|
Post by aj2hall on Jan 17, 2023 21:16:36 GMT
Why didn’t they destroy the documents nobody knew they had, that had been sitting around for 6 years? So what if the documents in question included information about Ukraine, Iran, & the UK? Your comment about lacking a moral compass & the Democrats reminded me of a back and forth between Hillary and trump during one of their debates. She called him a puppet. While she was still talking he said loudly “I’m not a puppet” and then as an afterthought said “You’re a puppet”. Meaning his only argument against Hillary’s comment was to claim she was the puppet. Kind of weak. In both cases. There is a belief by some that some of the actions trump took or tried to take made him Putin’s puppet. Especially when it came to NATO. I have no real knowledge of Hunter Biden other then he is a drug addict and he has a laptop that has a chain of custody problem. My comment was that you don’t like Hunter Biden therefore he is automatically guilty of any unnamed crimes that is separate from the stuff you listed above. I find it unbelievable that you, along with others, think that it would be okay to destroy classified documents simply because no one knew about them being missing. The NARA wouldn’t have known about the Trump docs either if someone hadn’t notified them. I’m pretty sure there’s no statue of limitations on how long you can have classified documents before it’s no big deal. Whether they were taken willfully or ‘inadvertently’ as Biden claims is irrelevant. Classified documents belong to the government and neither should have had them in there possession after leaving office. So you claim to have no real knowledge of Hunter Biden, does that mean you intentionally choose to be uninformed as cindosha was accused of being regarding Santos. That laptop and emails have been verified by The New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, NBC, CBS, MSNBC and a few others.
What exactly did Hunter Biden do that was illegal? Aside from possible tax evasion and a false statement about a gun purchase. What did the laptop reveal? The chain of custody of the laptop is sketchy and almost all of the media that looked at it acknowledged someone could have tampered with the laptop. Hunter Biden is not a government employee. How are the laptop or emails relevant to President Biden? Just a reminder, Hunter is already being investigated by a Trump appointee in the department of Justice. If he did something illegal, he should be treated the same as any other American. Republicans can't have it both ways. If you're criticizing Biden for his handling of classified documents, where is your criticism of Trump? If Hunter is guilty of tax evasion, where is your criticism of Trump whose company has now been found guilty of tax fraud? Neither situation is really a fair comparison, but it seems hypocritical and disingenuous for conservatives to criticize the Bidens when they refuse to criticize Trump for much bigger and more significant infractions. Furthermore, if you're questioning Hunter Biden's business dealings, where are your questions about Jared and Ivanka's business deals? Both of them actually worked for the White House. Why are conservatives ignoring their business dealings? Especially the $2 billion investment into Jared's new private equity fund, after it was found to be "unsatisfactory in all aspects"? www.pbs.org/newshour/show/massive-saudi-investment-raises-questions-about-jared-kushners-business-dealings
|
|
|
Post by cindosha on Jan 17, 2023 22:37:19 GMT
I find it unbelievable that you, along with others, think that it would be okay to destroy classified documents simply because no one knew about them being missing. The NARA wouldn’t have known about the Trump docs either if someone hadn’t notified them. I’m pretty sure there’s no statue of limitations on how long you can have classified documents before it’s no big deal. Whether they were taken willfully or ‘inadvertently’ as Biden claims is irrelevant. Classified documents belong to the government and neither should have had them in there possession after leaving office. So you claim to have no real knowledge of Hunter Biden, does that mean you intentionally choose to be uninformed as cindosha was accused of being regarding Santos. That laptop and emails have been verified by The New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, NBC, CBS, MSNBC and a few others.
What exactly did Hunter Biden do that was illegal? Aside from possible tax evasion and a false statement about a gun purchase. What did the laptop reveal? The chain of custody of the laptop is sketchy and almost all of the media that looked at it acknowledged someone could have tampered with the laptop. Hunter Biden is not a government employee. How are the laptop or emails relevant to President Biden? Just a reminder, Hunter is already being investigated by a Trump appointee in the department of Justice. If he did something illegal, he should be treated the same as any other American. Republicans can't have it both ways. If you're criticizing Biden for his handling of classified documents, where is your criticism of Trump? If Hunter is guilty of tax evasion, where is your criticism of Trump whose company has now been found guilty of tax fraud? Neither situation is really a fair comparison, but it seems hypocritical and disingenuous for conservatives to criticize the Bidens when they refuse to criticize Trump for much bigger and more significant infractions. Furthermore, if you're questioning Hunter Biden's business dealings, where are your questions about Jared and Ivanka's business deals? Both of them actually worked for the White House. Why are conservatives ignoring their business dealings? Especially the $2 billion investment into Jared's new private equity fund, after it was found to be "unsatisfactory in all aspects"? www.pbs.org/newshour/show/massive-saudi-investment-raises-questions-about-jared-kushners-business-dealingsThe point wasn’t about hunters business dealings or whether he did anything illegal. However he was sucking up money from china and Ukraine. Most of that is very questionable. He is a known drug addict who may have had access to the classified docs that were in biden’s unsecured garage. That was the point. That’s enough, isn’t it? We are all still waiting for info on the laptop and what’s going to happen with that but that wasn’t mentioned except by you. The difference between Trump and biden document handling is that the biden documents were kept quiet when they were discovered 6 days before the midterms. For two whole months. That should be considered interference. There is no other way to spin that! I’m going to assume that if Kushner did something wrong, we would all have known about it by now. The left is pretty good about going after that stuff. I’m going to guess that it will end up like the whole Russian collusion story. Not true.
|
|
|
Post by femalebusiness on Jan 17, 2023 22:44:25 GMT
Please stop engaging with the ignorant troll. Like all Magas it will never change its mind or admit they are wrong. The troll never engages anywhere else so stop feeding it Ignore. Ignore. Ignore the ignorant. They will go find others to play with if they don't get a reaction. I am not talking about legitimate conservatives who have a point to make.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 28, 2024 20:09:15 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2023 22:47:15 GMT
Please stop engaging with the ignorant troll. Like all Magas it will never change its mind or admit they are wrong. The troll never engages anywhere else so stop feeding it Ignore. Ignore. Ignore the ignorant. They will go find others to play with if they don't get a reaction. I am not talking about legitimate conservatives who have a point to make. What legitimate conservatives? There are some here? The only ones I ever see are the magas.
|
|
|
Post by cindosha on Jan 17, 2023 22:49:05 GMT
Please stop engaging with the ignorant troll. Like all Magas it will never change its mind or admit they are wrong. The troll never engages anywhere else so stop feeding it Ignore. Ignore. Ignore the ignorant. They will go find others to play with if they don't get a reaction. I am not talking about legitimate conservatives who have a point to make. And yet here you are. Commenting again. Just because you don’t like the point doesn’t mean it’s not a valid point.
|
|
|
Post by femalebusiness on Jan 17, 2023 22:50:34 GMT
Ignore. Ignore. Ignore the ignorant. They will go find others to play with if they don't get a reaction. I am not talking about legitimate conservatives who have a point to make. And yet here you are. Commenting again. Just because you don’t like the point doesn’t mean it’s not a valid point. Still sucking that orange dick I see.
|
|
|
Post by cindosha on Jan 17, 2023 22:52:53 GMT
Ignore. Ignore. Ignore the ignorant. They will go find others to play with if they don't get a reaction. I am not talking about legitimate conservatives who have a point to make. What legitimate conservatives? There are some here? The only ones I ever see are the magas. Awwww. You really hurt our feelings.
|
|
|
Post by cindosha on Jan 17, 2023 22:54:43 GMT
And yet here you are. Commenting again. Just because you don’t like the point doesn’t mean it’s not a valid point. Still sucking that orange dick I see. Stuff like that is what people say when they don’t have a good argument.
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Jan 18, 2023 0:00:49 GMT
Ignore. Ignore. Ignore the ignorant. They will go find others to play with if they don't get a reaction. I am not talking about legitimate conservatives who have a point to make. What legitimate conservatives? There are some here? The only ones I ever see are the magas. I’m curious, is anyone forcing either of you to read her posts? If not, what’s it to you if she posts on this board? I’m having a hard time understanding why you think it’s acceptable for either of you or anyone else on this board for that matter to come on a thread and tell people not to engage with a person you have a problem with. I could almost understand it if this person’s post were downright nasty, but even then wouldn’t that be up to the administrator to handle? I would think the best solution would to be to just ignore that person’s posts instead of coming across as busybodies. Now I’m sounding like a busybody but I honestly don’t see how it’s acceptable for some people to decide who one shouldn’t engage with on an open board.
|
|
|
Post by morecowbell on Jan 21, 2023 20:51:28 GMT
I find it unbelievable that you, along with others, think that it would be okay to destroy classified documents simply because no one knew about them being missing. The NARA wouldn’t have known about the Trump docs either if someone hadn’t notified them. I’m pretty sure there’s no statue of limitations on how long you can have classified documents before it’s no big deal. Whether they were taken willfully or ‘inadvertently’ as Biden claims is irrelevant. Classified documents belong to the government and neither should have had them in there possession after leaving office. So you claim to have no real knowledge of Hunter Biden, does that mean you intentionally choose to be uninformed as cindosha was accused of being regarding Santos. That laptop and emails have been verified by The New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, NBC, CBS, MSNBC and a few others. Apparently you don’t grasp what a moral compass means. Or maybe you didn’t read the post where moral compass was brought into the conversation. Maybe if you had you would understand how your rantings above looks a little silly. But here let me fill you in. A couple of posts back I said basically the Biden People did the right thing notifying the NARA when they first discovered the classified documents. They didn’t have to but they did do the right thing. I also said on another thread/post that thanks to trump’s reaction when he was asked to return the documents that the NARA should be the one to pack up files when an individual, who had access to classified documents, leaves office. I believe that was the post that included an ABC News article that gave a rundown of the Presidential Records Act. As far as Hunter Biden’s laptop goes there is a thing called “chain of custody” which is proving that Hunter Biden had care, custody & control of that laptop when all the data was entered. Good luck with that. He is/was a drug addict so who knows had access to that laptop. Which means its questionable how much of the information on that laptop would stand up in court. That is probably why they have only charged him with tax fraud & not completing some application correctly. And wasn’t there one guy who made claims about information on the laptop and he has since been deemed as not creditable? What I’m trying to figure out is why I should know all about Hunter Biden’s personal life? I know about the laptop and he is/was a drug addict. So why should I know or care about all aspects of his personal life? IMO those fixated on his personal life are busybodies. And no I don’t know anything about Santos’s personal life either. What I do know he is a lying newly elected member of the House who is/will be under investigation by a foreign country along with investigations in his home state of New York. Are you speaking of Tony Bobulinski, Hunter's business partner, or someone else?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 28, 2024 20:09:15 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 21, 2023 22:16:43 GMT
What exactly did Hunter Biden do that was illegal? Aside from possible tax evasion and a false statement about a gun purchase. What did the laptop reveal? The chain of custody of the laptop is sketchy and almost all of the media that looked at it acknowledged someone could have tampered with the laptop. Hunter Biden is not a government employee. How are the laptop or emails relevant to President Biden? Just a reminder, Hunter is already being investigated by a Trump appointee in the department of Justice. If he did something illegal, he should be treated the same as any other American. Republicans can't have it both ways. If you're criticizing Biden for his handling of classified documents, where is your criticism of Trump? If Hunter is guilty of tax evasion, where is your criticism of Trump whose company has now been found guilty of tax fraud? Neither situation is really a fair comparison, but it seems hypocritical and disingenuous for conservatives to criticize the Bidens when they refuse to criticize Trump for much bigger and more significant infractions. Furthermore, if you're questioning Hunter Biden's business dealings, where are your questions about Jared and Ivanka's business deals? Both of them actually worked for the White House. Why are conservatives ignoring their business dealings? Especially the $2 billion investment into Jared's new private equity fund, after it was found to be "unsatisfactory in all aspects"? www.pbs.org/newshour/show/massive-saudi-investment-raises-questions-about-jared-kushners-business-dealingsThe point wasn’t about hunters business dealings or whether he did anything illegal. However he was sucking up money from china and Ukraine. Most of that is very questionable. He is a known drug addict who may have had access to the classified docs that were in biden’s unsecured garage. That was the point. That’s enough, isn’t it? We are all still waiting for info on the laptop and what’s going to happen with that but that wasn’t mentioned except by you. The difference between Trump and biden document handling is that the biden documents were kept quiet when they were discovered 6 days before the midterms. For two whole months. That should be considered interference. There is no other way to spin that! I’m going to assume that if Kushner did something wrong, we would all have known about it by now. The left is pretty good about going after that stuff. I’m going to guess that it will end up like the whole Russian collusion story. Not true. You mean like Don Jr (cokehead) having access to Mar-a-Lago?
|
|
|
Post by Scrapper100 on Jan 22, 2023 0:33:40 GMT
Wasn’t the reason for the FBI actually going to Mar because of reports of who was there and going in and out if the room they were stored in or who was visiting Mar itself - Saudis? I could be wrong but I thought I read that somewhere.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Jan 22, 2023 2:14:59 GMT
What can the house do?
How about their jobs that we are paying them to do!
Like govern!
|
|
|
Post by cindosha on Jan 22, 2023 3:56:23 GMT
The point wasn’t about hunters business dealings or whether he did anything illegal. However he was sucking up money from china and Ukraine. Most of that is very questionable. He is a known drug addict who may have had access to the classified docs that were in biden’s unsecured garage. That was the point. That’s enough, isn’t it? We are all still waiting for info on the laptop and what’s going to happen with that but that wasn’t mentioned except by you. The difference between Trump and biden document handling is that the biden documents were kept quiet when they were discovered 6 days before the midterms. For two whole months. That should be considered interference. There is no other way to spin that! I’m going to assume that if Kushner did something wrong, we would all have known about it by now. The left is pretty good about going after that stuff. I’m going to guess that it will end up like the whole Russian collusion story. Not true. You mean like Don Jr (cokehead) having access to Mar-a-Lago? You spelled hunter (crack/meth) and dad’s garage wrong. He’s the only one there is concrete proof about BTW. Sounds like you are trying to deflect from the fact that the fjb docs were found 6 days before the midterms and kept quiet until almost mid January. You’re doing a good job at that.
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Jan 22, 2023 4:23:16 GMT
You mean like Don Jr (cokehead) having access to Mar-a-Lago? You spelled hunter (crack/meth) and dad’s garage wrong. He’s the only one there is concrete proof about BTW. Sounds like you are trying to deflect from the fact that the fjb docs were found 6 days before the midterms and kept quiet until almost mid January. You’re doing a good job at that. So why are you so fixated on the fact nothing was said about these documents until January? So what?
|
|
|
Post by cindosha on Jan 22, 2023 4:57:24 GMT
You spelled hunter (crack/meth) and dad’s garage wrong. He’s the only one there is concrete proof about BTW. Sounds like you are trying to deflect from the fact that the fjb docs were found 6 days before the midterms and kept quiet until almost mid January. You’re doing a good job at that. So why are you so fixated on the fact nothing was said about these documents until January? So what? IMO it was kept quiet because of the mid terms. I consider that interference. Why are you not more concerned about this. Do you really think it was ok to hide this??? Let alone the fact that they were in an unsecured garage just for starters.
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Jan 22, 2023 6:16:38 GMT
So why are you so fixated on the fact nothing was said about these documents until January? So what? IMO it was kept quiet because of the mid terms. I consider that interference. Why are you not more concerned about this. Do you really think it was ok to hide this??? Let alone the fact that they were in an unsecured garage just for starters. Interference how? President Biden wasn’t running for re-election. If you were to break into a locked garage what would you steal? A vintage corvette or a box or boxes of papers that one has no idea what type of papers were in the box or boxes? On the misc thread I posted a NPR article that gives a history of the Presidential Papers Act. From that article… “Violations of the Presidential Records Act are seldom pursued and even more rarely prosecuted, making for little precedent in these matters. Prior to the appointment of a special counsel for Trump's probe, legal experts told ABC News they were skeptical that the DOJ would take the unusual step of seeking criminal charges against a former president for violating the Presidential Records Act.
Trump, who is running for president for a third time, has dismissed the DOJ's investigation as "political" and defended himself as "innocent." The Biden White House has said an investigation will show the classified materials were "inadvertently misplaced, and the president and his lawyers acted promptly upon discovery of this mistake."
Apparently this is happened before and it was “seldom pursued and even more rarely prosecuted “. If dumpster don had acted as an adult and actually returned all the documents when the NARA asked for them back in May 2021 there is a real possibility, if the article is correct, nothing more would have come of it. And chances are we never would have heard about it unless trump did his I’m a victim whine. And when President Biden’s people found the documents and contacted the NARA like responsible adults we might never have heard about it either. And that’s fine with me. And in my opinion President Biden is collateral damage from trump acting like a child. And also in my opinion to keep classified papers either deliberately or by accident leaving the premises when someone leaves office the NARA should have people there making sure no classified documents are packed by mistake. Those on the right keep looking for things the left does they can use to compare to the actions taken by trump & other Republicans so they can say “ see they do it too”. Problem is, while the Democrats have done some dumb things it would be like comparing apples to pineapples. Both are “apples” but in reality not a true comparison since neither are truly alike.
|
|
|
Post by cindosha on Jan 22, 2023 14:13:28 GMT
IMO it was kept quiet because of the mid terms. I consider that interference. Why are you not more concerned about this. Do you really think it was ok to hide this??? Let alone the fact that they were in an unsecured garage just for starters. Interference how? President Biden wasn’t running for re-election. If you were to break into a locked garage what would you steal? A vintage corvette or a box or boxes of papers that one has no idea what type of papers were in the box or boxes? On the misc thread I posted a NPR article that gives a history of the Presidential Papers Act. From that article… “Violations of the Presidential Records Act are seldom pursued and even more rarely prosecuted, making for little precedent in these matters. Prior to the appointment of a special counsel for Trump's probe, legal experts told ABC News they were skeptical that the DOJ would take the unusual step of seeking criminal charges against a former president for violating the Presidential Records Act.
Trump, who is running for president for a third time, has dismissed the DOJ's investigation as "political" and defended himself as "innocent." The Biden White House has said an investigation will show the classified materials were "inadvertently misplaced, and the president and his lawyers acted promptly upon discovery of this mistake."
Apparently this is happened before and it was “seldom pursued and even more rarely prosecuted “. If dumpster don had acted as an adult and actually returned all the documents when the NARA asked for them back in May 2021 there is a real possibility, if the article is correct, nothing more would have come of it. And chances are we never would have heard about it unless trump did his I’m a victim whine. And when President Biden’s people found the documents and contacted the NARA like responsible adults we might never have heard about it either. And that’s fine with me. And in my opinion President Biden is collateral damage from trump acting like a child. And also in my opinion to keep classified papers either deliberately or by accident leaving the premises when someone leaves office the NARA should have people there making sure no classified documents are packed by mistake. Those on the right keep looking for things the left does they can use to compare to the actions taken by trump & other Republicans so they can say “ see they do it too”. Problem is, while the Democrats have done some dumb things it would be like comparing apples to pineapples. Both are “apples” but in reality not a true comparison since neither are truly alike. It makes no difference whether biden was running or not. It was an important election and the documents were intentionally withheld. IMO they withheld them trying to find a way to not have them exposed and that perhaps would have changed voters choices. Keeping the news of discovering them from the public for two months pretty much cements that theory. IMO biden also kept them hidden so that they would not have to concede that they are no different than Trump regarding the docs. I’m pretty sure that even if Trump would’ve given up the documents right away he would’ve been pursued anyway. The left would have made sure of that because they were still screaming about it until Biden’s docs were finally brought to light. And the article is one persons opinion. And you know as well as I do that there is no “apples to pineapples”. It’s all a bunch of crooked, amoral, unethical elected officials trying to get rich off of the American public and to see how much power they can wield and what disaster they can produce to control and coerce us. Nothing more, nothing less!
|
|
|
Post by sunshine on Jan 22, 2023 14:19:56 GMT
Where'd they find this latest batch of documents, in a magazine rack next to the toilet?
Good gravy.
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Jan 22, 2023 15:52:52 GMT
Interference how? President Biden wasn’t running for re-election. If you were to break into a locked garage what would you steal? A vintage corvette or a box or boxes of papers that one has no idea what type of papers were in the box or boxes? On the misc thread I posted a NPR article that gives a history of the Presidential Papers Act. From that article… “Violations of the Presidential Records Act are seldom pursued and even more rarely prosecuted, making for little precedent in these matters. Prior to the appointment of a special counsel for Trump's probe, legal experts told ABC News they were skeptical that the DOJ would take the unusual step of seeking criminal charges against a former president for violating the Presidential Records Act.
Trump, who is running for president for a third time, has dismissed the DOJ's investigation as "political" and defended himself as "innocent." The Biden White House has said an investigation will show the classified materials were "inadvertently misplaced, and the president and his lawyers acted promptly upon discovery of this mistake."
Apparently this is happened before and it was “seldom pursued and even more rarely prosecuted “. If dumpster don had acted as an adult and actually returned all the documents when the NARA asked for them back in May 2021 there is a real possibility, if the article is correct, nothing more would have come of it. And chances are we never would have heard about it unless trump did his I’m a victim whine. And when President Biden’s people found the documents and contacted the NARA like responsible adults we might never have heard about it either. And that’s fine with me. And in my opinion President Biden is collateral damage from trump acting like a child. And also in my opinion to keep classified papers either deliberately or by accident leaving the premises when someone leaves office the NARA should have people there making sure no classified documents are packed by mistake. Those on the right keep looking for things the left does they can use to compare to the actions taken by trump & other Republicans so they can say “ see they do it too”. Problem is, while the Democrats have done some dumb things it would be like comparing apples to pineapples. Both are “apples” but in reality not a true comparison since neither are truly alike. It makes no difference whether biden was running or not. It was an important election and the documents were intentionally withheld. IMO they withheld them trying to find a way to not have them exposed and that perhaps would have changed voters choices. Keeping the news of discovering them from the public for two months pretty much cements that theory. IMO biden also kept them hidden so that they would not have to concede that they are no different than Trump regarding the docs. I’m pretty sure that even if Trump would’ve given up the documents right away he would’ve been pursued anyway. The left would have made sure of that because they were still screaming about it until Biden’s docs were finally brought to light. And the article is one persons opinion. And you know as well as I do that there is no “apples to pineapples”. It’s all a bunch of crooked, amoral, unethical elected officials trying to get rich off of the American public and to see how much power they can wield and what disaster they can produce to control and coerce us. Nothing more, nothing less! Interesting that you call all politicians crooks, but I don’t recall you criticizing Trump over his mishandling of documents. Or calling out Santos for his blatant lies or McCarthy for refusing to ask him to resign. Your criticism of politicians is generally very one sided. I'm not certain if the article is from ABC or NPR, but it's a fact that violations of the presidential records act are rarely prosecuted, not an opinion. The act was passed in 1978, after Nixon. There is no precedent of criminal investigations into a former president for the presidential records act. The only precedent is senior officials improperly retaining documents including General Petraeus who illegally retained documents and shared them as well as Sandy Berger and Harold Martin. The records act alone does not contain criminal provisions, it's up to the justice department. Furthermore, if criminal cases are pursued there needs to be intent. Trump already admitted to intent, he claimed the documents were his. In Biden's case, intent would be much more difficult to prove, it appears to be an oversight. abcnews.go.com/Politics/explainer-doj-probes-draw-attention-presidential-records-act/story?id=96417220Violations of the Presidential Records Act are seldom pursued and even more rarely prosecuted, making for little precedent in these matters.abcnews.go.com/US/past-cases-reveal-trumps-legal-exposure-fbi-raid/story?id=88190464
|
|
|
Post by crazy4scraps on Jan 22, 2023 16:06:37 GMT
Where'd they find this latest batch of documents, in a magazine rack next to the toilet?
Good gravy.
I guess that would be a step up from finding them ripped up, IN the toilet.
|
|
|
Post by sunshine on Jan 22, 2023 17:03:15 GMT
Where'd they find this latest batch of documents, in a magazine rack next to the toilet?
Good gravy.
I guess that would be a step up from finding them ripped up, IN the toilet. Forgot about that story. Where did that story come from again?
|
|
|
Post by crazy4scraps on Jan 22, 2023 17:11:42 GMT
I guess that would be a step up from finding them ripped up, IN the toilet. Forgot about that story. Where did that story come from again? Google it, there are literally dozens of places that reported on it.
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Jan 22, 2023 18:12:39 GMT
Interesting that TFG was notified by NARA and/or DOJ that he had possession of missi g documents in at least January 2022. There was communication. NARA/DOJ went to MAL in June 2022. At no time was it announced about the ongoing requests.
The only reason the public knew anything, TFG announced the 'raid', which was conducted with a judge issued Warrant for search and seizure in August 2022.
His lawyers repeatedly advised that all documents were turned over. They had already searched MAL on their own without any government representatives until Aug 2022.
Too bad TFG never volunteered for a full search. Why? He knew he had something to hide!!!!
|
|
|
Post by cindosha on Jan 22, 2023 21:58:18 GMT
Where'd they find this latest batch of documents, in a magazine rack next to the toilet?
Good gravy.
Are you referring to the new ones found in his unsecured house yesterday? Lord knows how many more there are and where else they will find them. Hopefully this is the end of them. Why are you all ignoring the fact that these docs were found 6 days before the midterms and no one knew about them until the beginning of January? If this had been something Trump did, withholding them before an election, the SWHTF
|
|
|
Post by cindosha on Jan 22, 2023 22:02:07 GMT
Interesting that TFG was notified by NARA and/or DOJ that he had possession of missi g documents in at least January 2022. There was communication. NARA/DOJ went to MAL in June 2022. At no time was it announced about the ongoing requests. The only reason the public knew anything, TFG announced the 'raid', which was conducted with a judge issued Warrant for search and seizure in August 2022. His lawyers repeatedly advised that all documents were turned over. They had already searched MAL on their own without any government representatives until Aug 2022. Too bad TFG never volunteered for a full search. Why? He knew he had something to hide!!!! If Trump had anything to hide we would have all known it by now.
|
|
|
Post by Gem Girl on Jan 22, 2023 22:11:53 GMT
Interesting that TFG was notified by NARA and/or DOJ that he had possession of missi g documents in at least January 2022. There was communication. NARA/DOJ went to MAL in June 2022. At no time was it announced about the ongoing requests. The only reason the public knew anything, TFG announced the 'raid', which was conducted with a judge issued Warrant for search and seizure in August 2022. His lawyers repeatedly advised that all documents were turned over. They had already searched MAL on their own without any government representatives until Aug 2022. Too bad TFG never volunteered for a full search. Why? He knew he had something to hide!!!! If Trump had anything to hide we would have all known it by now.
|
|
|
Post by sunshine on Jan 22, 2023 22:18:08 GMT
Forgot about that story. Where did that story come from again? Google it, there are literally dozens of places that reported on it. Ah yes. The story came from Maggie Haberman's book that said it appeared trump flushed paper that apparently had been written by him because it looked like a Sharpie was used. Proof positive.
Oh well, nothing would surprise me any more, including when they keep finding documents that The Big Guy stashed here, there and everywhere.
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Jan 22, 2023 22:22:32 GMT
Google it, there are literally dozens of places that reported on it. Ah yes. The story came from Maggie Haberman's book that said it appeared trump flushed paper that apparently had been written by him because it looked like a Sharpie was used. Proof positive.
Oh well, nothing would surprise me any more, including when they keep finding documents that The Big Guy stashed here, there and everywhere.
There are photos of paper with Trump's handwriting. More than just apparently and looked like. www.axios.com/2022/08/08/trump-toilet-photos-maggie-haberman
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Jan 22, 2023 22:23:49 GMT
Where'd they find this latest batch of documents, in a magazine rack next to the toilet?
Good gravy.
Are you referring to the new ones found in his unsecured house yesterday? Lord knows how many more there are and where else they will find them. Hopefully this is the end of them. Why are you all ignoring the fact that these docs were found 6 days before the midterms and no one knew about them until the beginning of January? If this had been something Trump did, withholding them before an election, the SWHTF You really are hung up on the fact the information about these documents were not released until January. That somehow by withholding this information it did something to the midterms. But you are short on specifics. President Biden was not on the ballot. You certainly aren’t going to claim that if the information had been released prior to the midterms that it would have changed the outcome are you? That because presidential documents were found by the the Biden people and immediately turned over to the NARA the voters would “punish” the Democrats by voting for the other guy? Even though none of the Democrats on the ballot had anything to do with the Biden documents? Because if you are suggesting that would have happened then you will go a long way in proving what I have been saying about voters and the choices they make.
|
|