|
Post by pixiechick on Nov 9, 2021 23:45:35 GMT
Absolutely no twisting. Remember in the debate when he was asked to tell white supremecists to stand down? He clearly told them to stand by and stand back, he refused to denounce them. I donât care what other statements he or his press secretaries made. Theyâre outweighed by his refusals to denounce them. When heâs asked a clear, direct, simple question and has an opportunity to denounce them, he refuses to do it. He undeniably refused to condemn them. âIâm not talking about the neo-Nazis and white nationalists because they should be condemned totally.â He denounced them.
|
|
|
Post by mollycoddle on Nov 9, 2021 23:47:54 GMT
Absolutely no twisting. Remember in the debate when he was asked to tell white supremecists to stand down? He clearly told them to stand by and stand back, he refused to denounce them. I donât care what other statements he or his press secretaries made. Theyâre outweighed by his refusals to denounce them. When heâs asked a clear, direct, simple question and has an opportunity to denounce them, he refuses to do it. He undeniably refused to condemn them. âIâm not talking about the neo-Nazis and white nationalists because they should be condemned totally.â He denounced them. I just find it so interesting that the âgoodâ protestors trying to protect Robert E Leeâs monument felt comfortable mixing with Neo-Nazis. I cannot imagine any âcauseâ that would make me protest with them. But thatâs me.I have a strange aversion to Nazis. Guess everyone is just different.đ
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Nov 9, 2021 23:50:27 GMT
âIâm not talking about the neo-Nazis and white nationalists because they should be condemned totally.â He denounced them. I just find it so interesting that the âgoodâ protestors trying to protect Robert E Leeâs monument felt comfortable mixing with Neo-Nazis. I cannot imagine any âcauseâ that would make me protest with them. But thatâs me.I have a strange aversion to Nazis. Guess everyone is just different.đ At least 38 times he disavowed and people are still trying to defy reality and say that he refuses to disavow and that Youngkin should condemn him for never disavowing racism and hate and apologize for him. It's irrational.
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Nov 9, 2021 23:51:53 GMT
|
|
|
Post by mollycoddle on Nov 9, 2021 23:54:19 GMT
I just find it so interesting that the âgoodâ protestors trying to protect Robert E Leeâs monument felt comfortable mixing with Neo-Nazis. I cannot imagine any âcauseâ that would make me protest with them. But thatâs me.I have a strange aversion to Nazis. Guess everyone is just different.đ At least 38 times he disavowed and people are still trying to defy reality and say that he refuses to disavow and that Youngkin should condemn him for never disavowing racism and hate and apologize for him. It's irrational. Oh, of course. Sure, sure, he did separate the Lee protestors from the Nazis. Now, some people might think that any group aligning itself to Nazis was problematic. But Trump gave them the benefit of the doubt, because he tries so very hard to be fair. đ
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Nov 10, 2021 1:17:01 GMT
Because heâs trying to have his cake and eat it too. No twisting necessary. Now matter how arduously you defend him, Gia, heâll never love you. You pretending to read his mind in order to claim he meant something other that the actual words he used, doesn't change the words, the meaning of them, or reality. You trying to do that is absolutely twisting. So it would seem you deemed it necessary. The only way the words he said mean something different than the words actual meaning is for you to pretend. My name is pixiechick. To call me someone else is rude. But to call me by someone's name that you've already successfully vilified only shows your desperate need to vilify. It reveals that you don't have enough faith in your twisting of reality. If you need to vilify ME you can do it by basing it on MY posts. Oh, Gia. You never disappoint. No one needs to read his mind. Heâs been quite clear on his view of white nationalists, both in his words and in his willingness to appoint them to high positions in the White House. time.com/5894497/donald-trump-white-supremacists-debate/
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Nov 10, 2021 1:28:09 GMT
You pretending to read his mind in order to claim he meant something other that the actual words he used, doesn't change the words, the meaning of them, or reality. You trying to do that is absolutely twisting. So it would seem you deemed it necessary. The only way the words he said mean something different than the words actual meaning is for you to pretend. My name is pixiechick. To call me someone else is rude. But to call me by someone's name that you've already successfully vilified only shows your desperate need to vilify. It reveals that you don't have enough faith in your twisting of reality. If you need to vilify ME you can do it by basing it on MY posts. Oh, Gia. You never disappoint. As does your need to rely on personal smears when you know your statements are nothing but hogwash.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Nov 10, 2021 1:55:15 GMT
In comparison, former said there were good people on both sides and never apologized for those comments. That's been debunked. Even by Politifact. His actual words: âExcuse me, they didnât put themselves down as neo-Nazis, and you had some very bad people in that group. But you also had people that were very fine people on both sides. You had people in that group â excuse me, excuse me, I saw the same pictures you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name.â âIâm not talking about the neo-Nazis and white nationalists because they should be condemned totally.ââRacism is evil, and those who cause violence in its name are criminals and thugs, including the KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and other hate groups that are repugnant to everything we hold dear as Americans.â
So, now that you know... stop spreading misinformation. I donât care about the number of times he read a statement prepared by someone else. Or the number of times he âdenouncedâ them. Moving those goal posts again.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 6:34:13 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2021 4:10:34 GMT
What was "fine" about people protesting the removal of a statue of a man who WAGED WAR AGAINST THE UNITED STATES!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
You can slice it up any way you want it - the "fine people" are nothing but a bunch of losers who worship other losers and traitors.
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Nov 10, 2021 4:41:54 GMT
I'm still waiting for any of the pea Republicans to speak out against Paul Gosar and say that he needs to be removed from Congress.... Crickets, not surprisingly. Theyâre quick to attack a Democrat who was indirectly involved and later condemned a political stunt to draw attention to Charlottesville. But silent when it comes to Gosar openly embracing white supremacy and issuing death threats against the president and members of Congress. Silence when MTG posted anti-Semitic comments. Silence when the former president through his actions and words supported white supremacy and on multiple occasions, refused to condemn it. They remain silent or in some cases, defend all of those politicians because they have an R after their name. Just as they were quick to condemn Cuomo but remain silent about Matt Gaetz. Anything goes if youâre a Republican but Democrats get held to a higher standard. The hypocrisy is unbelievable.
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Nov 10, 2021 4:52:56 GMT
Moving those goal posts again. Missing the forest for the trees again. And a convenient deflection from the overwhelming evidence that former ignored the rise and danger of white supremecists and refused to condemn them.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Nov 10, 2021 5:34:46 GMT
Moving those goal posts again. Missing the forest for the trees again. And a convenient deflection from the overwhelming evidence that former ignored the rise and danger of white supremecists and refused to condemn them. That's not deflection, that's responding on point to what YOU were talking about while also pointing out that you are unable to deal with being wrong. I notice you had to erase what I said in order to make your incorrect point. YOUR deflection statement wouldn't stand up to scrutiny if you had left my quotes in. Gosar openly embracing white supremacy and issuing death threats against the president and members of Congress. Silence when MTG posted anti-Semitic comments. Silence when the former president through his actions and words supported white supremacy and on multiple occasions, refused to condemn it. They remain silent or in some cases, defend all of those politicians because they have an R after their name. Just as they were quick to condemn Cuomo but remain silent about Matt Gaetz. Anything goes if youâre a Republican but Democrats get held to a higher standard. The hypocrisy is unbelievable. That is the epitome of deflection from the topic.^ The hypocrisy is unbelievable.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Nov 10, 2021 7:12:13 GMT
I'm not really concerned with what anyone CALLS it. That isn't really the issue. What stands out to me is what the students and teachers are experiencing from whatever you want to call it, that they are employing in schools: "hostile culture of conformity and fear that has taken hold of our school""schoolâs ideology requires students to see themselves not as individuals, but as representatives of a group, forcing them to adopt the status of privilege or victimhood""This is the dominant and divisive ideology that is guiding our adolescent students.""In my classroom, I see up close how this orthodoxy hinders studentsâ ability to read, write, and think."
"Students have internalized the message that this is the way we read and think about the world, and as a result, they fixate on power and group identity. This fixation has stunted their ability to observe and engage with the full fabric of human experience in our literature. In our school, the opportunity to hear competing ideas is practically non-existent.""How can students, who accept a single ideology as fact, learn to practice intellectual curiosity or humility or consider a competing idea theyâve never encountered?"" How can students develop higher order thinking if they are limited to seeing the world only through the lens of group identity and power?" "these students have found comfort in their moral certainty, and so they have become rigid and closed-minded, unable or unwilling to consider alternative perspectives.""Of course, not all students are true believers. Many pretend to agree because of pressure to conform." "Iâve heard from students who want to ask a question but stop for fear of offending someone. I have heard from students who donât participate in discussions for fear of being ostracized."
"One student did not want to develop her personal essay â about an experience she had in another country â for fear that it might mean that she was, without even realizing it, racist. In her fear, she actually stopped herself from thinking. This is the very definition of self-censorship."" the stifling conformity has only intensified. Last fall, two administrators informed faculty that certain viewpoints simply would not be tolerated during our new ârace explicitâ conversations with our new âanti-racistâ work. They said that no one would be allowed to question the orthodoxy regarding âsystemic racism.â The message was clear, and the faculty went silent in response."
" The reality is that fear pervades the faculty. On at least two separate occasions in 2017 and 2018, our Head of School, standing at the front of Hajjar Auditorium, told the entire faculty that he would fire us all if he could so that he could replace us all with people of color.""During a recent faculty meeting, teachers were segregated by skin color. Teachers who had light skin were placed into a âwhite caucusâ group and asked to ârememberâ that we are âWhiteâ and âto take responsibility for [our] power and privilege.â D-Eâs racial segregation of educators, aimed at leading us to rethink of ourselves as oppressors, was regressive and demeaning to us as individuals with our own moral compass and human agency." "DE claims that we teach students how to think, not what to think. But sadly, that is just no longer true." "I hope administrators and board members awaken in time to prevent this misguided and absolutist ideology from hollowing out D-E, as it has already hollowed out so many other institutions." Once again you put a lot of stuff out there but do not provide any actual proof what is being said is actually happening. People make all kinds of accusations but that doesnât mean what they are saying is actually happening. That is why itâs important that what these folks are claiming is verified by outside sources. Has this happened? In any of the examples you provided above? LINK If you want to click on their links and see for yourself.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Nov 10, 2021 11:36:40 GMT
Semantics. I know, you know, and Trump knows too, that there is no difference between white nationalists and people on the "keep Confederate statues from the Jim Crow era up in our town square" side of that debate. He wants to keep the support of the white nationalists but also disavow them. He undeniably differentiated them in his statement. No matter how you twist them, the words he used, clearly show that he is not calling white supremacists, white nationalists, or racists, "good people". He undeniably condemns them. Once again always the liar. Trump has NOT undeniably condemned them. He has elevated them and has so for a long long time. He riles them up, is supported by them financially uses them for his chaos and violence âproud boys stand byâ, encouraging them to storm the Capitol. Trump has legitimatized white supremacy, white nationalists, oath keepers, proud boys, good old boy racists, and has promoted the whites only movement all throughout his presidency. In fact he has done so more than any other political figure in the last several decades. You are so full of shit and your defense of him is pathetic.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Nov 10, 2021 11:39:35 GMT
Missing the forest for the trees again. And a convenient deflection from the overwhelming evidence that former ignored the rise and danger of white supremecists and refused to condemn them. That's not deflection, that's responding on point to what YOU were talking about while also pointing out that you are unable to deal with being wrong. I notice you had to erase what I said in order to make your incorrect point. YOUR deflection statement wouldn't stand up to scrutiny if you had left my quotes in. Gosar openly embracing white supremacy and issuing death threats against the president and members of Congress. Silence when MTG posted anti-Semitic comments. Silence when the former president through his actions and words supported white supremacy and on multiple occasions, refused to condemn it. They remain silent or in some cases, defend all of those politicians because they have an R after their name. Just as they were quick to condemn Cuomo but remain silent about Matt Gaetz. Anything goes if youâre a Republican but Democrats get held to a higher standard. The hypocrisy is unbelievable. That is the epitome of deflection from the topic.^ The hypocrisy is unbelievable. You being the biggest hypocrite here.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Nov 10, 2021 11:46:12 GMT
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Nov 10, 2021 12:20:26 GMT
You're trying to criticize McAuliffe for something he had no involvement with and condemned in strong terms. Lincoln Project was trying to draw attention to what happened in Charlottesville. The way they went about it was wrong and they accepted responsibility. In comparison, former said there were good people on both sides and never apologized for those comments. The Republicans have looked the other way and sometimes knowingly embraced white supremacy. Lincoln Project - âTodayâs demonstration was our way of reminding Virginians what happened in Charlottesville four years ago, the Republican Partyâs embrace of those values, and Glenn Youngkinâs failure to condemn it,â the Lincoln Project said in an unnamed statement. âWe will continue to hold Glenn Youngkin accountable. If he will denounce Trumpâs assertion that the Charlottesville rioters possessed âvery fineâ qualities, weâll withdraw the tiki torches. Until then, weâll be back.â Not deflecting. My point all along was that Republicans and former supported white supremacy. The comments he made regarding Charlottesville can be interpreted a lot of ways. If his statement was unclear and led to misunderstanding, thatâs on him. White supremecists and white nationalists certainly interpreted it as support. He had plenty of opportunities to denounce white supremacy and he refused to do so. He undeniably supports white supremacy. Statements written by other people do not change that fact. I will point out again that by focusing on one statement, you are ignoring the bigger picture. All of his statements and actions together supported white supremacy and led to the rise of white nationalism during his term in office. You completely ignored all of the evidence that I posted. The only evidence you have to support that he condemned white supremacy are 38 statements, many written by other people and some possibly misunderstood. Also, as others have have pointed out, you and other conservatives on this board have remained silent about the indefensible statements by Republicans. Thatâs not deflecting, itâs pointing out that your criticism of McAuliffe is very one sided and comes across as false because of your silence regarding statements and actions of Republicans.
|
|
|
Post by mollycoddle on Nov 10, 2021 12:44:00 GMT
I'm still waiting for any of the pea Republicans to speak out against Paul Gosar and say that he needs to be removed from Congress.... Crickets, not surprisingly. Theyâre quick to attack a Democrat who was indirectly involved and later condemned a political stunt to draw attention to Charlottesville. But silent when it comes to Gosar openly embracing white supremacy and issuing death threats against the president and members of Congress. Silence when MTG posted anti-Semitic comments. Silence when the former president through his actions and words supported white supremacy and on multiple occasions, refused to condemn it. They remain silent or in some cases, defend all of those politicians because they have an R after their name. Just as they were quick to condemn Cuomo but remain silent about Matt Gaetz. Anything goes if youâre a Republican but Democrats get held to a higher standard. The hypocrisy is unbelievable. And Jan 6th. They try to avoid talking about anything that casts them in a bad light. Jan 6th? Crickets. CRT? omg, our kids are being indoctrinated. Now Rufo dug out a resource on CRT from 2019, listed among a big list of other resources, to combat prejudice. It was not incorporated into Virginia Public Schools.. And Christopher Rufo has an agenda. A memo from a presentation in 2015 on the legal implications of school discipline, given by a professor from Florida, encouraged teachers to use cultural knowledge, prior experiences and performance styles as a means of shaping class discipline. Still was never incorporated into Virginia Public Schools. Christopher Rufo is a conservative who has appeared on Tucker Carlsonâs show, and who has been affiliated with Trump. And at the end of the day, CRT is not being taught in Virginia Public Schools. This is the GOP outrage machine churning up base anger at another imaginary issue.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Nov 10, 2021 13:11:48 GMT
Oh, Gia. You never disappoint. As does your need to rely on personal smears when you know your statements are nothing but hogwash. So youâre of the opinion that even though he hired Steve Bannon and Stephen Miller, you know whatâs really in his mind when he denounces white supremacists? Thereâs that old saying about actions speaking louder than words. I think youâd get more respect here if you admitted your previous usernames. Youâre not fooling anyone. Thatâs an action that speaks louder than words, too - your refusal to own all your history on this board.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 6:34:13 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2021 13:12:38 GMT
This is the GOP outrage machine churning up base anger at another imaginary issue. Because they thrive on anger and it works. It always has and it always will w/their lot. Rile 'em up over stupid false shit (remember the 'Death Panels' w/Obamacare?) and they'll turn out to vote against people who are trying to improve their lives and for people who will enact laws to stomp on their lives, happiness, jobs, peace. Works every time.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Nov 10, 2021 14:16:18 GMT
Abandoning the topic to lay out list of whatabouts is the very definition of deflection. The comments he made regarding Charlottesville can be interpreted a lot of ways. If his statement was unclear and led to misunderstanding, thatâs on him. No they can't. Words mean things. Pretending they mean something else and mindreading doesn't make it reality. If a certain type of person is bound and determined to "misinterpret" that's on them. Also, as others have have pointed out, you and other conservatives on this board have remained silent about the indefensible statements by Republicans. No I have not. You either just flat out lie or you just don't care to know the truth when you need to smear the right. This was a disgusting event by a bunch of dumbass thugs who lost their minds. If they ever even had one to begin with. It was completely wrong and NEVER should have happened.
LINK I personally commented 6 times on Jan 6. I think another commented 4 times.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Nov 10, 2021 14:22:25 GMT
I think youâd get more respect here if you admitted your previous usernames. Youâre not fooling anyone. Thatâs an action that speaks louder than words, too - your refusal to own all your history on this board. LINK to this post: That is not true, and almost as unhelpful as the OP. Posts like this potentially taint any new members in the minds of others, and that is completely unfair. No-one has the right to know if a new poster had a previous ID or if so what it was: each should be judged on their own merits.
|
|
|
Post by mollycoddle on Nov 10, 2021 14:31:25 GMT
Abandoning the topic to lay out list of whatabouts is the very definition of deflection. The comments he made regarding Charlottesville can be interpreted a lot of ways. If his statement was unclear and led to misunderstanding, thatâs on him. No they can't. Words mean things. Pretending they mean something else and mindreading doesn't make it reality. If a certain type of person is bound and determined to "misinterpret" that's on them. Also, as others have have pointed out, you and other conservatives on this board have remained silent about the indefensible statements by Republicans. No I have not. You either just flat out lie or you just don't care to know the truth when you need to smear the right. This was a disgusting event by a bunch of dumbass thugs who lost their minds. If they ever even had one to begin with. It was completely wrong and NEVER should have happened.
LINK I personally commented 6 times on Jan 6. I think another commented 4 times. Do I? Republicans are not interested in forming a bipartisan commission, saying-before anything had been done-that it would be partisan. And I was talking about Congressional Republicans, not you. I would have thought that was obvious. apnews.com/article/joe-biden-capitol-siege-bills-government-and-politics-68f90cb992a1cff1ff3f96009e44050eAnd McCarthy tried to appoint 2 clowns to the commission, one being Jim Jordan, who sadly represents a district in my state. But they really were not interested in getting to the bottom of what happened on January 6th. Why? www.npr.org/2021/05/26/999930573/why-a-9-11-commission-is-popular-but-may-not-happen-for-the-jan-6-capitol-attackEverybody lies except you, it seems. You are an honest broker trying to have a serious discussion, amirite? Now Rs say that there are already 2 Senate commissions looking into 1/6. That is true. Whatâs really interesting is that Republicans seem to like Congressional investigations when they are in charge of them. Remember Benghazi? www.politifact.com/factchecks/2015/oct/12/hillary-clinton/clinton-there-have-been-7-benghazi-probes-so-far/
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Nov 10, 2021 15:28:48 GMT
And I was talking about Congressional Republicans, not you. I would have thought that was obvious. When you're quoting and responding to people that specifically call out the "peas" for it, no it's not obvious you weren't also talking about the peas.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Nov 10, 2021 15:32:06 GMT
I think youâd get more respect here if you admitted your previous usernames. Youâre not fooling anyone. Thatâs an action that speaks louder than words, too - your refusal to own all your history on this board. LINK to this post: That is not true, and almost as unhelpful as the OP. Posts like this potentially taint any new members in the minds of others, and that is completely unfair. No-one has the right to know if a new poster had a previous ID or if so what it was: each should be judged on their own merits. And? I never said we had the right to know. I suggested that you'd get more respect if you admitted it yourself. Most of the people you like to argue with and denounce have been posting under the same usernames for over a decade. We own what we say, good and bad. Why are you too special to do that? It's actually pretty disrespectful to us, acting like we're too stupid to recognize your posting style after all these years. I notice that you didn't respond to my post about actions speaking louder than words. How does a president who "denouces" white supremacy select avowed white nationalists to be among his closest advisors? For that matter, how does a poster who tries to pass herself off as someone else have any credibility in a serious discussion?
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Nov 10, 2021 16:20:11 GMT
I never said we had the right to know. It's not about your rights. Posts like this potentially taint any new members in the minds of others, and that is completely unfair. No-one has the right to know if a new poster had a previous ID or if so what it was: each should be judged on their own merits. I suggested that you'd get more respect if you admitted it yourself. Everyone here with a functioning brain knows that isn't true. Doesn't matter who I was, that isn't the issue you have with me, it's the opinions and facts I give under the pixiechick name. So deal with those, that's all you get. If you don't have enough to discredit me or vilify me as pixiechick, that ought to tell you something. Because we all know that's what this is all about. You don't care how much respect I get here. You aren't fooling anyone. I couldn't care less if you respect me or not. You can interact with pixiechick or scroll on by. Doesn't bother me either way.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Nov 10, 2021 16:51:27 GMT
I never said we had the right to know. It's not about your rights. Posts like this potentially taint any new members in the minds of others, and that is completely unfair. No-one has the right to know if a new poster had a previous ID or if so what it was: each should be judged on their own merits. I suggested that you'd get more respect if you admitted it yourself. Everyone here with a functioning brain knows that isn't true. Doesn't matter who I was, that isn't the issue you have with me, it's the opinions and facts I give under the pixiechick name. So deal with those, that's all you get. If you don't have enough to discredit me or vilify me as pixiechick, that ought to tell you something. Because we all know that's what this is all about. You don't care how much respect I get here. You aren't fooling anyone. I couldn't care less if you respect me or not. You can interact with pixiechick or scroll on by. Doesn't bother me either way. Hon, if you are tainted, it's by your own words and actions. Continually jumping to the defense of a president who appointed white supremacists to White House positions is all we need to know about you. Doesn't matter which username you use. We know who you are and we know how you post and who you support. Nothing any poster here can do will "taint" you more than your own posts. I notice you're still ignoring the important parts of my post - how do you feel about Trump's appointing of Bannon and Miller as it relates to your assertion that he has denounced white supremacy.
|
|
|
Post by mollycoddle on Nov 10, 2021 17:38:02 GMT
I never said we had the right to know. It's not about your rights. Posts like this potentially taint any new members in the minds of others, and that is completely unfair. No-one has the right to know if a new poster had a previous ID or if so what it was: each should be judged on their own merits. I suggested that you'd get more respect if you admitted it yourself. Everyone here with a functioning brain knows that isn't true. Doesn't matter who I was, that isn't the issue you have with me, it's the opinions and facts I give under the pixiechick name. So deal with those, that's all you get. If you don't have enough to discredit me or vilify me as pixiechick, that ought to tell you something. Because we all know that's what this is all about. You don't care how much respect I get here. You aren't fooling anyone. I couldn't care less if you respect me or not. You can interact with pixiechick or scroll on by. Doesn't bother me either way. You know, Trump also refers to himself in the third person. Coincidence? đ€âșïž
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Nov 10, 2021 18:39:06 GMT
I'm not really concerned with what anyone CALLS it. That isn't really the issue. What stands out to me is what the students and teachers are experiencing from whatever you want to call it, that they are employing in schools: "hostile culture of conformity and fear that has taken hold of our school""schoolâs ideology requires students to see themselves not as individuals, but as representatives of a group, forcing them to adopt the status of privilege or victimhood""This is the dominant and divisive ideology that is guiding our adolescent students.""In my classroom, I see up close how this orthodoxy hinders studentsâ ability to read, write, and think."
"Students have internalized the message that this is the way we read and think about the world, and as a result, they fixate on power and group identity. This fixation has stunted their ability to observe and engage with the full fabric of human experience in our literature. In our school, the opportunity to hear competing ideas is practically non-existent.""How can students, who accept a single ideology as fact, learn to practice intellectual curiosity or humility or consider a competing idea theyâve never encountered?"" How can students develop higher order thinking if they are limited to seeing the world only through the lens of group identity and power?" "these students have found comfort in their moral certainty, and so they have become rigid and closed-minded, unable or unwilling to consider alternative perspectives.""Of course, not all students are true believers. Many pretend to agree because of pressure to conform." "Iâve heard from students who want to ask a question but stop for fear of offending someone. I have heard from students who donât participate in discussions for fear of being ostracized."
"One student did not want to develop her personal essay â about an experience she had in another country â for fear that it might mean that she was, without even realizing it, racist. In her fear, she actually stopped herself from thinking. This is the very definition of self-censorship."" the stifling conformity has only intensified. Last fall, two administrators informed faculty that certain viewpoints simply would not be tolerated during our new ârace explicitâ conversations with our new âanti-racistâ work. They said that no one would be allowed to question the orthodoxy regarding âsystemic racism.â The message was clear, and the faculty went silent in response."
" The reality is that fear pervades the faculty. On at least two separate occasions in 2017 and 2018, our Head of School, standing at the front of Hajjar Auditorium, told the entire faculty that he would fire us all if he could so that he could replace us all with people of color.""During a recent faculty meeting, teachers were segregated by skin color. Teachers who had light skin were placed into a âwhite caucusâ group and asked to ârememberâ that we are âWhiteâ and âto take responsibility for [our] power and privilege.â D-Eâs racial segregation of educators, aimed at leading us to rethink of ourselves as oppressors, was regressive and demeaning to us as individuals with our own moral compass and human agency." "DE claims that we teach students how to think, not what to think. But sadly, that is just no longer true." "I hope administrators and board members awaken in time to prevent this misguided and absolutist ideology from hollowing out D-E, as it has already hollowed out so many other institutions." Once again you put a lot of stuff out there but do not provide any actual proof what is being said is actually happening. People make all kinds of accusations but that doesnât mean what they are saying is actually happening. That is why itâs important that what these folks are claiming is verified by outside sources. Has this happened? In any of the examples you provided above? LINK If you want to click on their links and see for yourself.
|
|
|
Post by onelasttime on Nov 10, 2021 19:11:54 GMT
Once again you put a lot of stuff out there but do not provide any actual proof what is being said is actually happening. People make all kinds of accusations but that doesnât mean what they are saying is actually happening. That is why itâs important that what these folks are claiming is verified by outside sources. Has this happened? In any of the examples you provided above? LINK If you want to click on their links and see for yourself. Well itâs nice that you provided a link but is it for all your âexamplesâ you posted earlier or is this new? As far as actually teaching CRT in these schools Iâm wondering if what they are actually teaching CRT or history and calling it CRT. I read a little of what CRT is about and some of it I though well duh. Personally I think it better suited to be taught in college and actual history be taught in high school. The good, the bad, & the ugly with the hopes that those that come behind us will learn from the mistakes and do a better job. But if they are teaching actual CRT in high school then Iâm good with it.
|
|