|
Post by leftturnonly on Jul 27, 2016 5:13:59 GMT
You do realize that radical terrorists from the other side of the world would be shut out as well, don't you? It doesn't seem like it from your words. What you might have got from my words was me answering the OPs question about paying for promises. My words weren't about the purpose and effectiveness of walls. On the purpose of the wall though, from Donald's website, he says it will be in place to prevent Mexicans from entering and taking healthcare, education, housing, welfare and crime. Unless Mexicans are now terrorists as well as rapists and murders? www.donaldjtrump.com/positions/immigration-reformRegarding your statement to stop radical terrorists from the other side of the world, maybe there should be a dome built as well and ISIS can pay for that. If only a dome would do that! I don't care why Trump wants a wall. I care why I want one. I've given our government more than enough time to do their job and secure that southern border. They have failed big time! It's a freakin' absurdity all the crying that's being done about this most basic duty. ETA - not you, Ramblin.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 4, 2024 23:16:25 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 27, 2016 5:34:20 GMT
Regarding your statement to stop radical terrorists from the other side of the world, maybe there should be a dome built as well and ISIS can pay for that. Best statement of the night!
|
|
|
Post by crimsoncat05 on Jul 27, 2016 6:03:36 GMT
"Many students didn't go to college 30 years ago and despite what you may believe, many students today do not go to college. In fact, many people who do not go to college earn more than the students coming out of college. We need to stop encouraging teens to look at college as four years of extended teenage-hood on someone else's dime. You see it all the time. And then, we see people going to graduate school and incurring even more loans because they don't really want to go into the work force or they have nothing better to do. " ^^^^^ THIS, from ~Lauren~. Ditto-- two, three, ten times, THIS. Somewhere in the last 20-odd years, we (our society in general) were sold a bill of goods that included 'college for everyone is the way to go' and that's why we now think this-- and that generation of people is now the current crop of parents, pushing their kids to do the same. But meanwhile, there are shortages of plumbers, electricians, and countless other skilled tradespeople who yes, WOULD make a shitload more money than quite a lot of entry level college-degreed jobs out there. I heard a story on public radio this morning about a shortage of COURT REPORTERS in Arizona-- really?? They need them so badly in southern Arizona that they're looking at using cameras and computer hookups so they can work remotely! (And community colleges, while not as 'illustrious-seeming' for the special snowflakes as the 4-year colleges they want to go to, are a heckuva lot cheaper, and you DO get the same quality education, especially since you can get all of your general requirements out of the way at a community college.)
|
|
|
Post by freecharlie on Jul 27, 2016 6:29:05 GMT
"Many students didn't go to college 30 years ago and despite what you may believe, many students today do not go to college. In fact, many people who do not go to college earn more than the students coming out of college. We need to stop encouraging teens to look at college as four years of extended teenage-hood on someone else's dime. You see it all the time. And then, we see people going to graduate school and incurring even more loans because they don't really want to go into the work force or they have nothing better to do. " ^^^^^ THIS, from ~Lauren~. Ditto-- two, three, ten times, THIS. Somewhere in the last 20-odd years, we (our society in general) were sold a bill of goods that included 'college for everyone is the way to go' and that's why we now think this-- and that generation of people is now the current crop of parents, pushing their kids to do the same. But meanwhile, there are shortages of plumbers, electricians, and countless other skilled tradespeople who yes, WOULD make a shitload more money than quite a lot of entry level college-degreed jobs out there. I heard a story on public radio this morning about a shortage of COURT REPORTERS in Arizona-- really?? They need them so badly in southern Arizona that they're looking at using cameras and computer hookups so they can work remotely! (And community colleges, while not as 'illustrious-seeming' for the special snowflakes as the 4-year colleges they want to go to, are a heckuva lot cheaper, and you DO get the same quality education, especially since you can get all of your general requirements out of the way at a community college.) while I hate federal interference with education, our new testing acronym is PARCC is supposed to be partnership for academic readiness for career and college. The thought is that not every pathway needs to go to college. It is very hard to change that mindset. I make my students (I teach special ed, so I get some freedom) to research their career choices, job prospects, education or skills needed. I also point out cost of education and that the careers where you need your hands can't be shipped overseas . Many trades don't make bad money, the education costs less, and they are able to start their careers earlier. With all that said, even I want my kids to go to college unless they have a specific career in mind that requires a different path. So far my oldest has no clue, but he's 15, so maybe that will change
|
|
|
Post by leftturnonly on Jul 27, 2016 6:30:13 GMT
"Many students didn't go to college 30 years ago and despite what you may believe, many students today do not go to college. In fact, many people who do not go to college earn more than the students coming out of college. We need to stop encouraging teens to look at college as four years of extended teenage-hood on someone else's dime. You see it all the time. And then, we see people going to graduate school and incurring even more loans because they don't really want to go into the work force or they have nothing better to do. " ^^^^^ THIS, from ~Lauren~ . Ditto-- two, three, ten times, THIS. Somewhere in the last 20-odd years, we (our society in general) were sold a bill of goods that included 'college for everyone is the way to go' and that's why we now think this-- and that generation of people is now the current crop of parents, pushing their kids to do the same. But meanwhile, there are shortages of plumbers, electricians, and countless other skilled tradespeople who yes, WOULD make a shitload more money than quite a lot of entry level college-degreed jobs out there. I heard a story on public radio this morning about a shortage of COURT REPORTERS in Arizona-- really?? They need them so badly in southern Arizona that they're looking at using cameras and computer hookups so they can work remotely! (And community colleges, while not as 'illustrious-seeming' for the special snowflakes as the 4-year colleges they want to go to, are a heckuva lot cheaper, and you DO get the same quality education, especially since you can get all of your general requirements out of the way at a community college.) TRADE SCHOOLS and APPRENTICESHIPS Bring them back into high regard. Americans are not too special for them.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Jul 27, 2016 11:43:33 GMT
It's easy to overlook the fact that one of the main drivers behind the "college for everyone' movement was that schools were often guilty of funneling mostly minority students into vo-tech classes, or excluding them from college prep classes. It was also intended to combat generational poverty, where kids whose parents never finished high school often felt like college was an unattainable goal. We need to be careful not to fall back into earlier problems or undo the good we've done.
I agree that the trades need to be more highly regarded as honorable work. We're seeing some return to that here in Texas, with our diploma system changed to allow kids to choose an "endorsement" that best fits their plans and desires, rather than funneling everyone into the 4x4 college-prep plan. It's not perfect, but it's an improvement.
Are apprenticeships still a thing? I admit I have no idea. I do know I have concerns about the profusion of private, for-profit colleges that want to train kids to be plumbers and welders at tuition rates that rival the costs of four-year universities. There needs to be affordable, public institutions where people can learn those skills - and maybe there are, but I don't see them advertised like the expensive ones.
|
|
kelly8875
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,390
Location: Lost in my supplies...
Oct 26, 2014 17:02:56 GMT
|
Post by kelly8875 on Jul 27, 2016 11:46:42 GMT
Colleges pay and cost what the market will bear. Instead of offering "free college", reducing the people going to these colleges will force a reduction in employee salaries, etc. The free market would do it's job if the government would stay the f*ck out of it. And this would work if jobs, such as in the government sector, went back to just requiring high school diplomas. When was the last time you looked for a job? I have a degree, and I'd like to find a new job, but everything for which I'm qualified requires an advanced degree. These days a Master's degree is what a college degree was 30 years ago. I've read some of your other replies regarding this subject and I think you are out of touch with reality. It is almost impossible to finish college in 4 years, and even if one picks a degree in high demand there's no guarantee there'll be a job. A friend majored in engineering and graduated in 2010. The market was shit...it took him two years to find a job. Things aren't as easy as it was 30-40 years ago when you were graduating college. Finally, do you even know what tuition costs? It's not cheap like it was 30 years ago. As an employer who does hiring, I require candidates to have a college degree. Why? Because getting through high school these days is as simple as showing up. Schools pass kids through, and kids graduate. The people who have gone on to college show some sort of determination, some personal growth, and want more in life. Those are the employees I want showing up to work daily.
|
|
|
Post by anxiousmom on Jul 27, 2016 11:49:48 GMT
I agree completely Mom. A college degree is necessary if one is going into the medical, engineering, mathematical or tech fields. It is not necessary just so someone can party four years in order to get a basic liberal arts degree that does nothing for anyone. If the student or mom and dad can afford to pay for a four year liberal arts degree, great. Go for it. But if they can't, then too bad; thems the breaks So many things to say about this thread this morning. I'll start with this: I agree. Not everyone needs a college degree. There are a gazillion skilled labor jobs out there that pay well but they are simply not being filled because of the push to send every one to college. We, as a society, have made it seem as though not going to college is somehow wrong, less than. The fact of the matter is that while it is true that college does teach you a lot more than what you just learn in classes, you can learn a lot of those same lessons else where. A college education doesn't equal intelligence, but somehow we have made it seem that way and denigrated it to the point of derision. (Think about how we talk about the statistic of that, what 30% of Trump supporters are 'uneducated white men.') Not all college degrees are created equal. I am the first one to admit that I had a great time in college. I went to one of the top party schools in the nation at the time and believe me when I tell you that I fully participated in helping to keep up that title. I paid my own way though. My mom was a single mom, a dental hygienist, and she could not afford to pay for any part of my education. I had grants and loans. I graduated with what is probably the most useless degree known to humanity-a history degree. I am looking for work. I am having a really hard time finding anything-part of that is because I stayed home with the kids and my work history is spotty at best. But what is so odd to me is that jobs that years ago didn't require any kind of degree, require one now. I applied for what essentially amounts to a receptionist position that requires a college degree. Now, I understand that this is unusual for that type of job, and that because of the employer, but still. A college degree for a $13/hr position. Anyway, all that to say that as I get older, I am agreeing with Mike Rowe more and more about how not everyone is made for college. And that not everyone who doesn't go to college is destined to live in poverty. College isn't a right, it is a choice, and that we as a society need to stop categorizing those that go as elite and those that don't 'the uneducated.'
|
|
kelly8875
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,390
Location: Lost in my supplies...
Oct 26, 2014 17:02:56 GMT
|
Post by kelly8875 on Jul 27, 2016 11:53:15 GMT
Are apprenticeships still a thing? I admit I have no idea. I do know I have concerns about the profusion of private, for-profit colleges that want to train kids to be plumbers and welders at tuition rates that rival the costs of four-year universities. There needs to be affordable, public institutions where people can learn those skills - and maybe there are, but I don't see them advertised like the expensive ones. My family business is Union. We are Union Millwrights, with a full 4 year apprenticeship program. There is hands on learning, classes, and requires steps to become a Journeyman. A Journeyman in our area earns at least $25/hours. Stick with it a little, show your worth, and you can earn more above that as a foreman or Master Millwright. Several of our guys make over $100,000 a year...sounds like a great career path of you ask me! But can we find enough people to hire? Nope. Because schools only talk college and talk down the trades. Our community college is working hard with area schools these days to show that the trades are valid career paths. Without these trade workers, we will be without employees who put this world together. They are just as important as doctors and lawyers and teachers.
|
|
raindancer
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,095
Jun 26, 2014 20:10:29 GMT
|
Post by raindancer on Jul 27, 2016 11:53:37 GMT
We can fund those things. We choose not too. It's really not a difficult concept. I think it actually is a difficult concept. What do you cut? What do you keep? How do you choose? What gets priority? How much do you tax? How do you tax? What happens when something costs more that was budgeted? Where does that money come form? You think about this from the point of view of someone running a small budget. The problem is that they aren't thinking about these things in terms of cash flow. They think about the budget in terms of who they owe, who donated the most, and who will get them re elected. If you actually think programs are funded by purely looking at cash flow in and out, I have some lovely ocean front property in Arizona I'd like to sell you.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Jul 27, 2016 11:53:54 GMT
Take Donald's wall for example - he is telling his voters his philosophy is to shut out Mexicans. You do realize that radical terrorists from the other side of the world would be shut out as well, don't you? Would they really? What is to stop Mexicans, radical terrorists or anyone else from just taking a boat from the coast of Mexico to some deserted part of the coast of Texas or California? What is to stop terrorists from coming through Canada instead? Are we going to build a wall there as well? Wall off our coasts? I just don't believe this is a viable or practical way to solve our problems.
|
|
|
Post by leftturnonly on Jul 27, 2016 11:55:39 GMT
It's easy to overlook the fact that one of the main drivers behind the "college for everyone' movement was that schools were often guilty of funneling mostly minority students into vo-tech classes, or excluding them from college prep classes. It was also intended to combat generational poverty, where kids whose parents never finished high school often felt like college was an unattainable goal. We need to be careful not to fall back into earlier problems or undo the good we've done. I have no idea what that means.
My high school had a very good vo-tech program that immediately got students into the workforce in jobs that were good enough to raise families on. They were not minority students.
My father and my husband served apprenticeships which didn't preclude them from further education.
Talk about generational poverty, that apprenticeship helped pull my father out of poverty. He put 3 children through college.I agree that the trades need to be more highly regarded as honorable work. We're seeing some return to that here in Texas, with our diploma system changed to allow kids to choose an "endorsement" that best fits their plans and desires, rather than funneling everyone into the 4x4 college-prep plan. It's not perfect, but it's an improvement. Are apprenticeships still a thing? I admit I have no idea. I do know I have concerns about the profusion of private, for-profit colleges that want to train kids to be plumbers and welders at tuition rates that rival the costs of four-year universities. There needs to be affordable, public institutions where people can learn those skills - and maybe there are, but I don't see them advertised like the expensive ones. I imagine an apprenticeship could be created if there wasn't one. It's a valuable tool for both employers and those learning a trade. When all else fails, it's sometimes a good idea to fall back on the tried and true.
One thing I absolutely know for sure is that there will always be work for people who work on air conditioners, plumbing, etc. You can't export every job to China.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Jul 27, 2016 11:56:17 GMT
Are apprenticeships still a thing? I admit I have no idea. I do know I have concerns about the profusion of private, for-profit colleges that want to train kids to be plumbers and welders at tuition rates that rival the costs of four-year universities. There needs to be affordable, public institutions where people can learn those skills - and maybe there are, but I don't see them advertised like the expensive ones. My family business is Union. We are Union Millwrights, with a full 4 year apprenticeship program. There is hands on learning, classes, and requires steps to become a Journeyman. A Journeyman in our area earns at least $25/hours. Stick with it a little, show your worth, and you can earn more above that as a foreman or Master Millwright. Several of our guys make over $100,000 a year...sounds like a great career path of you ask me! But can we find enough people to hire? Nope. Because schools only talk college and talk down the trades. Our community college is working hard with area schools these days to show that the trades are valid career paths. Without these trade workers, we will be without employees who put this world together. They are just as important as doctors and lawyers and teachers. That is good to know. Is the four-year apprenticeship program unpaid? How does that work? Sorry for my ignorance.
|
|
raindancer
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,095
Jun 26, 2014 20:10:29 GMT
|
Post by raindancer on Jul 27, 2016 11:56:36 GMT
And this would work if jobs, such as in the government sector, went back to just requiring high school diplomas. When was the last time you looked for a job? I have a degree, and I'd like to find a new job, but everything for which I'm qualified requires an advanced degree. These days a Master's degree is what a college degree was 30 years ago. I've read some of your other replies regarding this subject and I think you are out of touch with reality. It is almost impossible to finish college in 4 years, and even if one picks a degree in high demand there's no guarantee there'll be a job. A friend majored in engineering and graduated in 2010. The market was shit...it took him two years to find a job. Things aren't as easy as it was 30-40 years ago when you were graduating college. Finally, do you even know what tuition costs? It's not cheap like it was 30 years ago. As an employer who does hiring, I require candidates to have a college degree. Why? Because getting through high school these days is as simple as showing up. Schools pass kids through, and kids graduate. The people who have gone on to college show some sort of determination, some personal growth, and want more in life. Those are the employees I want showing up to work daily. I agree. My sisters district does not allow kids to be retained. So they show up or dont, do work or dont...Still move along.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Jul 27, 2016 11:59:42 GMT
It's easy to overlook the fact that one of the main drivers behind the "college for everyone' movement was that schools were often guilty of funneling mostly minority students into vo-tech classes, or excluding them from college prep classes. It was also intended to combat generational poverty, where kids whose parents never finished high school often felt like college was an unattainable goal. We need to be careful not to fall back into earlier problems or undo the good we've done. I have no idea what that means.
My high school had a very good vo-tech program that immediately got students into the workforce in jobs that were good enough to raise families on. They were not minority students.
My father and my husband served apprenticeships which didn't preclude them from further education.
Talk about generational poverty, that apprenticeship helped pull my father out of poverty. He put 3 children through college.I agree that the trades need to be more highly regarded as honorable work. We're seeing some return to that here in Texas, with our diploma system changed to allow kids to choose an "endorsement" that best fits their plans and desires, rather than funneling everyone into the 4x4 college-prep plan. It's not perfect, but it's an improvement. Are apprenticeships still a thing? I admit I have no idea. I do know I have concerns about the profusion of private, for-profit colleges that want to train kids to be plumbers and welders at tuition rates that rival the costs of four-year universities. There needs to be affordable, public institutions where people can learn those skills - and maybe there are, but I don't see them advertised like the expensive ones. I imagine an apprenticeship could be created if there wasn't one. It's a valuable tool for both employers and those learning a trade. When all else fails, it's sometimes a good idea to fall back on the tried and true.
One thing I absolutely know for sure is that there will always be work for people who work on air conditioners, plumbing, etc. You can't export every job to China.I agree with you. But whether it happened at your school or not, it did happen that minority students overall were more likely to be excluded from college-prep classes. How do apprenticeships work? Are they paid? Or does the apprentice need a second job to live on while serving his/her apprenticeship? Not arguing with you - just not sure how all this works. We're on the same side here.
|
|
|
Post by anxiousmom on Jul 27, 2016 12:00:32 GMT
I do know I have concerns about the profusion of private, for-profit colleges that want to train kids to be plumbers and welders at tuition rates that rival the costs of four-year universities. There needs to be affordable, public institutions where people can learn those skills - and maybe there are, but I don't see them advertised like the expensive ones. This is one of my biggest, stand up on a soap box and scream to the heavens issues. You should be concerned-those for profit schools are a big problem. The latest statistic that I read is that is that 30% (give or take) of all student loans are given to students at those type schools and that those 30% are responsible for almost 60% of student loan defaults. The majority of those school are subpar, prey on the weak, and in some cases charge for a two year "degree" what a state college charges for a four year degree including costs associated with housing. A second insult occurs when some of those students decide they want to further their education and they learn that not only do their credits not transfer to an accredited college degree program, but in many cases have capped out their grant dollar amounts and are only eligible for more loans. It is HUGELY concerning.
|
|
|
Post by leftturnonly on Jul 27, 2016 12:00:54 GMT
I agree completely Mom. A college degree is necessary if one is going into the medical, engineering, mathematical or tech fields. It is not necessary just so someone can party four years in order to get a basic liberal arts degree that does nothing for anyone. If the student or mom and dad can afford to pay for a four year liberal arts degree, great. Go for it. But if they can't, then too bad; thems the breaks So many things to say about this thread this morning. I'll start with this: I agree. Not everyone needs a college degree. There are a gazillion skilled labor jobs out there that pay well but they are simply not being filled because of the push to send every one to college. We, as a society, have made it seem as though not going to college is somehow wrong, less than. The fact of the matter is that while it is true that college does teach you a lot more than what you just learn in classes, you can learn a lot of those same lessons else where. A college education doesn't equal intelligence, but somehow we have made it seem that way and denigrated it to the point of derision. (Think about how we talk about the statistic of that, what 30% of Trump supporters are 'uneducated white men.') Not all college degrees are created equal. I am the first one to admit that I had a great time in college. I went to one of the top party schools in the nation at the time and believe me when I tell you that I fully participated in helping to keep up that title. I paid my own way though. My mom was a single mom, a dental hygienist, and she could not afford to pay for any part of my education. I had grants and loans. I graduated with what is probably the most useless degree known to humanity-a history degree. I am looking for work. I am having a really hard time finding anything-part of that is because I stayed home with the kids and my work history is spotty at best. But what is so odd to me is that jobs that years ago didn't require any kind of degree, require one now. I applied for what essentially amounts to a receptionist position that requires a college degree. Now, I understand that this is unusual for that type of job, and that because of the employer, but still. A college degree for a $13/hr position. Anyway, all that to say that as I get older, I am agreeing with Mike Rowe more and more about how not everyone is made for college. And that not everyone who doesn't go to college is destined to live in poverty. College isn't a right, it is a choice, and that we as a society need to stop categorizing those that go as elite and those that don't 'the uneducated.' Clap clap clap. College is actually a terrible choice for a lot of kids. It's ridiculous to make someone have a college degree to become a receptionist. Sure, it might show that they have more determination, but it also might show that they delayed assuming the responsibilities of an adult by 4 years.
|
|
schizo319
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,030
Jun 28, 2014 0:26:58 GMT
|
Post by schizo319 on Jul 27, 2016 12:02:25 GMT
We aren't. Most of those things don't have a chance in hell of coming to fruition. Have we ever had a president make good on a majority of the things that he campaigned on?
I will hand it to them though, at least they are saying specifically what they want to do vs. "Hillary sucks, the world is doomed, but we're gonna make it great! Hillary sucks, Hillary is evil, Hillary is a liar, I'm the only hope to save this country, and have I mentioned Hillary sucks?"
This election is like choosing between a shit sandwich and a turd burger.
|
|
|
Post by DinCA on Jul 27, 2016 12:05:41 GMT
A huge YES to bringing back trade and vocational schooling. There is great money to be made in the trades, union or not. I'd even go so far to say they pay better than a lot of jobs requiring a college degree, as anxiousmom just confirmed.
|
|
kelly8875
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,390
Location: Lost in my supplies...
Oct 26, 2014 17:02:56 GMT
|
Post by kelly8875 on Jul 27, 2016 12:09:51 GMT
My family business is Union. We are Union Millwrights, with a full 4 year apprenticeship program. There is hands on learning, classes, and requires steps to become a Journeyman. A Journeyman in our area earns at least $25/hours. Stick with it a little, show your worth, and you can earn more above that as a foreman or Master Millwright. Several of our guys make over $100,000 a year...sounds like a great career path of you ask me! But can we find enough people to hire? Nope. Because schools only talk college and talk down the trades. Our community college is working hard with area schools these days to show that the trades are valid career paths. Without these trade workers, we will be without employees who put this world together. They are just as important as doctors and lawyers and teachers. That is good to know. Is the four-year apprenticeship program unpaid? How does that work? Sorry for my ignorance. Yes, it's paid. When they're working, they're paid. A pre-apprentice starts at $14/hour with no skills. They show they can grow, apply for the program, and can easily get in. Pay raises are every 6 months! The only time they aren't paid, is when they're at "school" for a week or two taking classes. But, if they've been working for our company and in good standing, they can draw unemployment for that time uncontested. Without the classes, they won't advance.
|
|
|
Post by leftturnonly on Jul 27, 2016 12:10:52 GMT
I agree with you. But whether it happened at your school or not, it did happen that minority students overall were more likely to be excluded from college-prep classes. How do apprenticeships work? Are they paid? Or does the apprentice need a second job to live on while serving his/her apprenticeship? Not arguing with you - just not sure how all this works. We're on the same side here. I've known we're on the same side for a very long time. Yes. Apprenticeships should pay you for the work you do as you are learning the skill or trade. It's not going to be as much as you will earn once you finish the apprenticeship and move onto the next level, but it will be something. I know that there are apprenticeships in broadcasting that seem to be voluntary where they don't get paid. So, without researching it, I'd have to say that there are some that don't pay with the idea that the experience is worth it.
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Jul 27, 2016 12:12:44 GMT
A huge YES to bringing back trade and vocational schooling. There is great money to be made in the trades, union or not. I'd even go so far to say they pay better than a lot of jobs requiring a college degree, as anxiousmom just confirmed. Oh, absolutely. I know for a fact that my auto mechanic lives in a much nicer house than I do, and drives a nicer car. DH and I both have masters degrees. Our auto mechanic friend has no degree. One of our neighbors is a plumber and is doing very well for himself. He works his butt off. We recently bought a new dishwasher, and the man who came out to install it was very nice and knowledgeable about all things house-related. It was a tricky installation because of the way the builder did our house, and required some skills other than just knowing how to hook up a dishwasher. But what I really liked was the fact that he had a younger worker with him, and was teaching this young man as he went - not only about the appliance installation, but about dealing with problems as they come up, working with customers, etc. I don't know if he was an apprentice or just a younger employee this guy had taken under his wing, but the young man was getting an education far beyond a simple training class.
|
|
|
Post by jamielynn on Jul 27, 2016 12:38:52 GMT
On the flip side, how is a Trump going to pay for the wall (since I'm pretty sure Mexico won't pay for it)? How will he round up and deport 11 million illegals? On the first question, wasn't the plan to begin taxing foreign goods (Mexico being one) coming in - to fund the wall among other things? The idea also would boost the American economy as that would increase the cost of foreign goods so they aren't much lower to buy compared to those made here; which in turn would boost the American jobs and hopefully defer the businesses here from out sourcing so much for cost savings and staying competitive. Isn't this what many other countries are already doing? I hadn't honestly read up on his plan with illegals but love the idea of the tax on foreign goods and can't believe we are still allowing our economy to suffer so badly to allow goods coming in at no/minimal cost to compete with our own business sector.
|
|
|
Post by sphmaz on Jul 27, 2016 12:55:23 GMT
I'm sure the old mantra "the rich aren't paying their fair share" will be used to continue the class warfare. 49% of the people in this country pay no federal income tax whatsoever. How about we start by taxing 100% of the adults in this country. Let's limit the amount of unemployment benefits, the amount of "disability" benefits and some of the other handouts that are given to people to enable them to stay home while the rest of us support them just so they can shout "the rich aren't paying their fair share". Maybe then, we'll have some money for these other things. Doubtful, but maybe. Also, I don't feel that the government should be providing free day care or free college. If you choose to have a baby, it's your responsibility as the parent to pay for child care. If you choose to go to college, there are grants and loans. Choose your courses and your schools wisely and in accordance with your financial ability to pay now and in the future. This ridiculous idea that the government (aka, those people who actually work and are taxed) should pay for people's life choices is one of the main reasons I will not vote for a Democrat. I've said it before and I'll keep on saying it; a right to do something does not mean that there is a right to have others pay for you to exercise your right. This...because I could not put it into words the way you did!
|
|
inkedup
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,837
Jun 26, 2014 5:00:26 GMT
|
Post by inkedup on Jul 27, 2016 13:34:07 GMT
That is good to know. Is the four-year apprenticeship program unpaid? How does that work? Sorry for my ignorance. Yes, it's paid. When they're working, they're paid. A pre-apprentice starts at $14/hour with no skills. They show they can grow, apply for the program, and can easily get in. Pay raises are every 6 months! The only time they aren't paid, is when they're at "school" for a week or two taking classes. But, if they've been working for our company and in good standing, they can draw unemployment for that time uncontested. Without the classes, they won't advance. "When they are working" is key here; one of my cousins is an apprentice millwright. He has endured long stretches of unemployment because there is no work for him. Nothing is guaranteed, but I don't think reality is quite as peachy as you're painting it.
|
|
|
Post by secondlife on Jul 27, 2016 13:55:16 GMT
What you basically just said is, since when should financial and career success be available to everyone? No, this is not what I said. I said that some jobs shouldn't be available to everyone. If you don't have a degree or are qualified for a particular job, then you shouldn't get upset that those who do have a degree and/or are qualified to get that job. The idea that everyone is equal on every playing field is crazy.
Right after you said, we should be looking to ourselves for solutions. And I don't think that works. College opens doors. I think if we don't look at how to make college affordable and effective we run the very real risk of closing off success for those without the means to get those doors open, perpetuating a cycle in which those with financial means are more able to further obtain success than those without. I grew up poor as dirt in rural Appalachia. My husband did too. The only way we achieved anything is by going to college. The only way we went to college is with grants and loans. Of course every job should have been open to younger us, with a whole life full of possibilities waiting. We had potential, we had ability - and we had disadvantages. I'm not saying our education should have been free. Just that it should be affordable for all the kids just like us who fought tooth and nail to get anywhere in life. If success isn't open to every person who has the fortitude to work for it then that is not what I think this country should be. Don't be upset if there's a job you want that takes more education than you have. But if you can't afford the education, don't expect to get the education - that is for people who can afford it. But we should look to ourselves for solutions. I get it. I just disagree. When there was a job i wanted, but I wasn't qualified for, I went to school and got the education I needed . I didn't expect someone to give me a job I wasn't qualified for. But I needed - fought for and received - loans and grants and institutional aid, and being as it was a public school that was state money and I don't apologize for that. Financial aid for higher education meant that I had the option of becoming a reasonably well paid professional when the alternative at home was working at Walmart. Or Food City or maybe Roses even. I don't think it helps us as a country to not promote success among the upcoming generation. Since I got my undergrad degree, the cost at the same school has quadrupled. What am I supposed to say to my kid's generation? Sorry you can't afford it - I got mine, so you figure it out for yourself? No thanks. So I do expect that we as a country should find ways to make higher education accessible, affordable, and effective. Not because I think people should just have jobs they aren't qualified for - but because I think people should have access to the tools that qualify them for the jobs they want and the financial future they are looking for. And that is what I mean by success being open to us.
|
|
scorpeao
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,521
Location: NorCal USA
Jun 25, 2014 21:04:54 GMT
|
Post by scorpeao on Jul 27, 2016 13:58:39 GMT
And this would work if jobs, such as in the government sector, went back to just requiring high school diplomas. When was the last time you looked for a job? I have a degree, and I'd like to find a new job, but everything for which I'm qualified requires an advanced degree. These days a Master's degree is what a college degree was 30 years ago. I've read some of your other replies regarding this subject and I think you are out of touch with reality. It is almost impossible to finish college in 4 years, and even if one picks a degree in high demand there's no guarantee there'll be a job. A friend majored in engineering and graduated in 2010. The market was shit...it took him two years to find a job. Things aren't as easy as it was 30-40 years ago when you were graduating college. Finally, do you even know what tuition costs? It's not cheap like it was 30 years ago. As an employer who does hiring, I require candidates to have a college degree. Why? Because getting through high school these days is as simple as showing up. Schools pass kids through, and kids graduate. The people who have gone on to college show some sort of determination, some personal growth, and want more in life. Those are the employees I want showing up to work daily. And again, this is part of the problem. Why not ask to see high school transcripts? My dd worked her ass off in high school. She was in marching band, drumline, jazz band, and wind ensemble. She also worked a part time job while doing all that. I don't know how you can say getting through high school these days is as simple as showing up. When I graduated high school many years ago it WAS as simple as showing up. In fact, simpler because I rarely studied or cracked a book...my dd wasn't in honors classes and she was always doing homework or studying for tests.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Jul 27, 2016 13:59:54 GMT
There are trade school and apprenticeship's here.
I don't think in our area that there is less of a push into trades vs more if a push to attend a 2-4 year college (if there is, we're not aware).
I think what stops many from entering the trades is that the see those years before them struggling with massive layoff's (construction). There are more and more rules being placed on these trades in which they have to assume the costs. More and more insurance, bonding, higher fees for licenses and permits. The overhead and supply costs can be overwhelming.
And, when these trades tell customers their fee for a service call upfront, they get accused of trying to rip them off!! (Reasonable fee too)--and those doing that don't even consider that they wouldn't work for free either!
I'm afraid that it will get worse with a Trump win; with all his contract breaching and renegotiating after the work was done at an agreed on price, where he brags about it being great business--screwing the contractors--that it will become mainstream and others will start following that to make it the norm.
|
|
johnnysmom
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,682
Jun 25, 2014 21:16:33 GMT
|
Post by johnnysmom on Jul 27, 2016 14:02:26 GMT
As an employer who does hiring, I require candidates to have a college degree. Why? Because getting through high school these days is as simple as showing up. Schools pass kids through, and kids graduate. The people who have gone on to college show some sort of determination, some personal growth, and want more in life. Those are the employees I want showing up to work daily. Until this mindset (not picking on you Kelly, I think this is commonplace among employers everywhere) changes everyone will need, or feel the need, to go to college. I know my husband has basically forced me back to college for this exact reason. If I ever need/want to work outside the home again I'll have a hard time getting anything paying more than $10/hr without a degree. I don't want to be in college at 40, but since I didn't go at 20 I don't really have a choice.
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Jul 27, 2016 14:03:34 GMT
What you might have got from my words was me answering the OPs question about paying for promises. My words weren't about the purpose and effectiveness of walls. On the purpose of the wall though, from Donald's website, he says it will be in place to prevent Mexicans from entering and taking healthcare, education, housing, welfare and crime. Unless Mexicans are now terrorists as well as rapists and murders? www.donaldjtrump.com/positions/immigration-reformRegarding your statement to stop radical terrorists from the other side of the world, maybe there should be a dome built as well and ISIS can pay for that. If only a dome would do that! I don't care why Trump wants a wall. I care why I want one. I've given our government more than enough time to do their job and secure that southern border. They have failed big time! It's a freakin' absurdity all the crying that's being done about this most basic duty. ETA - not you, Ramblin. There was a good segment on one of the news stations the other day regarding the southern border. They talked to border guards and also had a breakdown of how many people are entering (or being apprehended? Can't remember which) each year. It is actually very low right now. Eta that I am not explaining it very well. Trying to get ready for work but also reading the thread. . Basically, they were saying that the numbers that were entering illegally was much lower than in the past but the number being deported is highest. So, there IS some progress being made. I wish I could remember which network it was on so I could find a link. They also talked to border agents who said that additional wall is not necessary (they were in an area where there was a partial wall but that at the end of it you could just look around it into Mexico). They said that the technology that they have recently gotten is very helpful, and that the money they have asked for to increase their budget had NOT been to add on to the wall, as they don't see that as necessary.
|
|