Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 17:20:48 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 9, 2021 9:43:30 GMT
I was just wondering, has it aired over in the UK yet? I know clips have been released, probably transcripts too, but watching the body language and hearing their words also made up part of my reaction. Yes, it aired here last night ( Monday)
|
|
|
Post by mollycoddle on Mar 9, 2021 11:14:23 GMT
Well, I cracked and watched it. Here is what made my jaw drop: “A running theme so far is Meghan purposely not researching the inner workings of the family before joining. She said Harry asked her if she knew how to curtsy five minutes before she met the queen. “We were in the car!” It is incredible that she wouldn’t have done some research to know what she was getting into. That would help to explain why she struggled so much. She said something about how growing up, living where she did (LA?) she saw celebrities all of the time. And she knew celebrities. Is it possible that she conflated the Royal life and the life of a celebrity? I don’t know, but that, together with tabloid headlines, would explain a lot. I have no problem believing that she got depressed and felt suicidal. I do find it hard to believe that someone as resourceful as she couldn’t figure out how to get some sort of help.It was interesting, and it reminded me of what a skillful interviewer Oprah is. When I’m depressed my ability to think things through is severely compromised. Fair point.
|
|
|
Post by peasapie on Mar 9, 2021 12:50:34 GMT
I think the bigger picture is being missed while people are arguing about how many angels dance on the head of a pin. The Royals are closely tied to the Commonwealth, many countries of which are from Africa and the Caribbean. What are they to think about any member of the Royal family being concerned about the baby’s skin color? This is not a difficult topic here but I’ll spell it out. R-A-C-I-S-M.
I would have been outraged if someone was gossiping and speculating like this about my child. She’s a lion mama and I respect her. I’d be depressed during pregnancy, too, if I was in the public eye and my family members were speculating about my kid’s skin color.
Megan was stuck in the same hornet’s nest as Diana, another lion mama, who reacted the same way during her lifetime. The important difference is Megan’s husband is standing by her side and doing all he can to protect his family. All this “she should have known” nonsense is appalling. Every one of us has had life issues where we went into situations blinded by something — love, ambition, loneliness, hope — and were sadly disappointed. Who can’t relate to that?? Who among us hasn’t done that? And didn’t we want help?
I think she is a very courageous woman who is standing up to both racism and to a system that makes puppets of its members. And Harry’s brother, if no one else, needs to step in and work this out so that, minimally, Harry has protection for his family. It’s not a big ask. Beyond that, the royals will need to repair their relationship with Commonwealth countries of color. I hope all of that happens and that the Queen will have the strength and insight to see it through.
|
|
gabby80
Shy Member
Posts: 18
Nov 29, 2020 21:12:41 GMT
|
Post by gabby80 on Mar 9, 2021 13:41:11 GMT
The clips released today show Harry first saying he won't talk about what was said and then on further questioning he says it was "What will the kids look like."
|
|
|
Post by artgirl1 on Mar 9, 2021 13:59:18 GMT
I don't think the issue of the title was as important to H&M as the fact that he did not get a title meant that he was not entitled to security protection. They kept stating that "because he was not getting a title, he would not get security'.
The firm managed to provide E & B security until they were adults.
As they expected Harry and Megan to be official working royals, why not provide security for Archie? Harry is still in the direct line from the queen, not just a niece/nephew /great niece/nephew. Archie would be more a target for security issues, then his cousins (except for WM children, but they probably have round the clock protection).
The BRF could auction off one of the tiaras, or Saudi gifts and pay for security for Archie's lifetime without a blink.
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on Mar 9, 2021 14:07:59 GMT
I don't think the issue of the title was as important to H&M as the fact that he did not get a title meant that he was not entitled to security protection. They kept stating that "because he was not getting a title, he would not get security'. The firm managed to provide E & B security until they were adults. As they expected Harry and Megan to be official working royals, why not provide security for Archie? Harry is still in the direct line from the queen, not just a niece/nephew /great niece/nephew. Archie would be more a target for security issues, then his cousins (except for WM children, but they probably have round the clock protection). The BRF could auction off one of the tiaras, or Saudi gifts and pay for security for Archie's lifetime without a blink. Or all the stolen artifacts they are in possession of
|
|
|
Post by mom on Mar 9, 2021 14:37:58 GMT
I don't think the issue of the title was as important to H&M as the fact that he did not get a title meant that he was not entitled to security protection. They kept stating that "because he was not getting a title, he would not get security'. The firm managed to provide E & B security until they were adults. As they expected Harry and Megan to be official working royals, why not provide security for Archie? Harry is still in the direct line from the queen, not just a niece/nephew /great niece/nephew. Archie would be more a target for security issues, then his cousins (except for WM children, but they probably have round the clock protection). The BRF could auction off one of the tiaras, or Saudi gifts and pay for security for Archie's lifetime without a blink. And if they had chosen to stay as officially working royals they all would have had security.
|
|
|
Post by artgirl1 on Mar 9, 2021 15:03:35 GMT
And if they had chosen to stay as officially working royals they all would have had security. Edward's children still get protection, Princess Michael of Kent and Princess Alexander, the Queens cousins get security. And Andrew gets security and he isn't a working royal. My understanding was that the security cut off at the Sussexes, and did not apply to Master Archie, even if his parents were working royals. Security coverage was ties to a title.
|
|
AmeliaBloomer
Drama Llama
Posts: 6,842
Location: USA
Jun 26, 2014 5:01:45 GMT
|
Post by AmeliaBloomer on Mar 9, 2021 15:41:00 GMT
I'm not calling anyone racist but it's a bit of a leap to go from someone in the royal ranks questioning how black Harry and Meghan's baby is going to be vs being a geneticist. Not sure why you dragged scientists into royal drama/gossip. That's quite the false equivalence. Agreed. Strongly. Beyond the odd geneticists argument (and now a research scientist weighing in to deny racism because of profession), I’m astonished that people are denying that conversations about biracial babies often CAN BE problematic and often are UNLIKE typical conjecture about eye color and family likeness. All? No. None? Again, no. So why are so many here fighting the possibility tooth and nail? In high school, my daughter’s two closest friends were biracial. These girls, and their parents, could tell you myriad stories about how their looks are dissected by others - skin color, hair texture, facial fixtures, body type. In other words, how Black they look. Or how white they look, from their Black relatives. Like all adolescents and teens, they just wanted to be like everybody else and not regularly put under a microscope physically. They were sensitive to these conversations and to tone and innuendo. My bet is Meghan is sensitive also, maybe sometimes hypersensitive, borne of a lifetime of examination that neither her husband nor white women on a message board people can understand, let alone categorically deny.
|
|
|
Post by christine58 on Mar 9, 2021 15:43:17 GMT
The important difference is Megan’s husband is standing by her side and doing all he can to protect his family. All this “she should have known” non Have not seen this addressed but did Harry DO anything to help her when she felt that life was not worth living anymore???
|
|
AmeliaBloomer
Drama Llama
Posts: 6,842
Location: USA
Jun 26, 2014 5:01:45 GMT
|
Post by AmeliaBloomer on Mar 9, 2021 15:44:01 GMT
Related to my post above (‘cause y’all should know by now that I’m both wordy and tangentie):
I live in a neighborhood that is two-thirds white and one-third Black. When I tell white people from the greater urban area where I live, I get a lot of, “Oh, is that area safe?” And “How’s the crime there?” My husband notices the frequency of the question to him, as do many neighbors and friends. Of note, I rarely-if-ever get that question from Black people. And I rarely-if-ever ask other people about crime in THEIR neighborhoods.
It’s weird. And it makes us suspicious about subtext. I would flat out not believe if all those questioners claimed that they only ask because “I read an article about the rising crime rates there...” yada, yada. I might believe some, but definitely not all. Doesn’t pass the sniff test when you’ve heard it enough.
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Mar 9, 2021 15:46:19 GMT
I don't think the issue of the title was as important to H&M as the fact that he did not get a title meant that he was not entitled to security protection. They kept stating that "because he was not getting a title, he would not get security'. The firm managed to provide E & B security until they were adults. As they expected Harry and Megan to be official working royals, why not provide security for Archie? Harry is still in the direct line from the queen, not just a niece/nephew /great niece/nephew. Archie would be more a target for security issues, then his cousins (except for WM children, but they probably have round the clock protection). The BRF could auction off one of the tiaras, or Saudi gifts and pay for security for Archie's lifetime without a blink. Or all the stolen artifacts they are in possession of The British Museum in London does have stolen artifacts, but I could not find any links showing that the British Royal Family has them. If you have a link showing that, please post it. eta - There is the Koh- I - Noor diamond on Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother's crown whose origins have been disputed. The British government claims it was obtained legally.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 17:20:48 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 9, 2021 15:53:22 GMT
I don't think the issue of the title was as important to H&M as the fact that he did not get a title meant that he was not entitled to security protection. They kept stating that "because he was not getting a title, he would not get security'. There's a lot of things in that interview that have been said and left to hang in mid-air for everyone out there to guess the rest of the story and the matter of Archie's security is one of them. If they were still living in this country I would bet my life on it that Archie would be given security whether he had a title or not. As the son of a former active soldier which fought in Afghanistan and happened to be a Royal, Archie would be a target. My guess is, at the time this was discussed maybe someone (she failed to mention who THEY were) would have said that it wasn't a given for every person in Archie's position( as the great grandchild of the Queen) to be given security. Neither Harry or Meghan said WHO told them this The security of the Royal Family is up to the family themselves, together with the Home Office and the Metropolitan Police Royal Protection Squad who assesses the risk, provides and oversees the security of all the Royals. So who were "They" the family? the Home Office? the Met? or was it a casual remark made by one of staff at the palace? As an aside Princess Eugenie and Princess Beatrice no longer have security paid for by the taxpayer it finished around 8 or 9 years ago when they left university when a financial review and a risk assessment was carried out by the Met.
|
|
|
Post by mom on Mar 9, 2021 16:08:31 GMT
I don't think the issue of the title was as important to H&M as the fact that he did not get a title meant that he was not entitled to security protection. They kept stating that "because he was not getting a title, he would not get security'. There's a lot of things in that interview that have been said and left to hang in mid-air for everyone out there to guess the rest of the story and the matter of Archie's security is one of them. If they were still living in this country I would bet my life on it that Archie would be given security whether he had a title or not. As the son of a former active soldier which fought in Afghanistan and happened to be a Royal, Archie would be a target. My guess is, at the time this was discussed maybe someone (she failed to mention who THEY were) would have said that it wasn't a given for every person in Archie's position( as the great grandchild of the Queen) to be given security. Neither Harry or Meghan said WHO told them this The security of the Royal Family is up to the family themselves, together with the Home Office and the Metropolitan Police Royal Protection Squad who assesses the risk, provides and oversees the security of all the Royals. So who were "They" the family? the Home Office? the Met? or was it a casual remark made by one of staff at the palace? As an aside Princess Eugenie and Princess Beatrice no longer have security paid for by the taxpayer it finished around 8 or 9 years ago when they left university when a financial review and a risk assessment was carried out by the Met. thank you for typing this post. Yes. I see the big problem with security is that H&M moved to America and are still expecting free security. And its not just any security, but specialized security. If they would have stayed in England, they would still be covered. Even if they weren't working Royals. Edit: can you imagine the headache of having to send security overseas, in a pandemic, so they could have round the clock security? The cost? The toll on the actual security?
|
|
|
Post by lisacharlotte on Mar 9, 2021 16:12:07 GMT
The important difference is Megan’s husband is standing by her side and doing all he can to protect his family. All this “she should have known” non Have not seen this addressed but did Harry DO anything to help her when she felt that life was not worth living anymore??? From the interview he said he was too embarrassed to tell anyone. Then they went to the event. Harry seems to be getting a lot of passes. Seriously, it’s not like royals haven’t declined to attend events due to unforeseen issues. Telling your husband you’re suicidal falls under that umbrella. WTF? Also, we don’t know the context or who said it, but considering Harry and Meghan have been vocal about the work he’s put in re: racism/feminism, why wasn’t that addressed with whomever said the comment? Seems like that’s where Harry shares his own journey to understanding with this racist family member. Instead they leave it open ended, effectively smearing the entire royal family with the comment of one person. In the current climate regarding race, I find it irresponsible.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 17:20:48 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 9, 2021 16:13:11 GMT
The important difference is Megan’s husband is standing by her side and doing all he can to protect his family. All this “she should have known” non Have not seen this addressed but did Harry DO anything to help her when she felt that life was not worth living anymore??? She didn't say did she and that is what I just cannot get my head round. With the connections Harry has through his close work over the last 6 years with mental health surely he had a friend that could have at least been an ear for her - sharing is caring isn't it? Those people could have also offered some advice as to how to deal with the situation. William has been very protective of Harry since their mother died even though he went through just the same amount of pain, why did |Harry not turn to him?
|
|
|
Post by Jennifer C on Mar 9, 2021 16:16:03 GMT
I don't know, I just see this whole nest of drama and it turns me off.
Princess Madeline of Sweden stopped being a SR and moved to America after getting married. I wish that PH and M would have looked and payed attention to the way she did it and followed. Granted, she wasn't dealing with racism, but she set a very nice standard for leaving a SR status. She didn't burn bridges.
Jennifer
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on Mar 9, 2021 16:23:53 GMT
Racism hurts. Losing your mom young. Weird interacial family dynamics etc all of that hurts. I don’t get why they can’t be shown grace. Even if you disagree with the choices the couple is making for their OWN lives mind you, none of us know intimately how those life experiences can impact you.
All the criticism regardless of whether or not it’s racist comes from a really petty judgement filled space.
|
|
|
Post by mom on Mar 9, 2021 16:24:54 GMT
Have not seen this addressed but did Harry DO anything to help her when she felt that life was not worth living anymore??? From the interview he said he was too embarrassed to tell anyone. Then they went to the event. Harry seems to be getting a lot of passes. Seriously, it’s not like royals haven’t declined to attend events due to unforeseen issues. Telling your husband you’re suicidal falls under that umbrella. WTF? Also, we don’t know the context or who said it, but considering Harry and Meghan have been vocal about the work he’s put in re: racism/feminism, why wasn’t that addressed with whomever said the comment? Seems like that’s where Harry shares his own journey to understanding with this racist family member. Instead they leave it open ended, effectively smearing the entire royal family with the comment of one person. In the current climate regarding race, I find it irresponsible. Yeah, I think Harry dropped the ball on this one. As her husband and soon to be dad, you ask for help. You just dont ignore it and hope it goes away. I just saw on Twitter that Buckingham Palace has asked Downing Street to help form a response.
|
|
|
Post by femalebusiness on Mar 9, 2021 16:27:19 GMT
I doubt there was a discussion when Kate was pregnant about the color or complexion of her child. They have similar hair and skin color. I know for sure it was brought up all through my pregnancies. I have dark olive skin and dark hair and dark eyes and my husband has curly red hair and freckles and green eyes. If I heard one conversation about wondering who the children would resemble, I heard 100. No one care beyond being curious. Almost any woman who is married to someone who is different from her in coloring or size has heard those comments. That was not true for me. I am a blue eyed blond, with the whitest skin on the planet. My husband is Mexican with beautiful brown skin. Not one person in my family or friends speculated how (dark) my daughter would be. It did occur to me because one of the reasons I wanted him as a father of my child was because I didn't want her to be stuck with my ucky white skin. However, if anyone was discussing her skin color they had enough sense not to say it to my face.
|
|
|
Post by pjaye on Mar 9, 2021 16:28:54 GMT
Beyond the odd geneticists argument (and now a research scientist weighing in to deny racism because of profession), I’m astonished that people are denying that conversations about biracial babies often CAN BE problematic and often are UNLIKE typical conjecture about eye color and family likeness. In my post I did say that for some people those conversations would be based in racism, but that it is simply not true for everyone. However I am specifically being called a racist because I said that my interest in genetics and how combinations of genes result in physical characteristics is fascinating and that when I think about those things there is no difference if I am wondering about eye colour, male pattern baldness or amounts of melanin in someone's skin. I was called a racist ass for that post. Therefore if the criteria for racism is simply an interest in genetics then every profession where people deal with genetic issues must therefore be racist as well. And people need to stop acting as if these conversations were had in front of Meghan while she was pregnant, Harry said "it was right at the start (of them dating)" and it was "what will the kids look like" I'm not defending that statement on it's own...but I am saying that people are acting as if these conversations were being had in front of Meghan while she was pregnant with Archie, and that's just not the case. Meghan only knows that Harry told her...his version, which may or may not be different from that was actually said. I agree that having a conversation like that in front of a pregnant woman in a work situation in most cases would be highly inappropriate - but it did not happen. On the other side of this I have read multiple posts on SM from people in mixed race relationships who have said their families did openly discuss this and in none of the ones I read did those people feel those comments were racist. All the Karen's here screaming racist at everyone need to get a grip and realize that they do not represent every person of colour. As for the rest of us, thinking about genetics and wondering how someone's baby will look (sex, eye colour, hair colour etc) in the privacy of our own homes - is a different scenario and for many of us, that interest in genes is not based in racism, and I will not be made to feel guilty about it.
|
|
|
Post by mrgiedrnkr on Mar 9, 2021 16:33:34 GMT
Isn’t there room for just not believing them? I was happy for them in the beginning. It I just don’t feel they have credibility. It makes me sad that because I don’t think they are credible, I may be considered racist.
|
|
used2scrap
Drama Llama
Posts: 6,097
Jan 29, 2016 3:02:55 GMT
|
Post by used2scrap on Mar 9, 2021 16:34:05 GMT
Racism hurts. Losing your mom young. Weird interacial family dynamics etc all of that hurts. I don’t get why they can’t be shown grace. Even if you disagree with the choices the couple is making for their OWN lives mind you, none of us know intimately how those life experiences can impact you. All the criticism regardless of whether or not it’s racist comes from a really petty judgement filled space. Sure. Conversely, if they don’t want to be judged, perhaps they shouldn’t be giving interviews with Oprah watched by millions while they partially detail intimate details of their lives and complain very publicly about their families. Someone earlier posted The Firm is their own worst enemy, but H&M seem to also be their own worst enemies.
|
|
|
Post by Chips on Mar 9, 2021 16:39:40 GMT
Meghan was absolutely subject to microaggressions and especially during her time with the BRF. This form of racism is thinly vailed a meant to be gaslighting. Microaggression is a term used for brief and commonplace daily verbal, behavioral or environmental indignities, whether intentional or unintentional, that communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative attitudes toward stigmatized or culturally marginalized groups.[1] The term was coined by Harvard University psychiatrist Chester M. Pierce in 1970 to describe insults and dismissals which he regularly witnessed non-black Americans inflicting on African Americans.[1][2][3][4] By the early 21st century, use of the term was applied to the casual degradation of any socially marginalized group, including LGBT people, people living in poverty, and people who are disabled.[5] Psychologist Derald Wing Sue defines microaggressions as "brief, everyday exchanges that send denigrating messages to certain individuals because of their group membership". The persons making the comments may be otherwise well-intentioned and unaware of the potential impact of their words www.apa.org/monitor/2009/02/microaggressionwww.npr.org/2020/06/08/872371063/microaggressions-are-a-big-deal-how-to-talk-them-out-and-when-to-walk-away
|
|
|
Post by sideways on Mar 9, 2021 16:40:43 GMT
Edit: can you imagine the headache of having to send security overseas, in a pandemic, so they could have round the clock security? The cost? The toll on the actual security? Because there are no resources for security in the USA?🙄
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 17:20:48 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 9, 2021 16:41:09 GMT
OT
Wouldn't it be something if there was a 13 page thread on the violence and brutality and dictatorship happening in Myanmar and its implications and repercussions on the safety of democracy writ large?
|
|
used2scrap
Drama Llama
Posts: 6,097
Jan 29, 2016 3:02:55 GMT
|
Post by used2scrap on Mar 9, 2021 16:43:48 GMT
Edit: can you imagine the headache of having to send security overseas, in a pandemic, so they could have round the clock security? The cost? The toll on the actual security? Because there are no resources for security in the USA?🙄 Who in the USA do you expect to be intimately privy to classified British intelligence regarding threats to the royal family that wouldn’t be a US government funded agency?
|
|
|
Post by sideways on Mar 9, 2021 16:47:20 GMT
Sure. Conversely, if they don’t want to be judged, perhaps they shouldn’t be giving interviews with Oprah watched by millions while they partially detail intimate details of their lives and complain very publicly about their families. Someone earlier posted The Firm is their own worst enemy, but H&M seem to also be their own worst enemies. OR, maybe, just MAYBE they were already judged and were sick of the scrutiny from the media and Joe/Jane Public having an opinion about every little thing they did or didn’t do and wanted to speak for themselves? I guess besides psychics and mind readers, we also have PR professionals on 2Peas.
|
|
used2scrap
Drama Llama
Posts: 6,097
Jan 29, 2016 3:02:55 GMT
|
Post by used2scrap on Mar 9, 2021 16:50:37 GMT
Sure. Conversely, if they don’t want to be judged, perhaps they shouldn’t be giving interviews with Oprah watched by millions while they partially detail intimate details of their lives and complain very publicly about their families. Someone earlier posted The Firm is their own worst enemy, but H&M seem to also be their own worst enemies. OR, maybe, just MAYBE they were already judged and were sick of the scrutiny from the media and Joe/Jane Public having an opinion about every little thing they did or didn’t do and wanted to speak for themselves? I guess besides psychics and mind readers, we also have PR professionals on 2Peas. The Oprah interview reduced their level of public scrutiny how exactly? I highly doubt Meghan’s father would be doing another round on the media circus right now if they hadn’t dragged it all out in public again. It doesn’t take a PR professional to realize how hard it is to try and control a narrative in the public sphere. Heck one can’t even control a thread on two peas; how often does the most seemingly benign post go off the rails? Edited to add: the tabloid media isn’t likely to rest until they identify who the overtly racist royal is.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 17:20:48 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 9, 2021 16:51:40 GMT
Have not seen this addressed but did Harry DO anything to help her when she felt that life was not worth living anymore??? From the interview he said he was too embarrassed to tell anyone. Then they went to the event. Harry seems to be getting a lot of passes. Seriously, it’s not like royals haven’t declined to attend events due to unforeseen issues. Telling your husband you’re suicidal falls under that umbrella. WTF? Also, we don’t know the context or who said it, but considering Harry and Meghan have been vocal about the work he’s put in re: racism/feminism, why wasn’t that addressed with whomever said the comment? Seems like that’s where Harry shares his own journey to understanding with this racist family member. Instead they leave it open ended, effectively smearing the entire royal family with the comment of one person. In the current climate regarding race, I find it irresponsible. Exactly. They've both left everyone to hang to dry and to gather as much speculation as possible which must be devastating for every member of that family, Royal or not, who are innocent in all of this. Both Harry and Megan have tarred every one of them with a racist brush. I don't think I could ever forgive them if I was innocent of what they have suggested.
|
|