately obtuse as a way to poke the liberals on this thread. Which is it? Yes. It's both. I'm out. She can play her crazy game all by herself.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 20, 2024 19:24:15 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 14, 2018 0:56:32 GMT
I can't help but notice how different the reaction is and how easily the excuses flow when it's someone you side with. I can’t decide if you are really as obtuse as you seem or are you are being deliberately obtuse as a way to poke the liberals on this thread. Which is it? What is it that you think I don't understand?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 20, 2024 19:24:15 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 14, 2018 1:01:54 GMT
I can’t decide if you are really as obtuse as you seem or are you are being deliberately obtuse as a way to poke the liberals on this thread. Which is it? What is it that you think I don't understand? And you are?
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Aug 14, 2018 1:05:10 GMT
What is it that you think I don't understand? And you are? Oh, that's hilarious - created another alter, forgot to switch back. The very best people.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 20, 2024 19:24:15 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 14, 2018 1:10:20 GMT
Oh, that's hilarious - created another alter, forgot to switch back. The very best people. Not exactly as it would seem, but that won't really matter to you.
|
|
samantha25
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,052
Jun 27, 2014 19:06:19 GMT
|
Post by samantha25 on Aug 14, 2018 1:12:39 GMT
What is it that you think I don't understand? And you are? @fred .... let it go... let's discuss what's happening, don't engage. You won't dissuade "it's" thoughts. Only here to provoke.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Sept 20, 2024 19:24:15 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 14, 2018 1:20:03 GMT
@fred .... let it go... let's discuss what's happening, don't engage. You won't dissuade "it's" thoughts. Only here to provoke. That's the problem here. Any diversion from group think is wrong somehow.
|
|
imsirius
Prolific Pea
Call it as I see it.
Posts: 7,661
Location: Floating in the black veil.
Jul 12, 2014 19:59:28 GMT
|
Post by imsirius on Aug 14, 2018 1:24:30 GMT
I can’t decide if you are really as obtuse as you seem or are you are being deliberately obtuse as a way to poke the liberals on this thread. Which is it? What is it that you think I don't understand? Ohhh..outed herself. This is the anti Trump thread..I think you're lost..the conservative thread is pretty much dead so now you come here to “talk/look for a fight?” Nobody will bite.
|
|
imsirius
Prolific Pea
Call it as I see it.
Posts: 7,661
Location: Floating in the black veil.
Jul 12, 2014 19:59:28 GMT
|
Post by imsirius on Aug 14, 2018 1:37:44 GMT
In response to this.
|
|