|
Post by elaine on Jan 15, 2023 4:46:55 GMT
Your words, not mine. "Nobody cares" In case it's not clear - religion, where he worked, where his money comes from are all lies that Santos told. I quoted her and assumed when she said “my religion, where I work” etc., she was referring to herself. My mistake. I continued to be embarrassed for you due to your utter ignorance of common knowledge politics on display. Stop posting until you actually read something other than FOX. Although, the fact that you don’t know even the basics about something that everyone who watches Good Morning America - or other basic abc, nbc, or cbs popular news shows - knows about, should make you realize that you aren’t as knowledgeable as you think you are about a wide variety of topics - not just Santos.
|
|
samantha25
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,892
Jun 27, 2014 19:06:19 GMT
|
Post by samantha25 on Jan 15, 2023 4:48:55 GMT
And don't forget his white supremacy sign when voting.. he is a total fake, hoax, only the best get elected Well duh.... I'm the one who posted that picture .. so much has happened with him it is hard to keep up.. Exactly and not sure if Santos is his last name. How can someone, whether Repub or Dem not get vetted for a position. Wnat a fake. Not sure if Cindosha has read about his ineptness, but should.
|
|
|
Post by peano on Jan 15, 2023 6:12:08 GMT
Your words, not mine. "Nobody cares" In case it's not clear - religion, where he worked, where his money comes from are all lies that Santos told. I quoted her and assumed when she said “my religion, where I work” etc., she was referring to herself. My mistake. And you missed my reference because you are/were totally ignorant of one of the biggest news stories of the past two weeks. How embarrassing for you.
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Jan 15, 2023 6:47:14 GMT
Your words, not mine. "Nobody cares" In case it's not clear - religion, where he worked, where his money comes from are all lies that Santos told. I quoted her and assumed when she said “my religion, where I work” etc., she was referring to herself. My mistake. Your mistake proved exactly what some of us have been saying- your Fox or right wing media bubble keeps you uninformed and ignorant of major news stories. Just because you have not heard of George Santos does not make the story of his lies insignificant or minor. Almost every major news organization, except for Fox apparently, has carried the story since NYT first broke the story around Dec 21. eta - a quick search on Fox shows that there are stories on Santos, admittedly with the Fox spin. And Santos doesn't have the hot topic button like the Biden classified documents. But, there are stories on Santos. Kind of begs the question - Do you actually watch, listen or read the news? www.foxnews.com/category/person/george-santos
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 29, 2024 3:29:41 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 15, 2023 7:34:50 GMT
I know why she hadn't heard of George Santos now. His name is actually Anthony Devolder Much like Trump being John Barron.
|
|
|
Post by hop2 on Jan 15, 2023 12:16:20 GMT
Wow, this is the ignorance that will plug its ears and sing la la la while everything burns down around it. I guess that’s a standard answer when you don’t have a good argument. I don’t see anything burning down. Except the fact that you’re pissed that Republicans have the house. 🤷🏻♀️ Did I mention you? But I guess since you think the shoe fits….
|
|
|
Post by cindosha on Jan 15, 2023 13:15:16 GMT
I quoted her and assumed when she said “my religion, where I work” etc., she was referring to herself. My mistake. Your mistake proved exactly what some of us have been saying- your Fox or right wing media bubble keeps you uninformed and ignorant of major news stories. Just because you have not heard of George Santos does not make the story of his lies insignificant or minor. Almost every major news organization, except for Fox apparently, has carried the story since NYT first broke the story around Dec 21. eta - a quick search on Fox shows that there are stories on Santos, admittedly with the Fox spin. And Santos doesn't have the hot topic button like the Biden classified documents. But, there are stories on Santos. Kind of begs the question - Do you actually watch, listen or read the news? www.foxnews.com/category/person/george-santosAgain, I said if he lied, there needs to be consequences for him and every other politician who has lied. I didn’t dispute that. I still don’t see what everyone Is getting all bent out of shape about. Your own president is a liar. Pelosi is a liar….all politicians lie. If they lie there should be consequences. Whats the problem.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Jan 15, 2023 14:25:17 GMT
Oh my, more from Santos or whoever he is!?!?!?
After facing considerable criticism in the brief time he's been in his position, this latest piece of the puzzle comes after Santos had to answer for why he lied on his resume, why he lied about his mom dying on 9/11, and several other trip-ups.
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Jan 15, 2023 15:50:55 GMT
Your mistake proved exactly what some of us have been saying- your Fox or right wing media bubble keeps you uninformed and ignorant of major news stories. Just because you have not heard of George Santos does not make the story of his lies insignificant or minor. Almost every major news organization, except for Fox apparently, has carried the story since NYT first broke the story around Dec 21. eta - a quick search on Fox shows that there are stories on Santos, admittedly with the Fox spin. And Santos doesn't have the hot topic button like the Biden classified documents. But, there are stories on Santos. Kind of begs the question - Do you actually watch, listen or read the news? www.foxnews.com/category/person/george-santosAgain, I said if he lied, there needs to be consequences for him and every other politician who has lied. I didn’t dispute that. I still don’t see what everyone Is getting all bent out of shape about. Your own president is a liar. Pelosi is a liar….all politicians lie. If they lie there should be consequences. Whats the problem. The problem isn't just that he lied about his entire resume and background- he lied about where he went to school, where he worked, his religion, his mother's death, the fact that he was married to a woman etc. There are questions about his citizenship and if he is even qualified to be a Representative. He's under investigation in Brazil and might be charged again with issuing fraudulent checks. He may have used campaign funds for personal expenses. In 2020, his reported income was $55,000 per year an no assets. Somehow, just 2 years later, he had $700,000 to loan his campaign. A cousin of a sanctioned Russian oligarch, a migrant smuggler and a big Trump donor donated to his campaign. Accepting donations from foreign nationals who are not US citizens is a crime. His campaign finances are under investigation. McCarthy is so desperate for votes, he refuses to ask Santos to resign despite other NY Republicans calling for Santos' resignation. thehill.com/homenews/house/3791402-george-santos-under-federal-investigation-over-finances-reports/www.cbsnews.com/news/george-santos-donors-what-we-know/www.nytimes.com/2023/01/02/nyregion/george-santos-brazil.html
|
|
|
Post by femalebusiness on Jan 15, 2023 16:51:59 GMT
Your mistake proved exactly what some of us have been saying- your Fox or right wing media bubble keeps you uninformed and ignorant of major news stories. Just because you have not heard of George Santos does not make the story of his lies insignificant or minor. Almost every major news organization, except for Fox apparently, has carried the story since NYT first broke the story around Dec 21. eta - a quick search on Fox shows that there are stories on Santos, admittedly with the Fox spin. And Santos doesn't have the hot topic button like the Biden classified documents. But, there are stories on Santos. Kind of begs the question - Do you actually watch, listen or read the news? www.foxnews.com/category/person/george-santosAgain, I said if he lied, there needs to be consequences for him and every other politician who has lied. I didn’t dispute that. I still don’t see what everyone Is getting all bent out of shape about. Your own president is a liar. Pelosi is a liar….all politicians lie. If they lie there should be consequences. Whats the problem. No one is bent out of shape, just laughing AGAIN at what an ignorant fool you are. Your posts are always good for a laugh. I have actually started feeling sorry for you as most people in your real life probably avoid you like the plague.
|
|
|
Post by cindosha on Jan 15, 2023 20:43:01 GMT
Again, I said if he lied, there needs to be consequences for him and every other politician who has lied. I didn’t dispute that. I still don’t see what everyone Is getting all bent out of shape about. Your own president is a liar. Pelosi is a liar….all politicians lie. If they lie there should be consequences. Whats the problem. The problem isn't just that he lied about his entire resume and background- he lied about where he went to school, where he worked, his religion, his mother's death, the fact that he was married to a woman etc. There are questions about his citizenship and if he is even qualified to be a Representative. He's under investigation in Brazil and might be charged again with issuing fraudulent checks. He may have used campaign funds for personal expenses. In 2020, his reported income was $55,000 per year an no assets. Somehow, just 2 years later, he had $700,000 to loan his campaign. A cousin of a sanctioned Russian oligarch, a migrant smuggler and a big Trump donor donated to his campaign. Accepting donations from foreign nationals who are not US citizens is a crime. His campaign finances are under investigation. McCarthy is so desperate for votes, he refuses to ask Santos to resign despite other NY Republicans calling for Santos' resignation. thehill.com/homenews/house/3791402-george-santos-under-federal-investigation-over-finances-reports/www.cbsnews.com/news/george-santos-donors-what-we-know/www.nytimes.com/2023/01/02/nyregion/george-santos-brazil.htmlI guess I didn’t find it a major news story. I never said there shouldn’t be consequences. In fact I said just the opposite. I never disputed anything anyone said. They will boot him. Eventually. You think politicians don’t use campaign funds for personal use? They are all a bunch of liars, cheats and criminals. There is so much money laundering in politics, it’s laughable. We should get rid of all the liars, including your president who told just as many lies. Sounds like an overreaching deflection of fjb’s classified document scandal IMO.
|
|
|
Post by cindosha on Jan 15, 2023 20:52:38 GMT
Again, I said if he lied, there needs to be consequences for him and every other politician who has lied. I didn’t dispute that. I still don’t see what everyone Is getting all bent out of shape about. Your own president is a liar. Pelosi is a liar….all politicians lie. If they lie there should be consequences. Whats the problem. No one is bent out of shape, just laughing AGAIN at what an ignorant fool you are. Your posts are always good for a laugh. I have actually started feeling sorry for you as most people in your real life probably avoid you like the plague. You are bent out of shape that I didn’t care about a santos news story. Otherwise you wouldn’t have responded. Big deal. I guess I found fjb classified documents shitshow way more interesting/funny/entertaining, along with the whole ban gas stove idiocy. Maybe you should put me on ignore so you don’t have to feel sorry for me anymore. Or you can keep reading my posts for your entertainment. That’s what I do here with your posts.
|
|
|
Post by Gem Girl on Jan 15, 2023 20:59:49 GMT
Your uninformed, ignorant statements reflect Fox's narrow, biased viewpoint. Absolutely nothing I said was uninformed or ignorant. I simply stated that I hadn’t read anything on santos. Which I haven’t. Again, I said if It didn’t interest me, I didn’t read about it. I also said, if you read my original statement about it, that if he lies there should be consequences. I never disputed THAT he lied. I implied that ALL politicians lie. Which isn’t a lie. Fox's narrow, biased viewpoint. All news stations viewpoints are narrow and biased. They cater to whomever watches that particular source. what’s the problem? There's a cure for that, if you believe it--watch a wide variety of news sources. I personally watch MSNBC, CNN, PBS, BBC, & Al Jazeera. I think that makes my viewing, "Fair and Balanced."
|
|
|
Post by Gem Girl on Jan 15, 2023 21:02:24 GMT
Oh my, more from Santos or whoever he is!?!?!? After facing considerable criticism in the brief time he's been in his position, this latest piece of the puzzle comes after Santos had to answer for why he lied on his resume, why he lied about his mom dying on 9/11, and several other trip-ups. They had no problem with Trump's seeming to be in Putin's pocket, either.
|
|
|
Post by elaine on Jan 15, 2023 21:05:20 GMT
The problem isn't just that he lied about his entire resume and background- he lied about where he went to school, where he worked, his religion, his mother's death, the fact that he was married to a woman etc. There are questions about his citizenship and if he is even qualified to be a Representative. He's under investigation in Brazil and might be charged again with issuing fraudulent checks. He may have used campaign funds for personal expenses. In 2020, his reported income was $55,000 per year an no assets. Somehow, just 2 years later, he had $700,000 to loan his campaign. A cousin of a sanctioned Russian oligarch, a migrant smuggler and a big Trump donor donated to his campaign. Accepting donations from foreign nationals who are not US citizens is a crime. His campaign finances are under investigation. McCarthy is so desperate for votes, he refuses to ask Santos to resign despite other NY Republicans calling for Santos' resignation. thehill.com/homenews/house/3791402-george-santos-under-federal-investigation-over-finances-reports/www.cbsnews.com/news/george-santos-donors-what-we-know/www.nytimes.com/2023/01/02/nyregion/george-santos-brazil.htmlI guess I didn’t find it a major news story. I never said there shouldn’t be consequences. In fact I said just the opposite. I never disputed anything anyone said. They will boot him. Eventually. You think politicians don’t use campaign funds for personal use? They are all a bunch of liars, cheats and criminals. There is so much money laundering in politics, it’s laughable. We should get rid of all the liars, including your president who told just as many lies. Sounds like an overreaching deflection of fjb’s classified document scandal IMO. You are such a liar. You didn’t even know who Santos was until this thread. It wasn’t that you didn’t find it a major news story - you didn’t even know about it. Read your own words. No twisting going on. And, if you actually followed real news, you’d know that it started over a month before the documents were discovered in Biden’s possession. So, not a deflection, as it preceded that scandal. We just continue to care about it because it is such blatant fraud - way beyond typical politician lying: Santos’ lies are pathological in nature. That you feel anyone should take your opinions on political threads seriously is a joke. Your ignorance on display in this thread is staggering.
|
|
|
Post by sideways on Jan 15, 2023 21:43:47 GMT
It can’t be that big if I missed it. I did however, not miss the story about the hypocrisy of the classified documents in bidens garage where hunter was staying and had complete access to. Just another confirmation that your head is so far up your ass that you can’t see reality.
|
|
|
Post by cindosha on Jan 15, 2023 21:45:32 GMT
I guess I didn’t find it a major news story. I never said there shouldn’t be consequences. In fact I said just the opposite. I never disputed anything anyone said. They will boot him. Eventually. You think politicians don’t use campaign funds for personal use? They are all a bunch of liars, cheats and criminals. There is so much money laundering in politics, it’s laughable. We should get rid of all the liars, including your president who told just as many lies. Sounds like an overreaching deflection of fjb’s classified document scandal IMO. You are such a liar. You didn’t even know who Santos was until this thread. It wasn’t that you didn’t find it a major news story - you didn’t even know about it. Read your own words. No twisting going on. And, if you actually followed real news, you’d know that it started over a month before the documents were discovered in Biden’s possession. So, not a deflection, as it preceded that scandal. We just continue to care about it because it is such blatant fraud - way beyond typical politician lying: Santos’ lies are pathological in nature. That you feel anyone should take your opinions on political threads seriously is a joke. Your ignorance on display in this thread is staggering. I usually dislike responding to you and I haven’t in a long time, but I will make an exception today. I never lied about santos. I heard his name but didn’t read about him. Because it didn’t interest me. I still don’t care about him. As I said before, all politicians lie. One more or less doesn’t matter to me. You appear really triggered by the fact that I don’t know santos’ story. In my post about it I never lied about anything. I stated that I didn’t know anything about santos. That was true. I still haven’t read a news story about him. Because he doesn’t interest me. I also never stated that anyone needs to take my opinions seriously. I’m not sure how you worked that one out. Just because I post on here doesn’t mean you have to take it seriously. That’s on you.
|
|
|
Post by cindosha on Jan 15, 2023 21:48:10 GMT
Absolutely nothing I said was uninformed or ignorant. I simply stated that I hadn’t read anything on santos. Which I haven’t. Again, I said if It didn’t interest me, I didn’t read about it. I also said, if you read my original statement about it, that if he lies there should be consequences. I never disputed THAT he lied. I implied that ALL politicians lie. Which isn’t a lie. Fox's narrow, biased viewpoint . All news stations viewpoints are narrow and biased. They cater to whomever watches that particular source. what’s the problem? There's a cure for that, if you believe it--watch a wide variety of news sources. I personally watch MSNBC, CNN, PBS, BBC, & Al Jazeera. I think that makes my viewing, "Fair and Balanced." Boom!!
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Jan 15, 2023 21:48:48 GMT
Oh my, more from Santos or whoever he is!?!?!?
Not even a possible Russia asset? But I guess you didn't care about TFG and his love of Putin or his bank accounts in China!!
|
|
pinklady
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,505
Nov 14, 2016 23:47:03 GMT
|
Post by pinklady on Jan 15, 2023 22:02:29 GMT
All of you trying to reason with a mentally ill person look like fools.
|
|
|
Post by cindosha on Jan 15, 2023 22:03:14 GMT
Oh my, more from Santos or whoever he is!?!?!? Not even a possible Russia asset? But I guess you didn't care about TFG and his love of Putin or his bank accounts in China!! sounds like that is someone's opinion..
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Jan 15, 2023 22:15:16 GMT
"George Santos introduced himself as Anthony Devolder" He said it, his voice...
|
|
|
Post by cindosha on Jan 15, 2023 22:26:31 GMT
"George Santos introduced himself as Anthony Devolder" He said it, his voice... I never once disputed that he lied. I’m sure he did.
|
|
|
Post by elaine on Jan 15, 2023 23:34:29 GMT
You are such a liar. You didn’t even know who Santos was until this thread. It wasn’t that you didn’t find it a major news story - you didn’t even know about it. Read your own words. No twisting going on. And, if you actually followed real news, you’d know that it started over a month before the documents were discovered in Biden’s possession. So, not a deflection, as it preceded that scandal. We just continue to care about it because it is such blatant fraud - way beyond typical politician lying: Santos’ lies are pathological in nature. That you feel anyone should take your opinions on political threads seriously is a joke. Your ignorance on display in this thread is staggering. I usually dislike responding to you and I haven’t in a long time, but I will make an exception today. I never lied about santos. I heard his name but didn’t read about him. Because it didn’t interest me. I still don’t care about him. As I said before, all politicians lie. One more or less doesn’t matter to me. You appear really triggered by the fact that I don’t know santos’ story. In my post about it I never lied about anything. I stated that I didn’t know anything about santos. That was true. I still haven’t read a news story about him. Because he doesn’t interest me. I also never stated that anyone needs to take my opinions seriously. I’m not sure how you worked that one out. Just because I post on here doesn’t mean you have to take it seriously. That’s on you. Nah, not triggered. I just find you fascinating. Why you come into political threads and comment on things that you clearly know nothing about and then double-down when called on it is beyond me. And, yeah, you lied. You said you knew nothing about Santos and then proved it with a number of your comments that made it truly evident that you knew *nothing* about him and his story (your comment to peano being the most blatant display of your utter cluelessness). It wasn’t that you read/heard about it and weren’t interested, you were (and maybe still are) completely ignorant, knowing nothing about him, his story, and why it is important. Although being proud of blatant ignorance is the modus operandi of the lunatic GOP house members who will fuck over the military and veterans, so you fit right in, I guess. 🤷♀️ I don’t care if you respond to me or not. Even less so now that the depths of your ignorance is on display. You do whatever floats your boat, and I’ll comment when I want to.
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Jan 16, 2023 0:11:19 GMT
You are such a liar. You didn’t even know who Santos was until this thread. It wasn’t that you didn’t find it a major news story - you didn’t even know about it. Read your own words. No twisting going on. And, if you actually followed real news, you’d know that it started over a month before the documents were discovered in Biden’s possession. So, not a deflection, as it preceded that scandal. We just continue to care about it because it is such blatant fraud - way beyond typical politician lying: Santos’ lies are pathological in nature. That you feel anyone should take your opinions on political threads seriously is a joke. Your ignorance on display in this thread is staggering. I usually dislike responding to you and I haven’t in a long time, but I will make an exception today. I never lied about santos. I heard his name but didn’t read about him. Because it didn’t interest me. I still don’t care about him. As I said before, all politicians lie. One more or less doesn’t matter to me. You appear really triggered by the fact that I don’t know santos’ story. In my post about it I never lied about anything. I stated that I didn’t know anything about santos. That was true. I still haven’t read a news story about him. Because he doesn’t interest me. I also never stated that anyone needs to take my opinions seriously. I’m not sure how you worked that one out. Just because I post on here doesn’t mean you have to take it seriously. That’s on you. Don't worry, I don't think anyone takes what you say seriously. Especially when your uninformed opinions are on full display, like in this thread.
|
|
|
Post by cindosha on Jan 16, 2023 2:17:43 GMT
I usually dislike responding to you and I haven’t in a long time, but I will make an exception today. I never lied about santos. I heard his name but didn’t read about him. Because it didn’t interest me. I still don’t care about him. As I said before, all politicians lie. One more or less doesn’t matter to me. You appear really triggered by the fact that I don’t know santos’ story. In my post about it I never lied about anything. I stated that I didn’t know anything about santos. That was true. I still haven’t read a news story about him. Because he doesn’t interest me. I also never stated that anyone needs to take my opinions seriously. I’m not sure how you worked that one out. Just because I post on here doesn’t mean you have to take it seriously. That’s on you. Nah, not triggered. I just find you fascinating. Why you come into political threads and comment on things that you clearly know nothing about and then double-down when called on it is beyond me. And, yeah, you lied. You said you knew nothing about Santos and then proved it with a number of your comments that made it truly evident that you knew *nothing* about him and his story (your comment to peano being the most blatant display of your utter cluelessness). It wasn’t that you read/heard about it and weren’t interested, you were (and maybe still are) completely ignorant, knowing nothing about him, his story, and why it is important. Although being proud of blatant ignorance is the modus operandi of the lunatic GOP house members who will fuck over the military and veterans, so you fit right in, I guess. 🤷♀️ I don’t care if you respond to me or not. Even less so now that the depths of your ignorance is on display. You do whatever floats your boat, and I’ll comment when I want to. Same.
|
|
|
Post by cindosha on Jan 16, 2023 2:18:40 GMT
I usually dislike responding to you and I haven’t in a long time, but I will make an exception today. I never lied about santos. I heard his name but didn’t read about him. Because it didn’t interest me. I still don’t care about him. As I said before, all politicians lie. One more or less doesn’t matter to me. You appear really triggered by the fact that I don’t know santos’ story. In my post about it I never lied about anything. I stated that I didn’t know anything about santos. That was true. I still haven’t read a news story about him. Because he doesn’t interest me. I also never stated that anyone needs to take my opinions seriously. I’m not sure how you worked that one out. Just because I post on here doesn’t mean you have to take it seriously. That’s on you. Don't worry, I don't think anyone takes what you say seriously. Especially when your uninformed opinions are on full display, like in this thread. I’m not worried. 🤣🤣
|
|
|
Post by elaine on Jan 16, 2023 4:21:59 GMT
Nah, not triggered. I just find you fascinating. Why you come into political threads and comment on things that you clearly know nothing about and then double-down when called on it is beyond me. And, yeah, you lied. You said you knew nothing about Santos and then proved it with a number of your comments that made it truly evident that you knew *nothing* about him and his story (your comment to peano being the most blatant display of your utter cluelessness). It wasn’t that you read/heard about it and weren’t interested, you were (and maybe still are) completely ignorant, knowing nothing about him, his story, and why it is important. Although being proud of blatant ignorance is the modus operandi of the lunatic GOP house members who will fuck over the military and veterans, so you fit right in, I guess. 🤷♀️ I don’t care if you respond to me or not. Even less so now that the depths of your ignorance is on display. You do whatever floats your boat, and I’ll comment when I want to. Same. Thank you for yet another unintelligible response that means absolutely nothing. Only the best and brightest support the current lunatics in the House trying to bring down the government and screw the military. 🤣🤣🤣
|
|
|
Post by cindosha on Jan 16, 2023 14:11:08 GMT
Thank you for yet another unintelligible response that means absolutely nothing. Only the best and brightest support the current lunatics in the House trying to bring down the government and screw the military. 🤣🤣🤣 You misspelled senate…..
|
|
|
Post by mollycoddle on Jan 16, 2023 14:22:20 GMT
There's a cure for that, if you believe it--watch a wide variety of news sources. I personally watch MSNBC, CNN, PBS, BBC, & Al Jazeera. I think that makes my viewing, "Fair and Balanced." Boom!! Here’s what genuinely bothers me; not about you per se, but in general. Mainstream media and conservative media often have very different stories, and yes, takes. This has concerned me for years, and that is why I read some conservative sources. IMO it is the only way to understand why we are where we are. I understand that many do not have the energy/will to read or watch the other side. I get it. But having two different media universes has led us to here. We are not in a good place.
|
|