|
Post by sasha on Oct 29, 2020 22:04:30 GMT
That's awesome for your friend. And yes, I know it happens. See my comment above for some context on my feelings about this. I saw it after I posted. It was just anecdotal anyway. I don't have strong opinions about Hunter Biden or remarrying widows/widowers. I hear your feelings about both. (And I'm sorry for your and your daughter's loss.) You are so kind J u l e e! Yeah, I really didn't mean to condemn everyone that has found solace in family member/friends and then subsequently married them. In this context, I find Hunter and his track history with women creepy AF! And again, sorry for derailing this thread!
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Oct 29, 2020 22:10:30 GMT
I realize you feel strongly about this, but I have to take issue with being “old enough to know better.” I know or know of two women who married their late husband’s brother of best friend. There are also other examples of it that I have read or heard of, so this type of relationship is neither rare nor taboo - and I can understand why. We also have absolutely no idea how people within the Biden family felt about it, including the children. (Just informationally, for those curious, they started dating more than a year after the death.) Not your choice? Fine. But on behalf of the people I know who made a different choice, I’m struggling with several claims things you have said about such a relationship. Not my choice, no. My dead husband has a very good looking, single best friend I could have dated three years after his death. I didn't. My daughter had very strong views on this after picking up what she thought was flirtation on his part. She said he's like an Uncle to her and would have been very hurt and it would've felt like a betrayal of her dad. She was very supportive of me dating my boyfriend. I wouldn't have dated my late husband's best friend. It would've felt very strange to me. There's plenty of fish in the sea, so I didn't feel the need to dip into the family/family friend pool. So my view is clouded not only by that, but also b/c the man in question is a womanizer; a man who spent money on prostitutes during his marriage, procreated with a stripper than denied it was his child and was taken to court over not paying child support. If it worked out for the two women and their families support this, then good for them. I would imagine that their families probably did go through some "this is weird" views at some point though. I'm also betting that the men in question don't have the history that Hunter does. I wouldn't walk up to your friends and say, "Hey, fucking your dead husband's brother or best friend is shitty!" And if this were real life and a friend of mind did the same thing I'd probably be like hey, life is short, glad you're happy. I would not offer up my negative thoughts on it. But we're on a message board and I offered up my opinion on Hunter's womanizing. I also feel like if this were Don Jr., the reactions to my comments would be different. You know Don Jr. is/has done pretty much the same thing, right? He’s a cheater, womanizer, adulterer. You’re entitled to your opinions. It’s not disgusting or trashy as you seem to think. Many older/elderly do exactly this—hook up after their spouses die. It’s not new. Most humans crave companionship. Getting together with a deceased friends spouse is a normal reaction, through grief, love, and loneliness.
|
|
|
Post by sasha on Oct 29, 2020 22:13:22 GMT
I had a friend when I was younger whose mom died. Her father married her mom's sister maybe two years later. The kids were all middle school age, and my friend LOVED this. She loved having her aunt in her home. She missed her mom so much. I think it probably helped her to have someone she loved, who also loved her and who made her dad happy, in her life. I also know a friend of a friend who lost her husband. She married his best friend about a year later. I think it's only weird if we make it weird. And I also think it probably happens more than we'd think. I don't have an issue with the dating his brother's wife. My parents had some really good friends that did everything together. One year, the wife of one couple died suddenly. A couple years later, the husband of the other couple died. The two widows dated and got married less than a year later. Their kids were not surprised. The remaining husband died recently and the widow is just lost. As I said in my response to J u l e e, I really didn't mean to condemn all couples that find solace in one another after grief.
|
|
inkedup
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,837
Jun 26, 2014 5:00:26 GMT
|
Post by inkedup on Oct 29, 2020 22:23:17 GMT
I understand where you’re coming from. I think I just look at him and see this really damaged person, and it tugs at my heart a bit. I shouldn't have said POS. What happened to him and his family was truly tragic. And for someone like myself who has had to put the pieces back together for my kid who lost her dad at 14 going on 15, I should STFU calling someone that. No one should have to go through what he did. I'm so saddened to hear of your loss, sasha. My heart goes our to you and your daughter.
|
|
|
Post by sasha on Oct 29, 2020 22:25:25 GMT
Not my choice, no. My dead husband has a very good looking, single best friend I could have dated three years after his death. I didn't. My daughter had very strong views on this after picking up what she thought was flirtation on his part. She said he's like an Uncle to her and would have been very hurt and it would've felt like a betrayal of her dad. She was very supportive of me dating my boyfriend. I wouldn't have dated my late husband's best friend. It would've felt very strange to me. There's plenty of fish in the sea, so I didn't feel the need to dip into the family/family friend pool. So my view is clouded not only by that, but also b/c the man in question is a womanizer; a man who spent money on prostitutes during his marriage, procreated with a stripper than denied it was his child and was taken to court over not paying child support. If it worked out for the two women and their families support this, then good for them. I would imagine that their families probably did go through some "this is weird" views at some point though. I'm also betting that the men in question don't have the history that Hunter does. I wouldn't walk up to your friends and say, "Hey, fucking your dead husband's brother or best friend is shitty!" And if this were real life and a friend of mind did the same thing I'd probably be like hey, life is short, glad you're happy. I would not offer up my negative thoughts on it. But we're on a message board and I offered up my opinion on Hunter's womanizing. I also feel like if this were Don Jr., the reactions to my comments would be different. You know Don Jr. is/has done pretty much the same thing, right? He’s a cheater, womanizer, adulterer. You’re entitled to your opinions. It’s not disgusting or trashy as you seem to think. Many older/elderly do exactly this—hook up after their spouses die. It’s not new. Most humans crave companionship. Getting together with a deceased friends spouse is a normal reaction, through grief, love, and loneliness. Yes, that's why I mentioned Don Jr. He's all of those things that Hunter Biden is. I hate him and all of Trump's dangerous, dumb, gross children. But I think if it was Don Jr.'s brother hooking up with his dead brother's wife people here would pass judgment on him. Let me put it this way: Hunter Biden is trashy. It's not because of him entering into a relationship with his dead brother's wife. It's his history of being a cheater, buying prostitutes while in a marriage, impregnating strippers and then marrying a woman after a 10 day relationship (also impregnated) that makes me view his hooking up with his dead brother's wife much, much different than elderly good humans, with a very small dating pool to chose from, that find each other after grief.
|
|
|
Post by sasha on Oct 29, 2020 22:26:18 GMT
I shouldn't have said POS. What happened to him and his family was truly tragic. And for someone like myself who has had to put the pieces back together for my kid who lost her dad at 14 going on 15, I should STFU calling someone that. No one should have to go through what he did. I'm so saddened to hear of your loss, sasha . My heart goes our to you and your daughter. Thanks so much for your kind words!
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Oct 29, 2020 22:30:59 GMT
I think comparing hunter Biden and the trump kids is comparing apples and oranges. Is Hunter perfect? No. But he has not done even 1/4 of the things that the Trump kids have done DURING this presidency. And like someone above said, he is not going to be part of the administration the way the Trump kids have been.
|
|
|
Post by sasha on Oct 29, 2020 22:38:37 GMT
I think comparing hunter Biden and the trump kids is comparing apples and oranges. Is Hunter perfect? No. But he has not done even 1/4 of the things that the Trump kids have done DURING this presidency. And like someone above said, he is not going to be part of the administration the way the Trump kids have been. Yes, I know he won't be a part of the administration thank GOD. Hoping this dangerous precedent by the idiot in charge ends with his presidency. Anyway: Sorry for offending those who know people widowed that have married within the family or married best friends. I did not mean to condemn it for everyone esp. the elderly whose dating pool is very limited.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 11:53:14 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2020 23:42:29 GMT
Slimy F#$*(#*$s How a fake persona laid the groundwork for a Hunter Biden conspiracy deluge A 64-page document that was later disseminated by close associates of President Donald Trump appears to be the work of a fake "intelligence firm." One month before a purported leak of files from Hunter Biden's laptop, a fake "intelligence" document about him went viral on the right-wing internet, asserting an elaborate conspiracy theory involving former Vice President Joe Biden's son and business in China. The document, a 64-page composition that was later disseminated by close associates of President Donald Trump, appears to be the work of a fake "intelligence firm" called Typhoon Investigations, according to researchers and public documents. The author of the document, a self-identified Swiss security analyst named Martin Aspen, is a fabricated identity, according to analysis by disinformation researchers, who also concluded that Aspen's profile picture was created with an artificial intelligence face generator. The intelligence firm that Aspen lists as his previous employer said that no one by that name had ever worked for the company and that no one by that name lives in Switzerland, according to public records and social media searches. www.nbcnews.com/tech/security/how-fake-persona-laid-groundwork-hunter-biden-conspiracy-deluge-n1245387
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 11:53:14 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2020 23:44:26 GMT
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 30, 2020 3:29:28 GMT
I’m in a political discussion group on Facebook for recovering Republicans. A guy in the group posted this, and I thought it pretty much covered all the bases. I am reposting with his permission. Post by Denny Coverstone: May I begin by stating that computer repair shops are no place to have an Apple product repaired. Apple products are repaired by Apple so that exclusive proprietary construction and programming are kept intact. Apple doesn't share repair instructions with computer repair shops. So just so I have the latest email scandal straight: Hunter Biden, who lives in Los Angeles, decides to fly 3000 miles across country to drop off 3 MacBook Pros at a computer repair shop run by a blind guy who charges the insanely low price of $85 for data recovery. Hunter gets off the plane and drunk-drives to the repair shop in Wilmington desperate for service, because everyone knows there are no computer repair shops anywhere in LA. He staggers into the shop reeking of booze, drops them off, signs a contract for repair and then totally disappears, because he's so close to his easily-reachable dad that his dad is responsible for Hunter, but so not-close that his dad is unable to relay a message to Hunter that his computers are ready for pickup. The repair shop owner recovers the data but instead of doing what data recovery people normally do when computers are abandoned, which is wipe the data clean and sell the hardware, he reads literally thousands of Hunter's *private* emails (half of which are probably the "Reply All" chains we hate) but a few of those thousands of emails may mention a possible meeting arrangement between his dad and a Ukrainian guy. (For what? it's not mentioned.) Repair Shop Guy is so alarmed that he contacts the FBI. The FBI arranges to pick up the hard drives, but Repair Shop Guy chooses to take the completely normal step of copying those drives. Once he realizes the FBI isn't doing anything with them (hmmm... wonder why), he calls up the most credible ex-Mayor on Earth and hands him their contents. That totally credible ex-Mayor is also so alarmed by these emails that instead of immediately going public or talking to Barr's DOJ, he sits on them for months and then chooses to release them 3 weeks before the election. The responsible media then asks to independently verify their validity through a forensic analysis of the emails' metadata, but said ex-Mayor does what people do when trying to prove contrivances as facts and lies as truth ... refuses fact-based independent unbiased evaluation. May I begin by stating that computer repair shops are no place to have an Apple product repaired. Apple products are repaired by Apple so that exclusive proprietary construction and programming are kept intact. Apple doesn't share repair instructions with computer repair shops. That in particular has been shown otherwise right here in this thread. Is this the same information that was printed and mailed overnight to Tucker Carlson which was then lost in transit with no copies made? No one ever said there weren't any copies or actual sources for copies. The media and previously proven lying out their ass politicians have claimed it's nothing but Russian disinformation. Director of Intelligence John Ratcliffe has debunked that. I also don't think anyone denied other media outlets access to verify any of this, I'm not sure where that's coming from. Much of the scenario painted in this whole thread is just flat out incorrect. Just flippant statements thrown out with nothing based on reality. You can dismiss the Hunter devices with all the excuses you want , but there are now other devices from other people that corroborate the emails in the Hunter devices. There is an eyewitness to the meetings WITH Joe. Not an "I was in the office/restaurant/park/wherever and overheard them", but "I'm their business partner and was IN those meetings WITH JOE in attendance." type of eyewitness. He's rich, so doesn't need money, he's a Democrat, so not a smear campaign. There are RECENT audio recordings of their partners lamenting about being "buried" if this gets out as they were being warned about it. At the very least you now can no longer deny that Joe has lied when he has continually said, "I have never discussed my son's business dealings with him." Don't forget, in 2015, Obama administration officials were questioning this Hunter/Burisma/VP Joe thing back then.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 11:53:14 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 30, 2020 3:43:45 GMT
It's so fun to watch their f#($8ups
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 30, 2020 7:29:02 GMT
Tucker Carlson slowly backs away from it all. No, he isn't. He did say that Hunter is a man that "lost control of his demons and that pounding on a man and piling on him when he's already down is something that we don't want to be involved in." But he's very much not backing down from Joe Biden's corruption and will continue to report on it.
|
|
|
Post by sunshine on Oct 30, 2020 10:52:29 GMT
It's so fun to watch their f#($8ups Do you ever form your own thoughts, or is all of your thinking done for you by Twitter? It's obvious you didn't watch and listen to Carlson, because if you had you'd know Carlson never said he was backing away from the story. Backing away from personal attacks on Hunter, yes.
Then, there's the spread of the falsehood that Fox News sent the original documents/flash drive. Not a single article I read trying to find that information quoted anyone confirming that. Another falsehood that was made up, and repeated over and over. Anyone that watched Carlson's show knows he never said the original was sent.
Talk about Russian disinformation, lol.
|
|
|
Post by hop2 on Oct 30, 2020 10:58:54 GMT
Slimy F#$*(#*$s How a fake persona laid the groundwork for a Hunter Biden conspiracy deluge A 64-page document that was later disseminated by close associates of President Donald Trump appears to be the work of a fake "intelligence firm." One month before a purported leak of files from Hunter Biden's laptop, a fake "intelligence" document about him went viral on the right-wing internet, asserting an elaborate conspiracy theory involving former Vice President Joe Biden's son and business in China. The document, a 64-page composition that was later disseminated by close associates of President Donald Trump, appears to be the work of a fake "intelligence firm" called Typhoon Investigations, according to researchers and public documents. The author of the document, a self-identified Swiss security analyst named Martin Aspen, is a fabricated identity, according to analysis by disinformation researchers, who also concluded that Aspen's profile picture was created with an artificial intelligence face generator. The intelligence firm that Aspen lists as his previous employer said that no one by that name had ever worked for the company and that no one by that name lives in Switzerland, according to public records and social media searches. www.nbcnews.com/tech/security/how-fake-persona-laid-groundwork-hunter-biden-conspiracy-deluge-n1245387Is that like Martin Odum? Lmao
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 11:53:14 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 30, 2020 13:00:55 GMT
Slimy F#$*(#*$s How a fake persona laid the groundwork for a Hunter Biden conspiracy deluge A 64-page document that was later disseminated by close associates of President Donald Trump appears to be the work of a fake "intelligence firm." One month before a purported leak of files from Hunter Biden's laptop, a fake "intelligence" document about him went viral on the right-wing internet, asserting an elaborate conspiracy theory involving former Vice President Joe Biden's son and business in China. The document, a 64-page composition that was later disseminated by close associates of President Donald Trump, appears to be the work of a fake "intelligence firm" called Typhoon Investigations, according to researchers and public documents. The author of the document, a self-identified Swiss security analyst named Martin Aspen, is a fabricated identity, according to analysis by disinformation researchers, who also concluded that Aspen's profile picture was created with an artificial intelligence face generator. The intelligence firm that Aspen lists as his previous employer said that no one by that name had ever worked for the company and that no one by that name lives in Switzerland, according to public records and social media searches. www.nbcnews.com/tech/security/how-fake-persona-laid-groundwork-hunter-biden-conspiracy-deluge-n1245387Is that like Martin Odum? Lmao They're so ridiculous it's almost funny. If it weren't so pathetic.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 11:53:14 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 30, 2020 13:12:42 GMT
A nice little comparison of Hunter Biden vs. Donny Jr. and Vanky "It is true that on basic anti-nepotism grounds, Joe Biden is far from an ideal candidate. He certainly falls short of the standard set by several modern presidents. But Trump himself stands out from his predecessors as particularly bad on the corruption front. Not only does he still own and profit from businesses involved in dealings with foreign nationals, he has several adult children and in-laws who have business careers that are enmeshed with his political fortunes. To assess nepotism as an issue in the 2020 campaign requires a comprehensive look at the two candidates’ approaches.... Ivanka Trump is involved in policymaking in a way that’s simply unheard of for a presidential child, especially one with zero prior experience in politics and government: She has overseen hundreds of millions of dollars in federal grants. She represented the United States at the G20 summit. She was involved in shaping the 2017 tax cut that stands as her father’s main legislative achievement. She was even involved at a high level in a search for a new World Bank president. While not qualified for any of these roles, she’s also managed to repeatedly break the law in public service. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington once documented a 48-hour period in early October during which she violated the Hatch Act eight times. She then violated it 11 more times by October 20. " www.vox.com/21527215/hunter-biden-jared-ivanka-eric-don-junior
|
|
|
Post by Really Red on Oct 30, 2020 17:34:44 GMT
Tucker Carlson slowly backs away from it all. No, he isn't. He did say that Hunter is a man that "lost control of his demons and that pounding on a man and piling on him when he's already down is something that we don't want to be involved in." But he's very much not backing down from Joe Biden's corruption and will continue to report on it. Please tell me that you understand that Tucker Carlson is an entertainment show, NOT a news show. I am serious. I would like you to respond to that. Tucker Carlson and Fox News have argued that successfully in court. "Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes." So you understand you cannot trust Tucker Carlson, right?
|
|
|
Post by sasha on Oct 30, 2020 18:01:26 GMT
A nice little comparison of Hunter Biden vs. Donny Jr. and Vanky "It is true that on basic anti-nepotism grounds, Joe Biden is far from an ideal candidate. He certainly falls short of the standard set by several modern presidents. But Trump himself stands out from his predecessors as particularly bad on the corruption front. Not only does he still own and profit from businesses involved in dealings with foreign nationals, he has several adult children and in-laws who have business careers that are enmeshed with his political fortunes. To assess nepotism as an issue in the 2020 campaign requires a comprehensive look at the two candidates’ approaches.... Ivanka Trump is involved in policymaking in a way that’s simply unheard of for a presidential child, especially one with zero prior experience in politics and government: She has overseen hundreds of millions of dollars in federal grants. She represented the United States at the G20 summit. She was involved in shaping the 2017 tax cut that stands as her father’s main legislative achievement. She was even involved at a high level in a search for a new World Bank president. While not qualified for any of these roles, she’s also managed to repeatedly break the law in public service. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington once documented a 48-hour period in early October during which she violated the Hatch Act eight times. She then violated it 11 more times by October 20. " www.vox.com/21527215/hunter-biden-jared-ivanka-eric-don-juniorBy the way, I know the Trumps kids are absolutely awful and criminal. I only brought up the Don Jr. b/c I assumed that if he dating his dead brother's widow, I think people would find that gross and would have no problem saying it.
|
|
lizacreates
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,862
Aug 29, 2015 2:39:19 GMT
|
Post by lizacreates on Oct 30, 2020 18:27:25 GMT
?? “Assess.” On Monday Carlson definitively claimed that the info that vanished was “authentic, real and damning.” Now that it’s been found, why does it require assessing and not just be as authentic, real and damning AS IS? This was supposed to be a bombshell if you took Carlson’s word seriously. So did the bombshell bomb?
Lol. My guess on what’s more likely being assessed is Fox’s liability if they run with something of questionable provenance and unverified content. I would bet Fox’s lawyers told Carlson to slow his roll and that’s why his latest segment focused on his innuendos that UPS is part of some sort of conspiracy rather than the actual materials.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 30, 2020 20:29:55 GMT
Slimy F#$*(#*$sHow a fake persona laid the groundwork for a Hunter Biden conspiracy deluge A 64-page document that was later disseminated by close associates of President Donald Trump appears to be the work of a fake "intelligence firm." One month before a purported leak of files from Hunter Biden's laptop, a fake "intelligence" document about him went viral on the right-wing internet, asserting an elaborate conspiracy theory involving former Vice President Joe Biden's son and business in China. www.nbcnews.com/tech/security/how-fake-persona-laid-groundwork-hunter-biden-conspiracy-deluge-n1245387 This story has nothing to do with the laptop and his emails. Whoever at NBC that is pushing this as a story that debunks the emails certainly is "Slimy F#$*(#*$s " as you put it. It does nothing to debunk the emails. It relies on headline only readers to push the inuendo and insinuations in the article as debunking the emails, just like what's going on here. As a matter of fact the emails have been verified by someone who was IN the email chain and he has given his testimony to the FBI this week. Hunter Biden is currently under criminal investigation by the FBI. So that story does ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to debunk what is going on.
|
|
|
Post by dizzycheermom on Oct 30, 2020 20:55:38 GMT
Slimy F#$*(#*$sHow a fake persona laid the groundwork for a Hunter Biden conspiracy deluge A 64-page document that was later disseminated by close associates of President Donald Trump appears to be the work of a fake "intelligence firm." One month before a purported leak of files from Hunter Biden's laptop, a fake "intelligence" document about him went viral on the right-wing internet, asserting an elaborate conspiracy theory involving former Vice President Joe Biden's son and business in China. www.nbcnews.com/tech/security/how-fake-persona-laid-groundwork-hunter-biden-conspiracy-deluge-n1245387 This story has nothing to do with the laptop and his emails. Whoever at NBC that is pushing this as a story that debunks the emails certainly is "Slimy F#$*(#*$s " as you put it. It does nothing to debunk the emails. It relies on headline only readers to push the inuendo and insinuations in the article as debunking the emails, just like what's going on here. As a matter of fact the emails have been verified by someone who was IN the email chain and he has given his testimony to the FBI this week. Hunter Biden is currently under criminal investigation by the FBI. So that story does ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to debunk what is going on. Please share valid links for all of your info in this post and the one you posted up above. thanks
|
|
|
Post by sunshine on Oct 30, 2020 21:37:19 GMT
Tucker Carlson is a "conservative opinion commentator/host". He says that. Out loud. He doesn't pretend to be a journalist or try to play one on tv, unlike Brian Stelter, Chris Hayes, Joy Reid, Nicolle Wallace, Al Sharpton (still makes me laugh that MSNBC actually gave that man a show), just to name a few. The latter "progressive opinion commentators/hosts" I mentioned are followed like heroes here and quoted, retweeted and worshiped.
Until Carlson's guest Bobulinski is proven to be a liar, which as of today hasn't happened, I have no reason to not believe what he's saying. Biden himself hasn't said the laptop, emails, etc. are fake, so why are people working so hard to dismiss this, lol?
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 30, 2020 21:54:05 GMT
This story has nothing to do with the laptop and his emails. Whoever at NBC that is pushing this as a story that debunks the emails certainly is "Slimy F#$*(#*$s " as you put it. It does nothing to debunk the emails. It relies on headline only readers to push the inuendo and insinuations in the article as debunking the emails, just like what's going on here. As a matter of fact the emails have been verified by someone who was IN the email chain and he has given his testimony to the FBI this week. Hunter Biden is currently under criminal investigation by the FBI. So that story does ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to debunk what is going on. Please share valid links for all of your info in this post and the one you posted up above. thanks Sure. As soon as you request it from the other claims made on here in favor of Hunter/Joe and they comply. Hmmm.... and why do I get the feeling that NOTHING showing Hunter/Joe in a bad light will be acceptable under your qualifying requirement.
|
|
lizacreates
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,862
Aug 29, 2015 2:39:19 GMT
|
Post by lizacreates on Oct 30, 2020 22:01:38 GMT
Salon: Fox News reporter Jacqui Heinrich combed through all of the texts and emails released by Bobulinski and determined that his claims about Biden being "The Chairman" were false. "I completed searching all of Tony Bobulinski's emails," she wrote on Twitter. "They establish: the "Chairman" is China; NO ROLE for Joe Biden in emails/docs; Tony Bobulinski states himself there are NO OTHER MEMBERS besides Hunter Biden, Jim Biden, Rob Walker, James Gillar, and Bobulinski." Heinrich's tweet came shortly after the Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday night that corporate records it reviewed showed "no role for Joe Biden" in any of SinoHawk's dealings.
Fox News: Fox News has reviewed emails from Bobulinski related to the venture — and they don't show that the elder Biden had business dealings with SinoHawk Holdings, or took any payments from them or the Chinese. Fox News previously reported an email thread, initially released by the New York Post, which purportedly showed an equity split proposition that would benefit "the big guy," whom sources ‒ and Bobulinski ‒ claimed was Joe Biden. According to the Post's reporting and Bobulinski, the proposed equity split referenced "20" for "H" and "10 held by H for the big guy?" with no further details. According to separate emails obtained and analyzed by Fox News, the "chairman" appears to refer to China.
|
|
lizacreates
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,862
Aug 29, 2015 2:39:19 GMT
|
Post by lizacreates on Oct 30, 2020 22:02:54 GMT
CNN: In a carefully worded letter, Jill C. Tyson, FBI assistant director for congressional affairs, wrote in response to questions from Homeland Security Committee Chairman Ron Johnson that "we have nothing to add at this time to the October 19th public statement by the Director of National Intelligence about the available actionable intelligence." In in its letter to Johnson, who has spent months investigating Biden's son, the FBI declined to provide any additional information and said it could not confirm or deny any investigation, a similar response it has given to stories about the purported Hunter Biden emails.
Politico: So far, despite the renewed pressure, the FBI has not disclosed the existence of any investigation related to Hunter Biden, and the bureau’s typical practice is to neither confirm nor deny whether any particular probe exists, with a few notable exceptions.
This is exactly why Trump has been ranting about Wray.
|
|
|
Post by sunshine on Oct 30, 2020 22:06:15 GMT
And seriously, people watch and follow Joy Reid? Ms. Homophobe that claimed her blog was hacked and was being investigated by the FBI? Whatever happened to that investigation? I can't seem to find any type of update, but she did good for herself being elevated to prime time on MSNBC. That sure is swell.
At least CNBC's Steve Scully admitted he lied about his Twitter hacking. The same can't be said about the beloved Joy Reid. How many here have decided she's not worthy, or should I say trustworthy?
|
|
lizacreates
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,862
Aug 29, 2015 2:39:19 GMT
|
Post by lizacreates on Oct 30, 2020 22:06:52 GMT
Republican Inquiry Finds No Evidence of Wrongdoing by Biden: link
|
|
|
Post by sunshine on Oct 30, 2020 22:11:49 GMT
What? You mean Fox is doing their due diligence? Say it ain't so!
|
|
lizacreates
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,862
Aug 29, 2015 2:39:19 GMT
|
Post by lizacreates on Oct 30, 2020 22:13:13 GMT
|
|