|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Feb 21, 2022 21:41:40 GMT
Does anyone know what corporation this is? “ Say the people supporting the corporation responsible for killing tens of millions of minority children.” I’m guessing it’s Amazon.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Feb 21, 2022 21:42:33 GMT
Your manner of speaking is gross and I'm not sure you even realize it. Do you speak to people in real life like that? You're drinking the Kool Aid that the media is providing you with and again, are completely oblivious. You've just learned about Diagolon through a well crafted online news article. A group of boys with guns and a flag. Now you think they're terrorists. If I wasn't Canadian and didn't already know who these guys were, I might think the same thing. I'm not here to change your mind because at this point I realize who I'm dealing with and that it's not possible. Critical thinking is not your forte. Fine. You don't have the time or the energy or the will to get to the bottom of things. It's not easy. I get it. But you're talking about something you know nothing about other than a news article and are trying to sound superior with vulgar language and 2 second Googling skills. It's honestly humourous. Please keep it up because at this point it's enjoyable. Next you'll be telling me that I'm a white supremacist. Your type falls for this sort of thing so easily. It's thoroughly predictable. Bwaashahahaaaaa!!! Such brainwashy drivel 🤣🤣🤣
|
|
|
Post by elaine on Feb 21, 2022 21:50:45 GMT
What? You don't like your concerns to be oversimplified? Hmmm. Our bodies, our choice? Hmmm. You have to look into the history and lives of the founders and leaders of your movement? Hmmm. You want the freedom to take the life of your own unborn, and sometimes newborn, but you don't want others to have the freedom of choice to prefer to treat a possible viral infection with long-used, effective, and generically cheap therapeutics instead of having their entire families continually injected with experimental vaccines that aren't stopping infection and are yielding bumper profits for big pharmaceutical companies. But... WHITE SUPREMACY! Say the people supporting the corporation responsible for killing tens of millions of minority children. The true arrogance of white privilege on full display. If this is aimed at me, try and have enough spine to tag me or to reply directly. I like to know when you crawl out of your hole again so I can give your Trumpian word salad of meaningless bullshit the big "fuck you" it deserves. You need to step away from the conspiracy sites, stop salivating over live feeds from people giving you only the POV you prefer, and get back out in the world. Aren't your children ashamed of you by now? Well, I know that the “White Supremacy” thing was aimed at me. But, anyone who supports white supremacists when they take over a city is a white supremacist in my book, so I can live with that. 🤷♀️ I do find a white supremacist supporter accusing others of white privilege to be ironic at best and simply pathetic otherwise.
|
|
twinsmomfla99
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,118
Jun 26, 2014 13:42:47 GMT
|
Post by twinsmomfla99 on Feb 21, 2022 21:53:59 GMT
These protestors think they are being oppressed, but they are not. I agree with this guy.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 3:47:16 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 21, 2022 22:47:39 GMT
A fetus is not a decision making body. Neither is a person in a coma. That has NOTHING to do with it, imo. Whether the person is capable of making decision or not NO ONE has the right to USE THE BODY, blood, bone marrow of another person. NO ONE.
|
|
|
Post by bc2ca on Feb 21, 2022 23:12:47 GMT
This actually made me laugh. "Diagolon" is a fictional flag not an extremist group. The government is reaching so hard to find a culprit here that they're now fabricating them. You're drinking the Kool Aid that the media is providing you with and again, are completely oblivious. You've just learned about Diagolon through a well crafted online news article. A group of boys with guns and a flag. Now you think they're terrorists. If I wasn't Canadian and didn't already know who these guys were, I might think the same thing. I'm not here to change your mind because at this point I realize who I'm dealing with and that it's not possible. Critical thinking is not your forte. Fine. You don't have the time or the energy or the will to get to the bottom of things. It's not easy. I get it. But you're talking about something you know nothing about other than a news article and are trying to sound superior with vulgar language and 2 second Googling skills. It's honestly humourous. Please keep it up because at this point it's enjoyable. So which is it? A fictional flag or a group of boys with guns and a flag? Are boys allowed to own guns in Canada? My critical thinking goes on high alert when someone refers to a group of heavily armed men as "boys with guns". On one hand you tell people to google information and on the other you are denigrating their sources. Knowing the Canadian Anti-Hate Network (CAHN) has identified Diagolon as a hate group, specifically as an accelerationist group, is enough for me to know who they are.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Feb 21, 2022 23:14:29 GMT
A fetus is not a decision making body. Neither is a person in a coma. That has NOTHING to do with it, imo. Whether the person is capable of making decision or not NO ONE has the right to USE THE BODY, blood, bone marrow of another person. NO ONE. Ok. Although, Someone (else) is making medical decisions for the person in a coma…
|
|
|
Post by LiLi on Feb 21, 2022 23:57:03 GMT
You want the freedom to take the life of your own unborn, and sometimes even newborn Saying something like that shows your true character. I see you.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Feb 22, 2022 0:06:17 GMT
These protestors think they are being oppressed, but they are not. I agree with this guy. Love it. He and Trae Crowder should do a show together.
|
|
|
Post by sideways on Feb 22, 2022 0:44:01 GMT
Oh please. Look no further than a conservative trying to compare abortion—a legal healthcare option for women—to a pandemic. Me wanting to abort a fetus only affects ME. Not you, not my community, not my state, not my government. And pandemic, not the same. But you already know that. (Or are you just really dumb?) You’re only permitted to push those echo chamber republican fear mongering talking points. I hate to point out the obvious here but it also affects the fetus. If you would have preferred to be the result of an abortion then I could see how you would agree with it, otherwise you're a hypocrite. Your abortion isn’t contagious. One pregnant person can’t catch abortion from another. Do you REALLY need this explained to you?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 3:47:16 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2022 1:19:01 GMT
Ok. Although, Someone (else) is making medical decisions for the person in a coma… And the forced-gestation and forced-labor crowd will argue that someone (i.e., the state, the dad, etc) could be making medical decisions for the fetus.
And my argument remains the same. I don't care if the embryo is a "human" or a "person" or "decision making". NO HUMAN and NO PERSON whether infant or toddler or child or teen or adult or elderly person has the right to use MY BLOOD or MY BONE MARROW or MY ORGANS w/o my continued permission. Same with a pregnant woman and her blood, marrow, organs.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Feb 22, 2022 2:44:21 GMT
Show us where someone on the right here posted "undeniable proof" and was uniformly rebuffed by the left. I don't know if she did, but I will... Here's just one recent of endless examples... This thread. Page 29, 14th post down. My post. In response to sideways saying "TFG had no plan whatsoever to get vaccines into arms. None. Zero. Zilch." 21 down. My post. 24 down. My post. 26 down. My post. 28 down. My post. And one specifically involving YOU merge. A thread I started to try to spread goodwill and pay it forward, in hopes that it would have a nice effect on some people going through a rough time in the service industry. People were appreciating it and adding their own experiences of how rough the service industry is having it lately. Even Lucy appreciated it. Lucy: "Thank you. I cannot find a single thing there to disagree with. " Merge: Hold my beer.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Feb 22, 2022 3:46:54 GMT
I don't know if she did, but I will... Here's just one recent of endless examples... This thread. Page 29, 14th post down. My post. In response to sideways saying "TFG had no plan whatsoever to get vaccines into arms. None. Zero. Zilch." 21 down. My post. 24 down. My post. 26 down. My post. 28 down. My post. And one specifically involving YOU merge. A thread I started to try to spread goodwill and pay it forward, in hopes that it would have a nice effect on some people going through a rough time in the service industry. People were appreciating it and adding their own experiences of how rough the service industry is having it lately. Even Lucy appreciated it. Lucy: "Thank you. I cannot find a single thing there to disagree with. " Merge: Hold my beer. You’re being insidious—disingenuous. Again. Where did merge’s original quote come from? You’re the OP in the thread in which you pulled a snippet/sentence from merge that she posted on ANOTHER thread. Merge wasn’t responding to or quoting you in this thread that you started.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 3:47:16 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2022 8:24:39 GMT
It is hard to keep up with these threads so thought I might post this in both threads as they now seem to be over lapping. I notice that some of the conversation has turned to vaccine effectiveness amongst all the other tangents. It is all a learning curve , for me anyway. It is not unlike a situation where I have found myself in before. I used to think that science was absolute but I found that the devil is in the detail . ( I learned this whilst home - researching a post viral health condition over many years ) There are shades of grey I have only taken a quick glance at vaccine effectiveness but if I were to take a more serious look ( which I am not ) then I would take the following factors into consideration - Epidemiological data from various countries . Comparison of above data and why variations may occur - In an earlier post I linked to data including tables that showed 2 shot vaccine effectiveness in the UK was lower than that reported by the US . The UKHSA ( UK Health Security Agency )showed roughly 40% ish effectiveness compared to 60% ish from the CDC. ( US Centre for Disease Control ) A potential reason for this could be because the UK used both Astra Zeneca and Pfizer ( confirmed ) in comparison to the US which used Moderna and Pfizer ( at least I think so but have not double checked ) Other things to take into consideration might be - Different vaccine types Timescales of waning immunity Number and timing of shots . Covid variants as vaccine efficacy for Delta was higher than for Omicron. Immunosuppressed individuals Rates of infection for different areas . Through previous personal experience of home research there a few things I picked up along the way including - Taking into consideration the ranking of a journal. Some are more respected and high profile than others. They are rated regarding their impact factor. Even high ranking journals sometimes have a controversial history on certain subjects. I also came to realise that any meta analysis is only as good as the original articles which reviewers may take at face value. If the original articles were unreliable or biased in the first place than the conclusion of any meta analysis may reflect this and could be potentially flawed leading to misleading conclusions . Decent meta analysis should highlight any weaknesses and issues concerned. In my experience this can vary. The devil in the detail is to be found in between the abstract and the conclusion of the article. There have been times when headers don’t always stand up to closer scrutiny. Going off topic slightly - The type of misleading research that I am most familiar with has thankfully since been discredited due it’s poor practices . Unfortunately the same discredited researchers have turned their attention to Long Covid. I have huge respect for the patients/ families (affected by this particular post viral illness )- dubbed as citizen scientists who have collaborated with decent medical/scientific researchers to co-author papers in order to get them published in peer reviewed journals . Amongst other researchers, they have contributed to altering particular Health guidelines in the UK and elsewhere. The new guidelines have turned the old ones upside down. This could also influence Long Covid health guidelines in the future due to their similarity. As a non-scientist I have come across information ( post viral ) that I found difficult to understand and wanted to learn more about clinical findings . As such I contacted a few biomedical researchers to ask if they could help explain things. I have been so lucky because they took the time and trouble to help. Going back to Covid , things are emerging and constantly changing medically, scientifically and politically. Information is fast moving and often contradictory . Online abuse is rife. Hate speech / crimes online have increased. I am from the UK but I read that New Zealand has a campaign to encourage people to stop and think before they press send. They try to show people that disagreement can occur and strong views expressed without resorting to personal attacks. Winding back online rage. www.theguardian.com/world/2022/feb/11/what-would-your-mother-say-new-zealand-urges-citizens-to-wind-back-online-rageI might just hide under the duvet now !
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 3:47:16 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2022 10:22:50 GMT
An extract from the Guardian piece - Just editing to add , this problem is not unique to New Zealand and is happening in many different countries. I feel that some parallels can be drawn to these threads.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Feb 22, 2022 11:37:56 GMT
It is hard to keep up with these threads so thought I might post this in both threads as they now seem to be over lapping. I notice that some of the conversation has turned to vaccine effectiveness amongst all the other tangents. It is all a learning curve , for me anyway. It is not unlike a situation where I have found myself in before. I used to think that science was absolute but I found that the devil is in the detail . ( I learned this whilst home - researching a post viral health condition over many years ) There are shades of grey I have only taken a quick glance at vaccine effectiveness but if I were to take a more serious look ( which I am not ) then I would take the following factors into consideration - Epidemiological data from various countries . Comparison of above data and why variations may occur - In an earlier post I linked to data including tables that showed 2 shot vaccine effectiveness in the UK was lower than that reported by the US . The UKHSA ( UK Health Security Agency )showed roughly 40% ish effectiveness compared to 60% ish from the CDC. ( US Centre for Disease Control ) A potential reason for this could be because the UK used both Astra Zeneca and Pfizer ( confirmed ) in comparison to the US which used Moderna and Pfizer ( at least I think so but have not double checked ) Other things to take into consideration might be - Different vaccine types Timescales of waning immunity Number and timing of shots . Covid variants as vaccine efficacy for Delta was higher than for Omicron. Immunosuppressed individuals Rates of infection for different areas . Through previous personal experience of home research there a few things I picked up along the way including - Taking into consideration the ranking of a journal. Some are more respected and high profile than others. They are rated regarding their impact factor. Even high ranking journals sometimes have a controversial history on certain subjects. I also came to realise that any meta analysis is only as good as the original articles which reviewers may take at face value. If the original articles were unreliable or biased in the first place than the conclusion of any meta analysis may reflect this and could be potentially flawed leading to misleading conclusions . Decent meta analysis should highlight any weaknesses and issues concerned. In my experience this can vary. The devil in the detail is to be found in between the abstract and the conclusion of the article. There have been times when headers don’t always stand up to closer scrutiny. Going off topic slightly - The type of misleading research that I am most familiar with has thankfully since been discredited due it’s poor practices . Unfortunately the same discredited researchers have turned their attention to Long Covid. I have huge respect for the patients/ families (affected by this particular post viral illness )- dubbed as citizen scientists who have collaborated with decent medical/scientific researchers to co-author papers in order to get them published in peer reviewed journals . Amongst other researchers, they have contributed to altering particular Health guidelines in the UK and elsewhere. The new guidelines have turned the old ones upside down. This could also influence Long Covid health guidelines in the future due to their similarity. As a non-scientist I have come across information ( post viral ) that I found difficult to understand and wanted to learn more about clinical findings . As such I contacted a few biomedical researchers to ask if they could help explain things. I have been so lucky because they took the time and trouble to help. Going back to Covid , things are emerging and constantly changing medically, scientifically and politically. Information is fast moving and often contradictory . Online abuse is rife. Hate speech / crimes online have increased. I am from the UK but I read that New Zealand has a campaign to encourage people to stop and think before they press send. They try to show people that disagreement can occur and strong views expressed without resorting to personal attacks. Winding back online rage. www.theguardian.com/world/2022/feb/11/what-would-your-mother-say-new-zealand-urges-citizens-to-wind-back-online-rageI might just hide under the duvet now ! Doing “home research” where you’re comparing subsets of data, related or not is dicey at best, and then to combine that data from disparate studies can and usually does produce misleading or unreliable results. While science is “fluid”, ever evolving, updating —no amount of “home study or personal research/compilation of data is going to be accurate for the masses.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Feb 22, 2022 11:54:20 GMT
I don't know if she did, but I will... Here's just one recent of endless examples... This thread. Page 29, 14th post down. My post. In response to sideways saying "TFG had no plan whatsoever to get vaccines into arms. None. Zero. Zilch." 21 down. My post. 24 down. My post. 26 down. My post. 28 down. My post. And one specifically involving YOU merge. A thread I started to try to spread goodwill and pay it forward, in hopes that it would have a nice effect on some people going through a rough time in the service industry. People were appreciating it and adding their own experiences of how rough the service industry is having it lately. Even Lucy appreciated it. Lucy: "Thank you. I cannot find a single thing there to disagree with. " Merge: Hold my beer. I’m not going up to count responses to find whatever you’re talking about, but the question was about undeniable proof. Not places where people simply disagreed with you. I disagreed with you lecturing anyone about kindness on that thread and I very clearly explained why. And I stand by it.
|
|
twinsmomfla99
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,118
Jun 26, 2014 13:42:47 GMT
|
Post by twinsmomfla99 on Feb 22, 2022 12:00:42 GMT
These protestors think they are being oppressed, but they are not. I agree with this guy. Love it. He and Trae Crowder should do a show together. Yes, I think he is the Canadian version of Trae (or Trae is the American version of him).
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Feb 22, 2022 12:07:29 GMT
And one specifically involving YOU merge. A thread I started to try to spread goodwill and pay it forward, in hopes that it would have a nice effect on some people going through a rough time in the service industry. People were appreciating it and adding their own experiences of how rough the service industry is having it lately. Even Lucy appreciated it. Lucy: "Thank you. I cannot find a single thing there to disagree with. " Merge: Hold my beer. You’re being insidious—disingenuous. Again. Where did merge’s original quote come from? You’re the OP in the thread in which you pulled a snippet/sentence from merge that she posted on ANOTHER thread. Merge wasn’t responding to or quoting you in this thread that you started. So what? Including what made me think of it, in no way minimizes what I said.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Feb 22, 2022 12:17:43 GMT
And one specifically involving YOU merge. A thread I started to try to spread goodwill and pay it forward, in hopes that it would have a nice effect on some people going through a rough time in the service industry. People were appreciating it and adding their own experiences of how rough the service industry is having it lately. Even Lucy appreciated it. Lucy: "Thank you. I cannot find a single thing there to disagree with. " Merge: Hold my beer. I’m not going up to count responses to find whatever you’re talking about, but the question was about undeniable proof. Not places where people simply disagreed with you. I disagreed with you lecturing anyone about kindness on that thread and I very clearly explained why. And I stand by it. I posted a thread in order to pay it forward and create good will. A thread that people were appreciating. YOU were the one lecturing in order to diminish anything I say. but the question was about undeniable proof. I gave undeniable proof - my posts on page 29 of this thread. You don't have to count anything.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Feb 22, 2022 12:28:09 GMT
It is hard to keep up with these threads so thought I might post this in both threads as they now seem to be over lapping. I notice that some of the conversation has turned to vaccine effectiveness amongst all the other tangents. It is all a learning curve , for me anyway. It is not unlike a situation where I have found myself in before. I used to think that science was absolute but I found that the devil is in the detail . ( I learned this whilst home - researching a post viral health condition over many years ) There are shades of grey I have only taken a quick glance at vaccine effectiveness but if I were to take a more serious look ( which I am not ) then I would take the following factors into consideration - Epidemiological data from various countries . Comparison of above data and why variations may occur - In an earlier post I linked to data including tables that showed 2 shot vaccine effectiveness in the UK was lower than that reported by the US . The UKHSA ( UK Health Security Agency )showed roughly 40% ish effectiveness compared to 60% ish from the CDC. ( US Centre for Disease Control ) A potential reason for this could be because the UK used both Astra Zeneca and Pfizer ( confirmed ) in comparison to the US which used Moderna and Pfizer ( at least I think so but have not double checked ) Other things to take into consideration might be - Different vaccine types Timescales of waning immunity Number and timing of shots . Covid variants as vaccine efficacy for Delta was higher than for Omicron. Immunosuppressed individuals Rates of infection for different areas . Through previous personal experience of home research there a few things I picked up along the way including - Taking into consideration the ranking of a journal. Some are more respected and high profile than others. They are rated regarding their impact factor. Even high ranking journals sometimes have a controversial history on certain subjects. I also came to realise that any meta analysis is only as good as the original articles which reviewers may take at face value. If the original articles were unreliable or biased in the first place than the conclusion of any meta analysis may reflect this and could be potentially flawed leading to misleading conclusions . Decent meta analysis should highlight any weaknesses and issues concerned. In my experience this can vary. The devil in the detail is to be found in between the abstract and the conclusion of the article. There have been times when headers don’t always stand up to closer scrutiny. Going off topic slightly - The type of misleading research that I am most familiar with has thankfully since been discredited due it’s poor practices . Unfortunately the same discredited researchers have turned their attention to Long Covid. I have huge respect for the patients/ families (affected by this particular post viral illness )- dubbed as citizen scientists who have collaborated with decent medical/scientific researchers to co-author papers in order to get them published in peer reviewed journals . Amongst other researchers, they have contributed to altering particular Health guidelines in the UK and elsewhere. The new guidelines have turned the old ones upside down. This could also influence Long Covid health guidelines in the future due to their similarity. As a non-scientist I have come across information ( post viral ) that I found difficult to understand and wanted to learn more about clinical findings . As such I contacted a few biomedical researchers to ask if they could help explain things. I have been so lucky because they took the time and trouble to help. Going back to Covid , things are emerging and constantly changing medically, scientifically and politically. Information is fast moving and often contradictory . Online abuse is rife. Hate speech / crimes online have increased. I am from the UK but I read that New Zealand has a campaign to encourage people to stop and think before they press send. They try to show people that disagreement can occur and strong views expressed without resorting to personal attacks. Winding back online rage. www.theguardian.com/world/2022/feb/11/what-would-your-mother-say-new-zealand-urges-citizens-to-wind-back-online-rageI might just hide under the duvet now ! Doing “home research” where you’re comparing subsets of data, related or not is dicey at best, and then to combine that data from disparate studies can and usually does produce misleading or unreliable results. While science is “fluid”, ever evolving, updating —no amount of “home study or personal research/compilation of data is going to be accurate for the masses. no amount of “home study or personal research/compilation of data is going to be accurate for the masses. Neither is across the board, no exceptions, mass mandated medical treatment. Especially given the new science and most recent information that has come out about who is most and least at risk. And the new science about the effectiveness of natural immunity. Home study, personal research/compilation of data, along with discussing with your own doctor IS going to be accurate for your personal decisions.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Feb 22, 2022 12:49:15 GMT
I’m not going up to count responses to find whatever you’re talking about, but the question was about undeniable proof. Not places where people simply disagreed with you. I disagreed with you lecturing anyone about kindness on that thread and I very clearly explained why. And I stand by it. I posted a thread in order to pay it forward and create good will. A thread that people were appreciating. YOU were the one lecturing in order to diminish anything I say. but the question was about undeniable proof. I gave undeniable proof - my posts on page 29 of this thread. You don't have to count anything. I use Tapatalk. There are no “pages.” And as I said in the other thread, “good will” is an insult when you consistently vote for, defend, and support people whose policies hurt the people to whom you’re supposedly giving good will. Your thread was an insult to all of them/us, but instead of reflecting on that, you choose to see yourself as a victim. How very typical.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Feb 22, 2022 13:02:38 GMT
I posted a thread in order to pay it forward and create good will. A thread that people were appreciating. YOU were the one lecturing in order to diminish anything I say. I gave undeniable proof - my posts on page 29 of this thread. You don't have to count anything. I use Tapatalk. There are no “pages.” And as I said in the other thread, “good will” is an insult when you consistently vote for, defend, and support people whose policies hurt the people to whom you’re giving good will. Your thread was an insult to all of them/us. Well look at it off of Tapatalk. Or ask for proof and continue to find asinine ways to dismiss the proof without even looking at it. That's fine, it's just more proof. As far as my thread being an insult, it is only if you want to twist it into that. And you clearly NEEDED to. It's almost pathological with you these days. Plenty of people didn't see it as an insult and appreciated the thread.
|
|
|
Post by cindosha on Feb 22, 2022 13:39:43 GMT
If this is aimed at me, try and have enough spine to tag me or to reply directly. I like to know when you crawl out of your hole again so I can give your Trumpian word salad of meaningless bullshit the big "fuck you" it deserves. You need to step away from the conspiracy sites, stop salivating over live feeds from people giving you only the POV you prefer, and get back out in the world. Aren't your children ashamed of you by now? Well, I know that the “White Supremacy” thing was aimed at me. But, anyone who supports white supremacists when they take over a city is a white supremacist in my book, so I can live with that. 🤷♀️ I do find a white supremacist supporter accusing others of white privilege to be ironic at best and simply pathetic otherwise. I always love when someone doesn't have a good response to someone's point and here comes the "white privilege" or "you are a white supremacist" rants. It has happened SEVERAL times on this thread. I do find a white supremacist supporter accusing others of white privilege to be ironic at best and simply pathetic otherwise.Don't you have a better argument than that? Its really getting repetitive and boring. And laughable at this point in time.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Feb 22, 2022 13:41:57 GMT
I use Tapatalk. There are no “pages.” And as I said in the other thread, “good will” is an insult when you consistently vote for, defend, and support people whose policies hurt the people to whom you’re giving good will. Your thread was an insult to all of them/us. Well look at it off of Tapatalk. Or ask for proof and continue to find asinine ways to dismiss the proof without even looking at it. That's fine, it's just more proof. As far as my thread being an insult, it is only if you want to twist it into that. And you clearly NEEDED to. It's almost pathological with you these days. Plenty of people didn't see it as an insult and appreciated the thread. Funny thing about insults. You don’t get to decide whether or not the other person feels insulted. You don’t get to make yourself the victim when you’ve insulted someone else. Now if you’ll excuse me, I’m off to teach some divisive concepts, like understanding how the music of African slaves is the root of all the music we enjoy today. LMK if you need more deets so you can report me.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Feb 22, 2022 14:04:31 GMT
Well look at it off of Tapatalk. Or ask for proof and continue to find asinine ways to dismiss the proof without even looking at it. That's fine, it's just more proof. As far as my thread being an insult, it is only if you want to twist it into that. And you clearly NEEDED to. It's almost pathological with you these days. Plenty of people didn't see it as an insult and appreciated the thread. Funny thing about insults. You don’t get to decide whether or not the other person feels insulted. You don’t get to make yourself the victim when you’ve insulted someone else. Now if you’ll excuse me, I’m off to teach some divisive concepts, like understanding how the music of African slaves is the root of all the music we enjoy today. LMK if you need more deets so you can report me. Nothing I said in that thread was insulting without twisting yourself into being offended. So, what you're saying is, you didn't REALLY want to see proof, you were just using that as another asinine way to dismiss. Just like you twisting yourself into an offended pretzel on my thread in order to diminish anything I say. Got it.
|
|
|
Post by cindosha on Feb 22, 2022 14:23:25 GMT
These protestors think they are being oppressed, but they are not. I agree with this guy. The protesters and everyone else I know, want the mandates ended. We want to go where we want, when we want, without restriction. The mask mandates as well as the vaccines have been proven to not be as effective as the drug companies thought they would be. EVERYONE is getting some form of covid whether you wear 6 masks or none, if you have been quadruple boosted or not. If you want to continue to wear a mask, by all means, do so. We now know that the overwhelming number of deaths, over 75%, occurred in people who had at least four comorbidities, so really these are people who were sick to begin with. We also know that the vaccine does not prevent you from getting covid and that you can get it from someone who is vaxed, boosted and masked, even if YOU are vaxed, boosted and masked. We also know that children are suffering in school because of this pandemic and that many are now far behind their learning because of virtual schooling. We know that the vast majority of people do not follow the mask mandates anyway, (super bowl and other very large sporting events, concerts, politicians not wearing masks at events, pro mask people being found on social medial without masks on, etc). We also know that a little piece of plexiglass in front of you at a register in a store does NOTHING to stop the airborne droplets from going over, under or around that little piece of plexiglass. That's just common logic FFS. At this point, we need to learn how to live with this virus and get on with life.
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Feb 22, 2022 14:34:07 GMT
www.npr.org/2022/02/21/1082229612/canadian-lawmakers-extend-emergency-powers-act-for-truck-protestsTORONTO — Canadian lawmakers voted Monday night to extend the emergency powers that police can invoke to quell any potential restart of blockades by those opposed to COVID-19 restrictions. Lawmakers in the House of Commons voted 185 to 151 to affirm the powers. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said earlier that the powers were still needed despite police ending the occupation of the nation's capital by truckers over the weekend and police ending border blockades before that. Trudeau noted there were some truckers just outside Ottawa who might be planning further blockades or occupations. His public safety minister said there was an attempt to block a border crossing in British Columbia over the weekend. "The situation is still fragile, the state of emergency is still there," Trudeau said.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 3:47:16 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2022 14:35:00 GMT
The protesters and everyone else I know, want the mandates ended. We want to go where we want, when we want, without restriction. Naturally. Like a bunch of spoiled toddlers. The mask mandates as well as the vaccines have been proven to not be as effective as the drug companies thought they would be. Please post a link to peer-reviewed study(ies) showing inefficacy of the vaccines used in the US and Canada.
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Feb 22, 2022 14:35:10 GMT
These protestors think they are being oppressed, but they are not. I agree with this guy. The protesters and everyone else I know, want the mandates ended. We want to go where we want, when we want, without restriction. The mask mandates as well as the vaccines have been proven to not be as effective as the drug companies thought they would be. EVERYONE is getting some form of covid whether you wear 6 masks or none, if you have been quadruple boosted or not. If you want to continue to wear a mask, by all means, do so. We now know that the overwhelming number of deaths, over 75%, occurred in people who had at least four comorbidities, so really these are people who were sick to begin with. We also know that the vaccine does not prevent you from getting covid and that you can get it from someone who is vaxed, boosted and masked, even if YOU are vaxed, boosted and masked. We also know that children are suffering in school because of this pandemic and that many are now far behind their learning because of virtual schooling. We know that the vast majority of people do not follow the mask mandates anyway, (super bowl and other very large sporting events, concerts, politicians not wearing masks at events, pro mask people being found on social medial without masks on, etc). We also know that a little piece of plexiglass in front of you at a register in a store does NOTHING to stop the airborne droplets from going over, under or around that little piece of plexiglass. That's just common logic FFS. At this point, we need to learn how to live with this virus and get on with life. You've made your selfishness regarding masks perfectly clear. And please show how children are suffering. Do you have any studies or personal experience? In my personal experience, elementary school kids are doing just fine with masks, even the littles and kids with sensory issues. The only ones that have a problem are adults.
|
|