|
|
Post by sunshine on Nov 1, 2020 12:52:06 GMT
What “link” are you waiting for from me? Bobulinsky’s claims? Find the interview and listen to it yourself if you care. Zingermack’s Twitter re-post from some random person giving false info? If you care to find the Carlson clips, you’ll hear for yourself. Beyond that I’m on my phone and not going to try to search, copy and paste for you. In other words, we should believe this guy Bobulinski and Tucker Carlson over well respected journalists who investigated and found nothing there? The Walll Street Journal refused when Giuliani and his cronies tried to give them the story. Only the NY Post was willing to print the story. I think you and other Trump supporters are convinced that Hunter and Joe Biden are crooked, despite lack of convincing evidence. However, you’re willing to overlook Trump and his family’s widely reported corruption? Keep on living in your alternate reality. I hope all of you are in for a shock on Nov 3 when you realize that the majority of Americans don’t believe or don’t care about this Hunter Biden nonsense.Truth be told, I really don't care or expect you to believe anything. Minds were made up long before this story and I don't think it will sway anyone. So sorry to disappoint, but very little shocks me anymore, and that will include whatever the election outcome might be, with or without this story.
|
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Nov 1, 2020 19:42:55 GMT
www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/here-s-what-happened-when-nbc-news-tried-report-alleged-n1245533
James Rosen, a reporter for the conservative-leaning Sinclair Broadcast Group, the nation's largest operator of local television stations, reported this week that a Justice Department official told him the FBI had opened a criminal investigation into Hunter Biden and his associates last year focused on allegations of money-laundering — and that the probe remains active.NBC News has not confirmed any such investigation
|
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Nov 2, 2020 1:16:32 GMT
As far as valid and trustworthy, the list is pretty long. Almost any mainstream media, NPR, PBS, NYT, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, ABC, CBS, NBC Right. None of those news outlets would ever suppress a news story. NBC oops -Ronan Farrow's Harvey Weinstein story ABC oops -Amy Robach's Jeffrey Epstein story CBS oops -John Dickerson "Joe Biden has an ally in the news cycle" going on to explain in a very twisted justification that they won't cover it if it makes Joe look bad, they want to focus more on what makes Trump look bad. NPR oops -tried to claim it was Russian disinformation and that's why they won't cover the story. as did several other outlets. That has been thoroughly debunked by the Director of Intelligence John Ratcliffe. NBC oops -dishonestly tried to push an unrelated story that they counted on people assuming was related, as a debunking of the actual story. It didn't debunk the story. So valid and trustworthy.   |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 11:38:58 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 2, 2020 1:21:14 GMT
As far as valid and trustworthy, the list is pretty long. Almost any mainstream media, NPR, PBS, NYT, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, ABC, CBS, NBC Right. None of those news outlets would ever suppress a news story. NBC oops -Ronan Farrow's Harvey Weinstein story ABC oops -Amy Robach's Jeffrey Epstein story CBS oops -John Dickerson "Joe Biden has an ally in the news cycle" going on to explain in a very twisted justification that they won't cover it if it makes Joe look bad, they want to focus more on what makes Trump look bad. NPR oops -tried to claim it was Russian disinformation and that's why they won't cover the story. as did several other outlets. That has been thoroughly debunked by the Director of Intelligence John Ratcliffe. NBC oops -dishonestly tried to push an unrelated story that they counted on people assuming was related, as a debunking of the actual story. It didn't debunk the story. So valid and trustworthy.   Well at least you can count that on one hand. With Fox, however, we have lost track of all of their misinformation and outright lies they spew out. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Nov 2, 2020 2:15:47 GMT
Right. None of those news outlets would ever suppress a news story. NBC oops -Ronan Farrow's Harvey Weinstein story ABC oops -Amy Robach's Jeffrey Epstein story CBS oops -John Dickerson "Joe Biden has an ally in the news cycle" going on to explain in a very twisted justification that they won't cover it if it makes Joe look bad, they want to focus more on what makes Trump look bad. NPR oops -tried to claim it was Russian disinformation and that's why they won't cover the story. as did several other outlets. That has been thoroughly debunked by the Director of Intelligence John Ratcliffe. NBC oops -dishonestly tried to push an unrelated story that they counted on people assuming was related, as a debunking of the actual story. It didn't debunk the story. So valid and trustworthy.  Well at least you can count that on one hand. With Fox, however, we have lost track of all of their misinformation and outright lies they spew out. Yeah, that makes it okay for them to suppress news.  |
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Nov 2, 2020 3:20:09 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by lucyg on Nov 2, 2020 3:33:30 GMT
Plus which, John Ratcliffe is not a reliable reporter. He knows nothing about national security and was given the post of DNI (after being rejected first time out) because of his rabid partisanship. So just because John Ratcliffe said it doesn’t mean it’s true ... in fact, it pretty much guarantees it’s a lie. I’m sorry, pixiechick, but it is pathetic that you’re lapping up this unproven, likely unprovable nonsense that dropped a week before the election. You’ve heard the term October Surprise, right? The only real surprise is that this story is so weak. |
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Nov 2, 2020 3:34:33 GMT
As far as valid and trustworthy, the list is pretty long. Almost any mainstream media, NPR, PBS, NYT, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, ABC, CBS, NBC Right. None of those news outlets would ever suppress a news story. NBC oops -Ronan Farrow's Harvey Weinstein story ABC oops -Amy Robach's Jeffrey Epstein story CBS oops -John Dickerson "Joe Biden has an ally in the news cycle" going on to explain in a very twisted justification that they won't cover it if it makes Joe look bad, they want to focus more on what makes Trump look bad. NPR oops -tried to claim it was Russian disinformation and that's why they won't cover the story. as did several other outlets. That has been thoroughly debunked by the Director of Intelligence John Ratcliffe. NBC oops -dishonestly tried to push an unrelated story that they counted on people assuming was related, as a debunking of the actual story. It didn't debunk the story. So valid and trustworthy.  ABC & Amy Robach —-ABC didn’t suppress the story, they did not find it to their reporting standards. They’re not like Fox, who fabricated stories and embellishes all the time. “ABC News responded: "At the time, not all of our reporting met our standards to air, but we have never stopped investigating the story. Ever since we’ve had a team on this investigation and substantial resources dedicated to it. That work has led to a two-hour documentary and six-part podcast that will air in the new year." Robach, who co-anchors 20/20 and reports for Good Morning America, provided a more extensive response explaining her comments, which she did not intend to be aired. "As a journalist, as the Epstein story continued to unfold last summer, I was caught in a private moment of frustration," she said. "I was upset that an important interview I had conducted with Virginia Roberts didn’t air because we could not obtain sufficient corroborating evidence to meet ABC’s editorial standards about her allegations. My comments about Prince Andrew and her allegation that she had seen Bill Clinton on Epstein’s private island were in reference to what Virginia Roberts said in that interview in 2015. I was referencing her allegations — not what ABC News had verified through our reporting." Robach continued: "The interview itself, while I was disappointed it didn’t air, didn’t meet our standards. In the years since no one ever told me or the team to stop reporting on Jeffrey Epstein, and we have continued to aggressively pursue this important story." Not to mention that the leaker was James OKeefe, from Project Veritas, a well known liar, conspiracy theorist, and pretend undercover trash reporter, who also fakes and lies about what he’s recording. He’s perfect for you Gia/pixiechick—you should date him—you both have the same gaslighting, “alternate Facts” MO, you have a lot in common with him. |
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Nov 2, 2020 3:55:30 GMT
Well at least you can count that on one hand. With Fox, however, we have lost track of all of their misinformation and outright lies they spew out. Yeah, that makes it okay for them to suppress news. Once again, Gia aka pixie chick is a gaslighting liar. Anything she writes should be taken as lying propaganda. Her pathetic attempt at pushing a narrative of a supposed revelation/admission from CBS John Dickerson stating Biden “has an ally in the news” is so grossly irresponsible and only half of the sentence he actually stated. This is what John D. ACTUALLY Stated— “Joe Biden has an ally in the news cycle, which is, if President Trump tries to shift the turf onto the Biden family, for the purposes of muddying Joe Biden, the news cycle keeps returning to the central piece of this campaign which is coronavirus and the president’s response to it and the country has a very negative view of that,” Dickerson said. DIckerson then said the news cycle will “keep voters focused on that very bad issue for the president," rather than devoting time to the laptop's contents and questions about the family's overseas business dealings.” No where in what Dickerson stated in in interview did he mention that the news won’t publish anything that makes Biden look bad as you claim. He was stating that the news cycle was focused on what mattered most to the American people. You pixiechick/Gia are such a fucking lying propaganda machine. You are easily disproven every time you post. |
|
|
|
Post by crazy4scraps on Nov 2, 2020 5:33:53 GMT
In other words, we should believe this guy Bobulinski and Tucker Carlson over well respected journalists who investigated and found nothing there? The Walll Street Journal refused when Giuliani and his cronies tried to give them the story. Only the NY Post was willing to print the story. I think you and other Trump supporters are convinced that Hunter and Joe Biden are crooked, despite lack of convincing evidence. However, you’re willing to overlook Trump and his family’s widely reported corruption? Keep on living in your alternate reality. I hope all of you are in for a shock on Nov 3 when you realize that the majority of Americans don’t believe or don’t care about this Hunter Biden nonsense. , I so hope you are right. My anxiety is through the roof. I just want the lies to stop.YEAH, THAT. OMG, the endless, relentless countless lies. So many lies are flying right now that even CNN’s Daniel Dale who has been trying to document and count all of Trump’s false claims throughout his presidency has waved the white flag of surrender saying, “I had to make a decision to stop updating over the last month and just focus on the big stuff. Because the president is talking so much — just the sheer volume of words right now is very large and so many of them are false that if I tried to keep up comprehensively as I have for the past four years, I wouldn’t have found time to write the most important stories about the most egregious stuff he’s saying. So I’ve had to make an executive decision to put it on hold for now.”    |
|
