|
Post by gar on Mar 8, 2021 17:49:29 GMT
I imagine “The Firm” could also include the network of royal aides, many of whom personally and professionally prioritize image and/or “their” royal - a network not unlike the Vatican Curia: old guard, hierarchal, tradition-bound, conservative, jockeying, class-conscious. I imagine family members might have much more daily contact with/advice from this network than with actual family members. It absolutely does...they all have their own offices and teams but I'm not sure they vie against each other for prioritisation. There's a strong pecking order that's well established already in place. I would like to think the teams are younger, less old guard than they have been in the past but I don't know.
|
|
|
Post by pjaye on Mar 8, 2021 17:49:56 GMT
I'm talking about how much Meghan's descriptions of her experiences resonated with a seemingly large segment of Black Americans. Of course it did, she knew exactly what she was doing and that's exactly why she did it. Counting on all the Americans to fall for her lies hook line and sinker, and based on this thread alone - it's worked out beautifully for her.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 12:50:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 8, 2021 17:50:48 GMT
Yes, I do find it offensive and insulting when someone from another country tells me to go look on line and benefit from some strangers knowledge about the constitution and governance of my own country. ETA and for the record I haven't watched the whole show so I am not prepared to comment on something that I haven't seen or heard as yet. There have been extract shared on social media regarding Archie's title. It was that and that alone I was commenting on from a constitutional aspect only. What do you think about racism in the UK? The same as in the rest of the world, there is no place for it here or anywhere else.
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on Mar 8, 2021 17:52:03 GMT
Also related: I can also imagine that seeking emergency mental health treatment within this structure - or even deciding whether to access the help yourself - would be fraught. Again: image, protocol, tradition, media. How could that not create hesitance, indecision, reluctance? This would be a far different situation than morning sickness. Harry has had mental help in the past though and both he and Prive Eilliam and Kate have been championing mental health and how important is is for someone's well being for the last 5 years and more recently over the last year before H & M left they championed another charity they founded. They were very active in promoting it, all four of them. So the help was there and certainly the contacts. So you are saying you don’t believe Meghan when she says she was suicidal pregnant and told she couldn’t seek help for fear of optics? Does that strike you as heartless when you see it worded that way? You gonna answer that question about racism in the UK? Also you mentioned not having seen the interview in it’s entirety....did you see the link of royal commentators who did the same thing? Thoughts? I see that you briefly commented on racism in the UK. Your response was vague care to expound? You said it has no place? But is there space?
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on Mar 8, 2021 17:55:09 GMT
I imagine “The Firm” could also include the network of royal aides, many of whom personally and professionally prioritize image and/or “their” royal - a network not unlike the Vatican Curia: old guard, hierarchal, tradition-bound, conservative, jockeying, class-conscious. I imagine family members might have much more daily contact with/advice from this network than with actual family members. Related: I would not be at all surprised that racism exists within this structure - family members or aides. Why is it so hard to believe people make offensive - if veiled - comments or innuendo? Isn't it also possible that someone wondered out loud "I wonder what color hair he or she will have?" and now it is being interpreted as being a racist comment. Not every curious thought is rooted in racism but you can certainly turn it that way if it benefits you (them) How does one benefit from being treated poorly based on the color of their skin?
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on Mar 8, 2021 17:55:35 GMT
What do you think about racism in the UK? The same as in the rest of the world, there is no place for it here or anywhere else. That’s it?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 12:50:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 8, 2021 18:00:12 GMT
Yes, I do find it offensive and insulting when someone from another country tells me to go look on line and benefit from some strangers knowledge about the constitution and governance of my own country. I am sorry I was not more clear about the scope of what I was referring to. I'm talking about feelings and experiences, not constitution and governance. And I do believe there is a lot of value in listening to others about that. Are we now only discussing the racism accusation and not what was covered in the rest of the interview? Sorry my mistake I thought we were discussing all that was said. I admit I've only seen snippets on some of what has been shared on line.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 12:50:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 8, 2021 18:04:55 GMT
Unfortunately there is racism in the uk , sad but true .
There were alot of tv programmes leading up to Brexit stirring up racism against people who were living or working here from other countries.
This is not a thing to be proud of.
|
|
|
Post by busy on Mar 8, 2021 18:05:40 GMT
I am sorry I was not more clear about the scope of what I was referring to. I'm talking about feelings and experiences, not constitution and governance. And I do believe there is a lot of value in listening to others about that. Are we now only discussing the racism accusation and not what was covered in the rest of the interview? Sorry my mistake I thought we were discussing all that was said. I admit I've only seen snippets on some of what has been shared on line. As I said in my previous response to you, "I'm not talking about the Archie title thing at all, nor just to Brits. I'm talking about how much Meghan's descriptions of her experiences resonated with a seemingly large segment of Black Americans. Things here that are being dismissed as "just the way it is, suck it up" are being perceived as painful microaggressions (and some not micro- at all) and gaslighting that many people of color have regularly experienced in different contexts. There's an undercurrent here that she's lying about her experiences and feelings but the fact that they clearly ring true with a lot of people who've been on the receiving end of similar treatment (again, obviously in different contexts) is something I think we should all consider."
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on Mar 8, 2021 18:05:58 GMT
I am sorry I was not more clear about the scope of what I was referring to. I'm talking about feelings and experiences, not constitution and governance. And I do believe there is a lot of value in listening to others about that. Are we now only discussing the racism accusation and not what was covered in the rest of the interview? Sorry my mistake I thought we were discussing all that was said. I admit I've only seen snippets on some of what has been shared on line. Ah right you wanna talk about everything but just like Americans! Sorry I’ll let you get back to telling us the inside scoop from a Brit perspective. All before seeing the interview like those royal commentators
|
|
gabby80
Shy Member
Posts: 18
Nov 29, 2020 21:12:41 GMT
|
Post by gabby80 on Mar 8, 2021 18:09:19 GMT
Isn't it also possible that someone wondered out loud "I wonder what color hair he or she will have?" and now it is being interpreted as being a racist comment. And her treatment by the media? And it going unchecked? That has nothing to do with what I posted. And for the record the media goes unchecked on a lot of shitty biased reporting.
|
|
AmeliaBloomer
Drama Llama
Posts: 6,842
Location: USA
Jun 26, 2014 5:01:45 GMT
|
Post by AmeliaBloomer on Mar 8, 2021 18:10:26 GMT
I imagine “The Firm” could also include the network of royal aides, many of whom personally and professionally prioritize image and/or “their” royal - a network not unlike the Vatican Curia: old guard, hierarchal, tradition-bound, conservative, jockeying, class-conscious. I imagine family members might have much more daily contact with/advice from this network than with actual family members. Related: I would not be at all surprised that racism exists within this structure - family members or aides. Why is it so hard to believe people make offensive - if veiled - comments or innuendo? Isn't it also possible that someone wondered out loud "I wonder what color hair he or she will have?" and now it is being interpreted as being a racist comment. Not every curious thought is rooted in racism but you can certainly turn it that way if it benefits you (them) Yes, of course it’s possible. But it’s concurrently impossible that anybody here knows that no racist innuendo was expressed - or, for example, that it’s doubtful Camilla would say anything racially offensive. (Just an example upthread; I know almost nothing about her.) I can neither deny nor doubt the presence of racism in strangers. If it’s reported by somebody of color, especially, I’m open to believing it. My comment was conceived within my own life context of “Almost everybody, including me, harbors some racist thoughts, so why NOT this family and their staff. Why the disbelief?”
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 12:50:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 8, 2021 18:12:58 GMT
Harry has had mental help in the past though and both he and Prive Eilliam and Kate have been championing mental health and how important is is for someone's well being for the last 5 years and more recently over the last year before H & M left they championed another charity they founded. They were very active in promoting it, all four of them. So the help was there and certainly the contacts. So you are saying you don’t believe Meghan when she says she was suicidal pregnant and told she couldn’t seek help for fear of optics? Does that strike you as heartless when you see it worded that way? You gonna answer that question about racism in the UK? Also you mentioned not having seen the interview in it’s entirety....did you see the link of royal commentators who did the same thing? Thoughts? I see that you briefly commented on racism in the UK. Your response was vague care to expound? You said it has no place? But is there space? You are really twisting everything your read Olan. I haven't once said I don't believe what she is saying. For starters I haven't seen the whole interview so it would be impossible for me to comment on a big part of it. What I don't understand (and that isn't the same as not believing her) both Megan and Prince Harry together with Prince William and Kate have done so much in promoting mental health over the years and had had great success and praise for their work, why was it not there for her and why did she not seek help from the organizations that she was working in covering mental health. It's common knowledge that Prince William persuaded Prince Harry to finally seek help ( before he met Meghan) so the contacts must be there for her. The bigger question here is why was it not there for her when she needed it, having taken such an active part in promoting such help.
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on Mar 8, 2021 18:13:06 GMT
And her treatment by the media? And it going unchecked? That has nothing to do with what I posted. And for the record the media goes unchecked on a lot of shitty biased reporting. You said the coloring comment could be innocent enough and shouldn’t lead anyone to believe Meghan was treated like umm a Black woman and I asked well what about the media and it going unchecked by the family. She was quoted as saying like “..... would lie to protect one another but couldn’t tell the truth to protect me and my husband” Of course the media is often unchecked but if Harry believes it contributed to his mothers death the fact that he couldn’t depend on his very powerful family to at the very least not invite them into the castle....well we can see why he felt he needed to leave to protect his family.
|
|
MerryMom
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,566
Jul 24, 2014 19:51:57 GMT
|
Post by MerryMom on Mar 8, 2021 18:13:17 GMT
Pjaye, I don’t have a dog in the fight, but you really are invested in letting us know how much you dislike Meghan. You have around a dozen replies/retorts in this thread alone. We get your view. Everything the woman does or says will be through that lens for you. We get your opinion. Well clearly you don't because you've missed half of it. Why are you choosing to focus ONLY on Meghan?...I've said just as much about Harry, but you focus on Meghan...makes for better bitchy handslapping doesn't it? If my whole opinion isn't getting through - might have to post some more. Pjaye, but you save extra vitriol for Meghan. Bless your heart.
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on Mar 8, 2021 18:14:18 GMT
So you are saying you don’t believe Meghan when she says she was suicidal pregnant and told she couldn’t seek help for fear of optics? Does that strike you as heartless when you see it worded that way? You gonna answer that question about racism in the UK? Also you mentioned not having seen the interview in it’s entirety....did you see the link of royal commentators who did the same thing? Thoughts? I see that you briefly commented on racism in the UK. Your response was vague care to expound? You said it has no place? But is there space? You are really twisting everything your read Olan. I haven't once said I don't believe what she is saying. For starters I haven't seen the whole interview so it would be impossible for me to comment on a big part of it. What I don't understand (and that isn't the same as not believing her) both Megan and Prince Harry together with Prince William and Kate have done so much in promoting mental health over the years and had had great success and praise for their work, why was it not there for her and why did she not seek help from the organizations that she was working in covering mental health. It's common knowledge that Prince William persuaded Prince Harry to finally seek help ( before he met Meghan) so the contacts must be there for her. The bigger question here is why was it not there for her when she needed it, having taken such an active part in promoting such help. I didn’t twist anything. You’ve quoted me so I’m assuming you can read the “So are you saying” part of the question.
|
|
|
Post by mom on Mar 8, 2021 18:18:04 GMT
I gave in and watched the interview.
Honestly, I would find their claims more credible if they were naming names and giving specific details (time, place, etc). As it is, Harry has contradicted Meghan on much of her claims. I will say I am shocked Meghan was surprised that someone within the RF would possibly make racist remarks. Harry has his own past with being racially insensitive (at best) thats been well documented.
I also dont believe that no one educated Meghan about what was expected of her. There are layers upon layers of people who's job within the Firm it is to make sure everyone knows whats expected and what protocol is. They instructed Meghan on how to escape being held hostage but not that she had to curtsey HMTQ? I dont believe it.
|
|
gabby80
Shy Member
Posts: 18
Nov 29, 2020 21:12:41 GMT
|
Post by gabby80 on Mar 8, 2021 18:18:10 GMT
Isn't it also possible that someone wondered out loud "I wonder what color hair he or she will have?" and now it is being interpreted as being a racist comment. Not every curious thought is rooted in racism but you can certainly turn it that way if it benefits you (them) How does one benefit from being treated poorly based on the color of their skin? One doesn't. But they have found a way to market every slight and cause, real or imagined, that they have the least little claim to. Racism is bad so don't twist my words. But someone who I assume is a close family member simply wondering what an unborn child might look like - will he or she resemble the mom or dad - isn't something that is automatic racism. Unless you want it to be for some personal benefit - media attention, another cause to champion, etc. There isn't a pregnant couple who hasn't wondered or had a discussion before their baby is born about what the child might look like.
|
|
|
Post by Spongemom Scrappants on Mar 8, 2021 18:18:32 GMT
I cannot stop thinking about a group of people telling two young boys who just lost their mother in a tragic accident that they needed to walk behind her casket with thousands and thousands of people gazing on. And they had to stand strong in doing so. It breaks my heart. There's a strong parallel to the experience that JFK's children had when he was assassinated. When you live a life that brings every eye on you, it is not uncommon. Not to say it's right, but it happens.
|
|
|
Post by auroraborealis on Mar 8, 2021 18:19:40 GMT
Both of them would have/should have known why and that it had nothing to do with the colour of Archie's skin. Harry has cousins with children, all white and non of them have titles but they are all great-grandchildren of the Queen. Why should they expect different for theirs?To me, what was different about Archie vs. his cousins is he is a direct grandchild of Charles, future king. With the Queen in her 90's, presumably Charles will become king while Archie is still a child. So "delaying" or leaving the open the option to not give Archie a title once Charles is king, vs. giving him one at birth, seems overly controlling, punitive, and influenced by their attitudes towards Meghan and Archie's heritage (yeah, racism). Seeing Harry and William grow up, did people honestly ever think Harry's future children would not be prince/princesses, and only William's?
|
|
|
Post by sideways on Mar 8, 2021 18:21:08 GMT
So you are saying you don’t believe Meghan when she says she was suicidal pregnant and told she couldn’t seek help for fear of optics? Does that strike you as heartless when you see it worded that way? You gonna answer that question about racism in the UK? Also you mentioned not having seen the interview in it’s entirety....did you see the link of royal commentators who did the same thing? Thoughts? I see that you briefly commented on racism in the UK. Your response was vague care to expound? You said it has no place? But is there space? You are really twisting everything your read Olan. I haven't once said I don't believe what she is saying. For starters I haven't seen the whole interview so it would be impossible for me to comment on a big part of it. What I don't understand (and that isn't the same as not believing her) both Megan and Prince Harry together with Prince William and Kate have done so much in promoting mental health over the years and had had great success and praise for their work, why was it not there for her and why did she not seek help from the organizations that she was working in covering mental health. It's common knowledge that Prince William persuaded Prince Harry to finally seek help ( before he met Meghan) so the contacts must be there for her. The bigger question here is why was it not there for her when she needed it, having taken such an active part in promoting such help. My guess? It’s one thing to seek counseling. It’s quite another to need help for what could be considered a mental break, such as being suicidal. Also, someone compared Meghan needing help when she was suicidal to Kate’s being hospitalized for extreme morning sickness. Seriously? I doubt the RF looks at morning sickness as a weakness.
|
|
AmeliaBloomer
Drama Llama
Posts: 6,842
Location: USA
Jun 26, 2014 5:01:45 GMT
|
Post by AmeliaBloomer on Mar 8, 2021 18:23:01 GMT
Also related: I can also imagine that seeking emergency mental health treatment within this structure - or even deciding whether to access the help yourself - would be fraught. Again: image, protocol, tradition, media. How could that not create hesitance, indecision, reluctance? This would be a far different situation than morning sickness. Harry has had mental help in the past though and both he and Prive Eilliam and Kate have been championing mental health and how important is is for someone's well being for the last 5 years and more recently over the last year before H & M left they championed another charity they founded. They were very active in promoting it, all four of them. So the help was there and certainly the contacts. That’s great that they champion mental health. And I definitely believe the resources exist and are accessible. I mean, it’s not America, so there’s that. (Insert wry emoji.) That acknowledged, I have no idea whether that means it’s impossible that Meghan could have been stonewalled, deterred, counseled differently. At the least, I think an emergency psychiatric admission is different than the type of (presumedly) afternoon-appointment type of therapy that Harry might have received, and could have garnered a press and social media storm in a time when Meghan was already under a microscope. But I really don’t know. Maybe Meghan is flat-out lying. But I do believe it’s also possible she was living/working among people that could be disproportionately influenced by the image fallout, no matter how accessible the services. (ETA: Or she could feel reluctant to do it on her own.) And I still believe it’s a very different situation than morning sickness treatment, even in the most enlightened, pro-active contexts. Speaking of believing, I really should watch this interview and see if I believe what I believe. Heh.
|
|
|
Post by sideways on Mar 8, 2021 18:23:41 GMT
How does one benefit from being treated poorly based on the color of their skin? One doesn't. But they have found a way to market every slight and cause, real or imagined, that they have the least little claim to. Racism is bad so don't twist my words. But someone who I assume is a close family member simply wondering what an unborn child might look like - will he or she resemble the mom or dad - isn't something that is automatic racism. Unless you want it to be for some personal benefit - media attention, another cause to champion, etc. There isn't a pregnant couple who hasn't wondered or had a discussion before their baby is born about what the child might look like. This post has more stretches than an Olympic gymnastics competition.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 12:50:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 8, 2021 18:25:47 GMT
I cannot stop thinking about a group of people telling two young boys who just lost their mother in a tragic accident that they needed to walk behind her casket with thousands and thousands of people gazing on. And they had to stand strong in doing so. It breaks my heart. There's a strong parallel to the experience that JFK's children had when he was assassinated. When you live a life that brings every eye on you, it is not uncommon. Not to say it's right, but it happens. I agree. There are also many countries who's culture carries it out for all funerals where the males walk and follows the coffin.
|
|
AmeliaBloomer
Drama Llama
Posts: 6,842
Location: USA
Jun 26, 2014 5:01:45 GMT
|
Post by AmeliaBloomer on Mar 8, 2021 18:26:01 GMT
I imagine “The Firm” could also include the network of royal aides, many of whom personally and professionally prioritize image and/or “their” royal - a network not unlike the Vatican Curia: old guard, hierarchal, tradition-bound, conservative, jockeying, class-conscious. I imagine family members might have much more daily contact with/advice from this network than with actual family members. It absolutely does...they all have their own offices and teams but I'm not sure they vie against each other for prioritisation. There's a strong pecking order that's well established already in place. I would like to think the teams are younger, less old guard than they have been in the past but I don't know. Are you saying I shouldn’t base all my palace intrigue assumptions on “The Crown?” and bad Princess Di made-for-TV movies?
|
|
carhoch
Pearl Clutcher
Be yourself everybody else is already taken
Posts: 3,044
Location: We’re RV’s so It change all the time .
Jun 28, 2014 21:46:39 GMT
|
Post by carhoch on Mar 8, 2021 18:26:35 GMT
Wow! I will never think of you again the same way I have over the last few years, ever. She’s Lauren 2.0. Vile, racist, and crazy. I thought the same thing.
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on Mar 8, 2021 18:27:29 GMT
How does one benefit from being treated poorly based on the color of their skin? One doesn't. But they have found a way to market every slight and cause, real or imagined, that they have the least little claim to. Racism is bad so don't twist my words. But someone who I assume is a close family member simply wondering what an unborn child might look like - will he or she resemble the mom or dad - isn't something that is automatic racism. Unless you want it to be for some personal benefit - media attention, another cause to champion, etc. There isn't a pregnant couple who hasn't wondered or had a discussion before their baby is born about what the child might look like. Racism is bad? 😂😂 Wow we can tell you’ve got a strong stance. And enough with accusing me of twisting words. You were the one who mentioned personal benefits from experiencing racism. I didn’t place any words in your mouth I simply asked what is the benefit you were speaking of. My favorite thing about 2peas is the quote feature and making sure people have to stand by the words that they feel comfortable typing. My reputation should be one of receipts because there is no need to twist someone’s word. Even coded it’s clear the intent.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 12:50:50 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 8, 2021 18:33:45 GMT
Both of them would have/should have known why and that it had nothing to do with the colour of Archie's skin. Harry has cousins with children, all white and non of them have titles but they are all great-grandchildren of the Queen. Why should they expect different for theirs?To me, what was different about Archie vs. his cousins is he is a direct grandchild of Charles, future king. With the Queen in her 90's, presumably Charles will become king while Archie is still a child. So "delaying" or leaving the open the option to not give Archie a title once Charles is king, vs. giving him one at birth, seems overly controlling, punitive, and influenced by their attitudes towards Meghan and Archie's heritage (yeah, racism).Seeing Harry and William grow up, did people honestly ever think Harry's future children would not be prince/princesses, and only William's? Not at all. Please separate the Royal Family from the governance of this country and the constitution of the Monarchy. The Queen is a a mother, grandmother and a great grandmother but she is also the Head of State and as such is obligated to carry out those duties as laid down by law and has nothing to do with her as a grandmother or a G grandmother.
|
|
|
Post by pjaye on Mar 8, 2021 19:05:38 GMT
Seeing Harry and William grow up, did people honestly ever think Harry's future children would not be prince/princesses, and only William's? Yes - because some of us understand the basics of how it all works. William is likely to be King and then his children will be next in line, barring some tragedy Harry's kids are very unlikely ever to be monarchs. Not every grandchild or greatgrandchild of the Queen is a Prince or Princess...some are just Master or Miss & Archie is not being treated any differently to them.
|
|
|
Post by gar on Mar 8, 2021 19:09:02 GMT
To me, what was different about Archie vs. his cousins is he is a direct grandchild of Charles, future king. With the Queen in her 90's, presumably Charles will become king while Archie is still a child. So "delaying" or leaving the open the option to not give Archie a title once Charles is king, vs. giving him one at birth, seems overly controlling, punitive, and influenced by their attitudes towards Meghan and Archie's heritage (yeah, racism). You do realise she doesn't just make this stuff up as she goes along don't you...?
|
|