|
Post by pjaye on Jan 26, 2017 3:43:20 GMT
The latest from Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto:
I honestly do not understand how Trump thinks he can make another country pay for something that he wants to do.
Is there something I am missing here?...can someone explain to me how/why Trump thinks he can make Mexico pay for that wall? It doesn't seem in any way logical or plausible to me, yet he keeps saying it again and again...why is he so confident he can make this happen? I understand that if he wants to build a giant wall on American soil...then he probably can do this, but the whole 'making another country pay for it' aspect has me baffled...
|
|
|
Post by roxley on Jan 26, 2017 3:48:08 GMT
I think through bullying them, or as he puts is "making deals". I don't know how much we give Mexico for other things each year, but he could just say "we are keeping that money as your first payment." I don't know how many decades it would take to pay for our billion dollar wall. Edited - Oops! My mistake. Apparently it is an 8 - 14 billion dollar wall. ( I thought I was exaggerating).
|
|
|
Post by peano on Jan 26, 2017 3:50:07 GMT
The latest from Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto:
I honestly do not understand how Trump thinks he can make another country pay for something that he wants to do.
Is there something I am missing here?...can someone explain to me how/why Trump thinks he can make Mexico pay for that wall? It doesn't seem in any way logical or plausible to me, yet he keeps saying it again and again...why is he so confident he can make this happen? I understand that if he wants to build a giant wall on American soil...then he probably can do this, but the whole 'making another country pay for it' aspect has me baffled...
All I'm going to say is that Vincente Fox kicks ass!
|
|
|
Post by Merge on Jan 26, 2017 3:53:42 GMT
I find myself rooting against my own country in this scenario. Because my president is totally in the wrong on this.
He can't expect another country to pay for his boondoggle. This is all a vanity project for him and we're going to pay for it with funds that could have been used for much-needed programs that would actually help Americans.
I still can't believe that so many Americans were fooled by Trump.
|
|
~Lauren~
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,876
Jun 26, 2014 3:33:18 GMT
|
Post by ~Lauren~ on Jan 26, 2017 3:56:30 GMT
I think through bullying them, or as he puts is "making deals". I don't know how much we give Mexico for other things each year, but he could just say "we are keeping that money as your first payment." I don't know how many decades it would take to pay for our billion dollar wall. Not sure. But then again, if you consider the "savings" in welfare monies, educating, providing medical care for and the costs of crimes committed by illegal aliens, it'll get paid a lot quicker.
|
|
|
Post by pjaye on Jan 26, 2017 3:57:56 GMT
OK, I guess that at least makes some sort of sense...to decrease the financial aid given to Mexico by the USA until the 'wall debt' is paid off. Cruel, and would probably result in a lot of deaths for the poorest people of that country...but I guess as long as he gets that wall, who cares about a few more dead Mexicans?
Logic would dictate that if they need foreign aid in the first place, then that country probably can't afford to pay for any wall.
|
|
|
Post by micheley on Jan 26, 2017 4:00:26 GMT
Logic? Hahahahahahahahaha *deepbreath* hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Jan 26, 2017 4:00:28 GMT
OK, I guess that at least makes some sort of sense...to decrease the financial aid given to Mexico by the USA until the 'wall debt' is paid off. Cruel, and would probably result in a lot of deaths for the poorest people of that country...but I guess as long as he gets that wall, who cares about a few more dead Mexicans? Logic would dictate that if they need foreign aid in the first place, then that country probably can't afford to pay for any wall. Not to mention that "savings" does not equate to payments made by the government to the contractors doing the work on the wall. US Taxpayers. That is who will be footing this wall. Get ready to open your wallets!
|
|
casii
Drama Llama
Posts: 5,464
Jun 29, 2014 14:40:44 GMT
|
Post by casii on Jan 26, 2017 4:00:42 GMT
I find myself rooting against my own country in this scenario. Because my president is totally in the wrong on this. He can't expect another country to pay for his boondoggle. This is all a vanity project for him and we're going to pay for it with funds that could have been used for much-needed programs that would actually help Americans. I still can't believe that so many Americans were fooled by Trump. Oh girl, my cousin told me today that Trump was going to deport my liberal snowflake ass when I expressed doubt that that Mexico could be made to pay for a wall, so a lot of people believe in it. What the plan is essentially to rob Peter to pay Paul. We'll be paying for it however Trump tries to market it. I'm curious if anyone watched his interview this evening and how that might've been addressed.
|
|
|
Post by pjaye on Jan 26, 2017 4:07:12 GMT
US Taxpayers. That is who will be footing this wall. True, I guess it's still going to be "American" money, follow the logic: - taxes collected from American people -> given to Mexico as foreign aid, changes to: - taxes collected from American people -> no longer given to Mexico, now used to pay for wall building = it's still American taxpayer money, not "paid for by the Mexicans" at all.
|
|
|
Post by roxley on Jan 26, 2017 4:10:52 GMT
US Taxpayers. That is who will be footing this wall. True, I guess it's still going to be "American" money, follow the logic: - taxes collected from American people -> given to Mexico as foreign aid, changes to: - taxes collected from American people -> no longer given to Mexico, now used to pay for wall building = it's still American taxpayer money, not "paid for by the Mexicans" at all. Yep. But he will give us an "alternate fact" to explain it.
|
|
|
Post by pjaye on Jan 26, 2017 4:13:13 GMT
Huh.
I'm going to make that hungry homeless man who lives under the over-pass near me, pay for my dinner tonight...
I have a $10 bill in my wallet. I was going to give the homeless man that $10 bill. Now I'm not giving him the $10 and buying my dinner with it instead.
Woohoo, I made a homeless man pay for my dinner! Yeah, a free dinner for me!
Is that how it works?
|
|
|
Post by pierkiss on Jan 26, 2017 4:17:05 GMT
I thought I read that this stupid wall will take over 700 years to pay off? Anyone else see that?
|
|
|
Post by micheley on Jan 26, 2017 4:24:27 GMT
I thought I read that this stupid wall will take over 700 years to pay off? Anyone else see that? Someone here I think divided the cost of the wall - $35b - and divided by aid we annually give Mexico - $51m. Not to mention annual maintenance on the wall and annual salaries for the staff I presume will patrol and monitor it etc.
|
|
suzastampin
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,587
Jun 28, 2014 14:32:59 GMT
|
Post by suzastampin on Jan 26, 2017 4:25:05 GMT
Somebody needs to sit him down and watch the video of the tunnels from Mexico to the US. He can build all the wall he wants, but they are still going to be able to come to America illegally.. I believe it was ABC that showed one tunnel some time in the last month or so. It was huge, had electric and there was a motorcycle in it to get from one end to the other. The drug lords should be able to make a fortune charging people to use their tunnel to the US.
He's just wasting our hard earned tax dollars building the damn wall.
|
|
|
Post by pjaye on Jan 26, 2017 4:25:54 GMT
I thought I read that this stupid wall will take over 700 years to pay off? Anyone else see that? Well, technically no, I suppose it will only take around 4 years...until the next President stops that nonsense. Then your tax dollars will be able to pay for it much faster.
|
|
PLurker
Prolific Pea
Posts: 9,743
Location: Behind the Cheddar Curtain
Jun 28, 2014 3:48:49 GMT
|
Post by PLurker on Jan 26, 2017 4:28:27 GMT
I thought I read that this stupid wall will take over 700 years to pay off? Anyone else see that? Yep, I did but don't recall where. What I recall- It was written by a person who is for tighter immigration laws but also a stats guy and if we "made Mexico pay" for the wall by with holding $ going there now it would take 737(?) years to pay it off. That's from my overloaded brain that can't recall details other than "insane". Maybe I'll try google
|
|
|
Post by micheley on Jan 26, 2017 4:29:18 GMT
I'm curious if anyone watched his interview this evening and how that might've been addressed. No, we watched The Hunted. I told dh we should probably have taken notes in case things really do go totally to shit.
|
|
~Lauren~
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,876
Jun 26, 2014 3:33:18 GMT
|
Post by ~Lauren~ on Jan 26, 2017 4:36:02 GMT
So, can someone answer a serious question I have? You're against the wall; you're against deporting people who are here illegally. How do you propose to deal with the never ending influx of people here illegally? How do you propose to deal with the financial drain on border states? How do you propose to deal with the crimes, the death, the injury and the losses caused by people who are here illegally (some of them whom have entered the country illegally several times?)
I think people are turning to a wall because no solutions to these issues are proposed or enacted. Merely saying "enforce the laws better" means nothing, especially when you have cities refusing to abide by those laws.
|
|
|
Post by papersilly on Jan 26, 2017 4:36:31 GMT
He knows perfectly well that he can't make Mexico pay or it. I think it's just posturing to keep his followers engaged. He just needs to say "build a wall" every few weeks to keep his people hopeful.
|
|
pudgygroundhog
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,643
Location: The Grand Canyon
Jun 25, 2014 20:18:39 GMT
|
Post by pudgygroundhog on Jan 26, 2017 4:37:47 GMT
I don't think this will be as easy as he thinks. I've read some articles about the true hawks in the Republican party that aren't too keen on the billions it will cost to build then maintain (not to mention the billions in lost revenue - through taxes immigrants pay and their role in the economy). That also doesn't take into account other issues like potential lawsuits from eminent domain land grabs.
I think his supporters can understand a wall, but don't understand more nuanced immigration reform, which is really what is needed. The wall is flashy, but it's not a true solution. And I hope they do thorough vetting of companies bidding on contracts to make sure all their workers are legal. Don't want to be like the firm in San Diego that won a contract to bid a wall, then were found to be using illegal immigrants. Oops!
As for getting Mexico to pay. Yea, good luck with that. And anything we impose on Mexico can have unintended consequences. Does he really think all countries are going to bow down to us and give into our demands without any kind of repercussions?
|
|
huskergal
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,992
Jun 25, 2014 20:22:13 GMT
|
Post by huskergal on Jan 26, 2017 4:40:08 GMT
I am for deporting illegals who commit crimes. I am for allowing immigrants who wish to work here, easy access to work visas.
I support allowing a pathway to citizenship for those who came here illegally and are contributing members of our society.
I would rather see more time and effort spent on finding those who participate in criminal activity and trying to stem the flow of drugs into the country.
|
|
pudgygroundhog
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,643
Location: The Grand Canyon
Jun 25, 2014 20:18:39 GMT
|
Post by pudgygroundhog on Jan 26, 2017 4:40:59 GMT
Somebody needs to sit him down and watch the video of the tunnels from Mexico to the US. He can build all the wall he wants, but they are still going to be able to come to America illegally.. I believe it was ABC that showed one tunnel some time in the last month or so. It was huge, had electric and there was a motorcycle in it to get from one end to the other. The drug lords should be able to make a fortune charging people to use their tunnel to the US. He's just wasting our hard earned tax dollars building the damn wall. As long as there are jobs here and people are trying to escape desperate circumstances, they will keep coming. And many illegal immigrants don't even come through Mexico - they overstay visas. I read something that looked at the logistics of mass deportation and that would cost a fortune just in plane tickets alone (not to mention housing/feeding/taking care of people while cases worked through the system and the money needed to staff and train personnel).
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Jan 26, 2017 4:41:52 GMT
I am against the wall because I think it is too expensive, I don't for a minute think that Mexico will pay for it, there are other ways that people can come in. My understanding is that there have been more deportations and fewer people coming in in recent years. I would build on what is working to make that happen.
I do not want to see "dreamers" deported. Criminals? Yes. People who have been here for years and are productive members of society? No.
|
|
pudgygroundhog
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,643
Location: The Grand Canyon
Jun 25, 2014 20:18:39 GMT
|
Post by pudgygroundhog on Jan 26, 2017 4:44:58 GMT
I am for deporting illegals who commit crimes. I am for allowing immigrants who wish to work here, easy access to work visas. I support allowing a pathway to citizenship for those who came here illegally and are contributing members of our society. I would rather see more time and effort spent on finding those who participate in criminal activity and trying to stem the flow of drugs into the country. I think people would be surprised if they knew how many illegal immigrants Obama deported (focusing on those who commit crimes). I think reform is needed to account for the huge part illegal immigrants play in the economy. Frankly, I think the drug thing is a lost cause. As long as there is a market here for it - it will keep coming. I think any solutions to the drug problem have to go to the root of the problems, rather than trying to prevent drugs from coming in the country (not that we should just let drugs flow freely, but I think it is a losing battle - especially when much the current opiate epidemic is a result of legal painkillers anyway).
|
|
|
Post by katlady on Jan 26, 2017 4:45:50 GMT
I thought I read that this stupid wall will take over 700 years to pay off? Anyone else see that? I wrote that on another thread. I saw an article that said at $50 million in annual aid to Mexico, and a wall that will cost about $35 billion, it will take over 700 years to pay off that thing. Of course, that is still taxpayer money!
|
|
Judy26
Pearl Clutcher
MOTFY Bitchy Nursemaid
Posts: 2,834
Location: NW PA
Jun 25, 2014 23:50:38 GMT
|
Post by Judy26 on Jan 26, 2017 4:46:05 GMT
I read a quote today from a Mexican newspaper humorist that said something like "Not to worry. The Mexican people are not stupid. When Trump went low, Michelle Obama taught Americans to go higher. For us when Trump builds high, no problem. We just go under!"
|
|
pudgygroundhog
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 4,643
Location: The Grand Canyon
Jun 25, 2014 20:18:39 GMT
|
Post by pudgygroundhog on Jan 26, 2017 4:47:14 GMT
I am against the wall because I think it is too expensive, I don't for a minute think that Mexico will pay for it, there are other ways that people can come in. My understanding is that there have been more deportations and fewer people coming in in recent years. I would build on what is working to make that happen. I do not want to see "dreamers" deported. Criminals? Yes. People who have been here for years and are productive members of society? No. True - the numbers have been greatly exaggerated. It's actually been stagnant - I think I read that 500,000 illegal immigrants come in a year, but roughly the same number leave. And the numbers took a hit during the housing bust because the economy was down and there weren't as many jobs. And is the wall going to also keep illegal immigrants in that want to go back home?
|
|
~Lauren~
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 3,876
Jun 26, 2014 3:33:18 GMT
|
Post by ~Lauren~ on Jan 26, 2017 4:47:39 GMT
I am for deporting illegals who commit crimes. I am for allowing immigrants who wish to work here, easy access to work visas. I support allowing a pathway to citizenship for those who came here illegally and are contributing members of our society. I would rather see more time and effort spent on finding those who participate in criminal activity and trying to stem the flow of drugs into the country. But supposing we do these things. How do we prevent even more illegals from just slipping into our country?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 10, 2024 10:12:06 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 26, 2017 4:49:32 GMT
Huh. I'm going to make that hungry homeless man who lives under the over-pass near me, pay for my dinner tonight... I have a $10 bill in my wallet. I was going to give the homeless man that $10 bill. Now I'm not giving him the $10 and buying my dinner with it instead. Woohoo, I made a homeless man pay for my dinner! Yeah, a free dinner for me! Is that how it works? That's beautiful, pjaye.
|
|