|
Post by Darcy Collins on Jan 9, 2018 21:35:24 GMT
In case you missed it, my post was in response to previous responses that indicated the person would apologize for their ancestors owning slaves. I don't necessarily disagree with a government apology. I disagree with reparations. The U.S. government was not the only entity involved in the slave trade. Do AA seek reparations from all countries, including African nations, that engaged in the slave trade? I don't know how all AA's feel about reparations so I can only tell you my perspective. The American government benefitted the most from chattel slavery. It would be great if African c o u n t r i e s started up something that served to reconnect African Americans to their African roots so that maybe we could do what 61redhead suggests. Great article about the real truth behind Africans and the slave trade. www.huffingtonpost.com/dwayne-wong-omowale/myths-and-misconceptions-_1_b_9637798.htmlI think it's a push between America and European countries on who benefited more from the slave trade. The Industrial Revolution was hugely dependent on both the raw materials procured through the slaves as well as the profits in slave trade. ETA this is an interesting article on the role slavery played in the Industrial Revolution: www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/abolition/industrialisation_article_01.shtml
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on Jan 9, 2018 23:36:36 GMT
Why is it up to the hurt party to find a resolution? If my ancestors had been given the 40 acres and a mule they were promised instead of being ridiculed or bombed (Rosewood Tulsa etc.) we wouldn't be having this discussion right? The government had no problem giving the Japanese 20K and I don't think they needed to submit a 12 point plan first. Again if we are allowing me to be the advocate for every descendant I've made it clear I'd prefer not paying taxes much like rich white people. Economic power shift would help end racism don't you think?
|
|
|
Post by M~ on Jan 10, 2018 23:00:13 GMT
Why is it up to the hurt party to find a resolution? If my ancestors had been given the 40 acres and a mule they were promised instead of being ridiculed or bombed (Rosewood Tulsa etc.) we wouldn't be having this discussion right? The government had no problem giving the Japanese 20K and I don't think they needed to submit a 12 point plan first. Again if we are allowing me to be the advocate for every descendant I've made it clear I'd prefer not paying taxes much like rich white people. Economic power shift would help end racism don't you think? The Civil Liberties Act of 1988 paid $20,000 to each SURVIVING victim and offered a formal apology. You aren't the hurt party of slavery; your ancestors WHO WERE SLAVES were.
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on Jan 11, 2018 14:17:47 GMT
Why is it up to the hurt party to find a resolution? If my ancestors had been given the 40 acres and a mule they were promised instead of being ridiculed or bombed (Rosewood Tulsa etc.) we wouldn't be having this discussion right? The government had no problem giving the Japanese 20K and I don't think they needed to submit a 12 point plan first. Again if we are allowing me to be the advocate for every descendant I've made it clear I'd prefer not paying taxes much like rich white people. Economic power shift would help end racism don't you think? The Civil Liberties Act of 1988 paid $20,000 to each SURVIVING victim and offered a formal apology. You aren't the hurt party of slavery; your ancestors WHO WERE SLAVES were. My ancestors weren't slaves they were enslaved. Michigan State University just received a grant. msutoday.msu.edu/news/2018/msu-uses-15m-mellon-foundation-grant-to-build-massive-slave-trade-database/
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on Jan 11, 2018 14:59:06 GMT
|
|
|
Post by wezee on Jan 11, 2018 16:41:57 GMT
Remember everyone in their live has been treated unfairly. It's how you choose to handle it that matters.
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on Jan 11, 2018 16:59:32 GMT
Remember everyone in their live has been treated unfairly. It's how you choose to handle it that matters. I can tell you clicked a link before responding.
|
|
muggins
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,861
Jul 30, 2017 3:38:57 GMT
|
Post by muggins on Jan 11, 2018 17:14:20 GMT
Remember everyone in their live has been treated unfairly. It's how you choose to handle it that matters. That’s assuming you’re still alive to handle it.
|
|
|
Post by M~ on Jan 11, 2018 20:55:41 GMT
Remember everyone in their live has been treated unfairly. It's how you choose to handle it that matters. I can tell you clicked a link before responding. I’m clicking the links but I’d much rather prefer to hear your point of view. Shrug ETA: should we just assume that every AA person has been affected in the same manner by slavery and give equal amounts of money to everyone? How far down generationally should we go? Does Oprah get as much money as you or a person living in low income housing? Where is the money going o come from? Taxpayers? And if so why? My ancestors didn’t enslave your ancestors? If we are tracing injury through the line of descrndants shouldn’t recompense come from the descendants of slave owners as well?
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on Jan 11, 2018 21:46:01 GMT
I can tell you clicked a link before responding. I’m clicking the links but I’d much rather prefer to hear your point of view. Shrug ETA: should we just assume that every AA person has been affected in the same manner by slavery and give equal amounts of money to everyone? How far down generationally should we go? Does Oprah get as much money as you or a person living in low income housing? Where is the money going o come from? Taxpayers? And if so why? My ancestors didn’t enslave your ancestors? If we are tracing injury through the line of descrndants shouldn’t recompense come from the descendants of slave owners as well? M~ I am prepared to discuss those articles. Did you see my question above regardging economic power shifting and what that might do to eradicate racism?
|
|
|
Post by M~ on Jan 11, 2018 22:29:55 GMT
I’m clicking the links but I’d much rather prefer to hear your point of view. Shrug ETA: should we just assume that every AA person has been affected in the same manner by slavery and give equal amounts of money to everyone? How far down generationally should we go? Does Oprah get as much money as you or a person living in low income housing? Where is the money going o come from? Taxpayers? And if so why? My ancestors didn’t enslave your ancestors? If we are tracing injury through the line of descrndants shouldn’t recompense come from the descendants of slave owners as well? M~ I am prepared to discuss those articles. Did you see my question above regardging economic power shifting and what that might do to eradicate racism? Well. I’m interested in your point of view. Not articles. Believe it or not, I’ve read extensively on the effects of slavery on AA. This is nothing new for me. What is *your* take in them? I did. What exactly do you mean by that?is your position that wealth eliminates racism? Why so? How come you can find racist views in people of all socioeconomic backgrounds? I’ve asked you many questions about your views on reparations. All you’ve done is linked articles. That doesn’t further any discussion to be honest.
|
|
|
Post by wezee on Jan 12, 2018 0:47:34 GMT
Remember everyone in their live has been treated unfairly. It's how you choose to handle it that matters. I can tell you clicked a link before responding. Actually I didn't.
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on Jan 12, 2018 18:23:49 GMT
M~ I am prepared to discuss those articles. Did you see my question above regardging economic power shifting and what that might do to eradicate racism? Well. I’m interested in your point of view. Not articles. Believe it or not, I’ve read extensively on the effects of slavery on AA. This is nothing new for me. What is *your* take in them? I did. What exactly do you mean by that?is your position that wealth eliminates racism? Why so? How come you can find racist views in people of all socioeconomic backgrounds? I’ve asked you many questions about your views on reparations. All you’ve done is linked articles. That doesn’t further any discussion to be honest. Olan
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on Jan 14, 2018 15:11:54 GMT
|
|
JustTricia
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,849
Location: Indianapolis
Jul 2, 2014 17:12:39 GMT
|
Post by JustTricia on Jan 14, 2018 16:18:17 GMT
I’m clicking the links but I’d much rather prefer to hear your point of view. Shrug ETA: should we just assume that every AA person has been affected in the same manner by slavery and give equal amounts of money to everyone? How far down generationally should we go? Does Oprah get as much money as you or a person living in low income housing? Where is the money going o come from? Taxpayers? And if so why? My ancestors didn’t enslave your ancestors? If we are tracing injury through the line of descrndants shouldn’t recompense come from the descendants of slave owners as well? M~ I am prepared to discuss those articles. Did you see my question above regardging economic power shifting and what that might do to eradicate racism? You may be prepared to discuss the articles, but you never do. You post links, you ask questions, you accuse with broad strokes, but you don’t discuss anything.
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on Jan 14, 2018 18:02:23 GMT
I disagree with you. I'm prepared to discuss the articles but since I'm already force feeding the board social justice issues, I can't strong arm anyone into having a discussion with me . I post links because many of the responses echoed M~ and 61redhead and/or are not fact-based. Again if someone would like to discuss ANYTHING they read in a link I've provided I'd be more than happy to. JustTricia please read through this thread, if you find an instance where I ignored someone's question or where someone made an attempt to discuss something that I overlooked please quote it. Olan I'd also be open to discussing my need to paint with broad strokes given you can actually quote ( Olan) the text where I'm "painting" or even link the thread.
|
|
|
Post by hop2 on Jan 14, 2018 18:51:17 GMT
I disagree with you. I'm prepared to discuss the articles but since I'm already force feeding the board social justice issues, I can't strong arm anyone into having a discussion with me . I post links because many of the responses echoed M~ and 61redhead and/or are not fact-based. Again if someone would like to discuss ANYTHING they read in a link I've provided I'd be more than happy to. JustTricia please read through this thread, if you find an instance where I ignored someone's question or where someone made an attempt to discuss something that I overlooked please quote it. Olan I'd also be open to discussing my need to paint with broad strokes given you can actually quote ( Olan) the text where I'm "painting" or even link the thread. Not all of your links are fact based either, some are well written opinion pieces. ( not puttng those links down, they are thoughtful pieces. They are not wrong opinions but they are opinions without research listed or linked ) But that’s not my point. I am going to agree with you though, about institutionalized racism and classism being DESIGNED to hold people back. So many opportunities in our country were/are based on already having some wealth. Or at least opportunities that are governmentally regulators in some way by licensing or other ‘applications’. Those opportunities are controlled by regulations, laws & policies and those policies were discriminatory from the start. Those policies have been sexist, racist as well as classist. I’ve stayed mostly out of this thread because Olans threads often go awry and I’m not sure why. But I’ve read this thread where over & over Olan has been told to stop whining & stop being a victim. But her point has been right all along. There are many of our laws that have been DESIGNED to exclude, to exclude on the basis of gender, race, class etc. So black women face a multiple edged sword having to overcome all of the exclusions combined. They have been generationally excluded. I don’t think any further ‘apologies’ with do anything at all. And I don’t even know how reparations would work. But at the very least we can open our eyes to how existing laws can be exclusionary and make concerted efforts to make new laws that are not. Just ask yourselves why the modest personal tax changes just passed have an automatic expiration date (5years? ) yet the corporate changes and changes that benefit the wealthy do not expire without action to repeal them specifically. Then tell me we don’t have policies designed to be exclusionary. For example the way my state ( NJ ) allows liquor licenses isn’t openly racist but may as well be. Liquor licenses by state law, made in 1947, are based on the population. A certain number of licenses per capita. While licenses are approved by each municipality the state limits the number. With some exceptions of places that had the number of licenses grandfathered by the number issued previous to the law. Making licenses in older established areas hard to come by as ‘new’ licenses aren’t being issued because they exceeded the number allowed by the state from the get go. These licenses have been a commodity for a long time whose value far far exceeds its few hundred dollar state fee. It has only recently that anything has been done to rectify these issues. The state did a similar thing with gambling in Atlantic City limiting gambling/casino licenses to those already wealthy enough to provide the other amenities required. Preventing small business owners from having so much as a slot machine in premises. Which favored only the mega wealthy, already wealthy investors. It’s the reason that Atlantic City has failed multiple times where as Las Vegas has flourished. If you think the hurdles out in place for these regulated opportunities weren’t at all race based then your fooling yourself. But at the very least you have to admit it was class based specifically favoring the already wealthy & powerful excluding others. These are admittedly my own opinions, formed by my anectdital observations, I do not have the research to back them up.
|
|
JustTricia
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,849
Location: Indianapolis
Jul 2, 2014 17:12:39 GMT
|
Post by JustTricia on Jan 14, 2018 18:52:56 GMT
I disagree with you. I'm prepared to discuss the articles but since I'm already force feeding the board social justice issues, I can't strong arm anyone into having a discussion with me . I post links because many of the responses echoed M~ and 61redhead and/or are not fact-based. Again if someone would like to discuss ANYTHING they read in a link I've provided I'd be more than happy to. JustTricia please read through this thread, if you find an instance where I ignored someone's question or where someone made an attempt to discuss something that I overlooked please quote it. Olan I'd also be open to discussing my need to paint with broad strokes given you can actually quote ( Olan) the text where I'm "painting" or even link the thread. M~ I am prepared to discuss those articles. Did you see my question above regardging economic power shifting and what that might do to eradicate racism? You may be prepared to discuss the articles, but you never do. You post links, you ask questions, you accuse with broad strokes, but you don’t discuss anything. M~ asked you Olan multiple questions. Your response to her was asking if she had seen your previous question. No discussion involved. Just replying to questions with questions. She literally said she wanted to hear your opinion.
|
|
JustTricia
Pearl Clutcher
Posts: 2,849
Location: Indianapolis
Jul 2, 2014 17:12:39 GMT
|
Post by JustTricia on Jan 14, 2018 18:54:26 GMT
I’m clicking the links but I’d much rather prefer to hear your point of view. Shrug ETA: should we just assume that every AA person has been affected in the same manner by slavery and give equal amounts of money to everyone? How far down generationally should we go? Does Oprah get as much money as you or a person living in low income housing? Where is the money going o come from? Taxpayers? And if so why? My ancestors didn’t enslave your ancestors? If we are tracing injury through the line of descrndants shouldn’t recompense come from the descendants of slave owners as well? M~ I am prepared to discuss those articles. Did you see my question above regardging economic power shifting and what that might do to eradicate racism? I’m on my phone so my previous post didn’t include this as I intended.
|
|
|
Post by Darcy Collins on Jan 14, 2018 20:32:48 GMT
I haven't had a chance to read all of the articles - but they the first two support exactly what I said that home ownership (or lack thereof) is the leading cause of wealth inequality.
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on Jan 14, 2018 22:09:15 GMT
I haven't had a chance to read all of the articles - but they the first two support exactly what I said that home ownership (or lack thereof) is the leading cause of wealth inequality. The articles support the lack of homeownership in the black community contributing to wealth inequality but no historian or anyone who read those articles would agree with you that slavery had nothing to do with that. Where in any of the facts would you find something that would suggest slavery had nothing to do with the gap in wealth? "I think you'll find very little of the current wealth disparity between races is due to to slavery. Between immigration patterns (there were tremendous numbers of immigrants post civil war) and historic events like the great depression which disrupted finances of the vast majority of people in the US at the time. " Darcy Collins
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on Jan 14, 2018 22:22:38 GMT
M~ I am prepared to discuss those articles. Did you see my question above regardging economic power shifting and what that might do to eradicate racism? I’m on my phone so my previous post didn’t include this as I intended. If you look at my responses and M~ responses you can see whats going on there. I did, in fact, entertain her line of questioning though there does come a point where actions are meant to detract from the issue instead of promote dialogue. When she ignored my response to the barrage of why's I again asked her if a shift in economic power might help in eradicating racism and thus far she has not responded. I think she asked me to rephrase it or pretended like she didn't understand what I was asking. If/when she does I will thank her for weighing and move on. This isn't an issue of one person is right and that makes the other person wrong. However, you can be wrong if your plan is to rewrite history.
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on Jan 14, 2018 22:23:42 GMT
I know you are on your phone JustTricia so don't feel compelled to find any quotes that show me painting in broad strokes. Have a nice day
|
|
|
Post by Darcy Collins on Jan 15, 2018 1:54:10 GMT
I haven't had a chance to read all of the articles - but they the first two support exactly what I said that home ownership (or lack thereof) is the leading cause of wealth inequality. The articles support the lack of homeownership in the black community contributing to wealth inequality but no historian or anyone who read those articles would agree with you that slavery had nothing to do with that. Where in any of the facts would you find something that would suggest slavery had nothing to do with the gap in wealth? "I think you'll find very little of the current wealth disparity between races is due to to slavery. Between immigration patterns (there were tremendous numbers of immigrants post civil war) and historic events like the great depression which disrupted finances of the vast majority of people in the US at the time. " Darcy Collins There's a significant difference between "very little" and "nothing to do with" - I have no interest in supporting something I never said.
|
|
|
Post by M~ on Jan 15, 2018 20:18:10 GMT
I’m on my phone so my previous post didn’t include this as I intended. If you look at my responses and M~ responses you can see whats going on there. I did, in fact, entertain her line of questioning though there does come a point where actions are meant to detract from the issue instead of promote dialogue. When she ignored my response to the barrage of why's I again asked her if a shift in economic power might help in eradicating racism and thus far she has not responded. I think she asked me to rephrase it or pretended like she didn't understand what I was asking. If/when she does I will thank her for weighing and move on. This isn't an issue of one person is right and that makes the other person wrong. However, you can be wrong if your plan is to rewrite history. Omg. This is hilarious. Let me be blunt- if you think that linking opinion pieces instead of actually voicing your opinion like other people have tried to elicit from you is “ discussion” and then turning around and then blaming others for “ not understanding you, then I feel sorry for you. If my professors had asked me to articulate an opinion and I linked an article instead of articulating my thoughts, I’d get a F. Have at it. Be the angry all knowing black person. Eyeroll.
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on Jan 15, 2018 20:30:11 GMT
If you look at my responses and M~ responses you can see whats going on there. I did, in fact, entertain her line of questioning though there does come a point where actions are meant to detract from the issue instead of promote dialogue. When she ignored my response to the barrage of why's I again asked her if a shift in economic power might help in eradicating racism and thus far she has not responded. I think she asked me to rephrase it or pretended like she didn't understand what I was asking. If/when she does I will thank her for weighing and move on. This isn't an issue of one person is right and that makes the other person wrong. However, you can be wrong if your plan is to rewrite history. Omg. This is hilarious. Let me be blunt- if you think that linking opinion pieces instead of actually voicing your opinion like other people have tried to elicit from you is “ discussion” and then turning around and then blaming others for “ not understanding you, then I feel sorry for you. If my professors had asked me to articulate an opinion and I linked an article instead of articulating my thoughts, I’d get a F. Have at it. Be the angry all knowing black person. Eyeroll. Does anyone think the way M~ tried to elicit a response from me was antagonizing and/or rude? Why or why not? Does anyone see a question from M~ that Olan left unanswered? What about my response was angry or all knowing?
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on Jan 15, 2018 20:32:09 GMT
The articles support the lack of homeownership in the black community contributing to wealth inequality but no historian or anyone who read those articles would agree with you that slavery had nothing to do with that. Where in any of the facts would you find something that would suggest slavery had nothing to do with the gap in wealth? "I think you'll find very little of the current wealth disparity between races is due to to slavery. Between immigration patterns (there were tremendous numbers of immigrants post civil war) and historic events like the great depression which disrupted finances of the vast majority of people in the US at the time. " Darcy Collins There's a significant difference between "very little" and "nothing to do with" - I have no interest in supporting something I never said. Olan Darcy Collins Have you ever read anything that supports your argument of "very little"? Are you sticking by your original comment?
|
|
|
Post by Darcy Collins on Jan 15, 2018 21:24:23 GMT
There's a significant difference between "very little" and "nothing to do with" - I have no interest in supporting something I never said. Olan Darcy Collins Have you ever read anything that supports your argument of "very little"? Are you sticking by your original comment? Considering your links actually support my comment absolutely. I suggest you reread the links you posted: My comment: As the majority of American's wealth is tied up in real estate ownership and has been for several generations, I imagine housing segregation and discriminatory lending practices have had a much bigger role in the current wealth disparity.
|
|
Olan
Pearl Clutcher
Enter your message here...
Posts: 4,053
Jul 13, 2014 21:23:27 GMT
|
Post by Olan on Jan 15, 2018 21:33:55 GMT
Olan Darcy Collins Have you ever read anything that supports your argument of "very little"? Are you sticking by your original comment? Considering your links actually support my comment absolutely. I suggest you reread the links you posted: My comment: As the majority of American's wealth is tied up in real estate ownership and has been for several generations, I imagine housing segregation and discriminatory lending practices have had a much bigger role in the current wealth disparity. So you are sticking by your original comment that slavery has very little to do with the gap in wealth? And insisting that I re-read the articles because they support your argument. *shocked* I responded to: Darcy Collins As the majority of American's wealth is tied up in real estate ownership and has been for several generations, I imagine housing segregation and discriminatory lending practices have had a much bigger role in the current wealth disparity. Gentrification is the new colonization and no one would have to take a DNA test for that small bit of change to occur. Your mind is made up. Facts be damned. Have a nice MLK day
|
|
|
Post by Darcy Collins on Jan 15, 2018 21:48:43 GMT
Considering your links actually support my comment absolutely. I suggest you reread the links you posted: My comment: As the majority of American's wealth is tied up in real estate ownership and has been for several generations, I imagine housing segregation and discriminatory lending practices have had a much bigger role in the current wealth disparity. So you are sticking by your original comment that slavery has very little to do with the gap in wealth? And insisting that I re-read the articles because they support your argument. *shocked* I responded to: Darcy Collins As the majority of American's wealth is tied up in real estate ownership and has been for several generations, I imagine housing segregation and discriminatory lending practices have had a much bigger role in the current wealth disparity. Gentrification is the new colonization and no one would have to take a DNA test for that small bit of change to occur. Your mind is made up. Facts be damned. Have a nice MLK day Only you would ask someone to read a 44 page document on wealth disparity - which never once mentions slavery but DOES point out that the majority of the disparity is do to home ownership (which was the point I made) and say facts be damned. Don't pretend you want a discussion. I do thank you for finding some quantitative numbers for my point.
|
|