|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 28, 2021 18:25:48 GMT
Rational discussions can easily happen when you don't trash someone when there are no facts to dispute what they're saying. I guess you will never, ever get tired of being proven wrong but still stolidly repeating the same nonsense over and over again. Cuz maybe we’ll fall for it *this* time. Calling me names is not proving me wrong. That's not how that works.
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Oct 28, 2021 18:33:06 GMT
I was just reading updates on the latest cluster that is Congress. I think the presidency is a tough job and have been in favor of age limits since Reagan. I think Biden is a decent, hardworking, president who truly cares about our country. But he's way out of his depth as the head of the Democratic Party. As much as people want to bitch about the Republicans, his own party is doing him no favors. And it's more than just Manchin and Sinema - the progressives never should have held up the Infrastructure bill for leverage on the spending bill. Now they just look like they can't govern - and it's not a good look heading into 2022. I don't know who could actually get the party to pull in the same direction with some kind of discipline, but they better find that person fast as the midterms are going to be a disaster and it does not bode well for 2024 which will be here so damn early as our presidential primary/races are FOREVER - and I for one have absolutely no interest in Trump v2. Something I’ve been thinking about all morning as I have the news on in the background…why is all of the focus on democrats and their governing”? Why are the republicans let off the hook here in regards to getting bills passed?
|
|
|
Post by iamkristinl16 on Oct 28, 2021 18:35:14 GMT
Give me a f$ing break. Many of these parents at school board meetings ARE rabid and appear to be mentally unstable. Just because they are parents does not mean that they aren’t held to normal standards in society, or that they aren’t capable of bad behavior.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 2:57:37 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2021 18:40:03 GMT
I guess you will never, ever get tired of being proven wrong but still stolidly repeating the same nonsense over and over again. Cuz maybe we’ll fall for it *this* time. Calling me names is not proving me wrong. That's not how that works. There was no name-calling in the quoted text from Lucy.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 28, 2021 18:48:07 GMT
Calling me names is not proving me wrong. That's not how that works. There was no name-calling in the quoted text from Lucy. She called me a troll and a frother today and the other day. And she's not the only who resorts to name calling when they have no facts to refute facts they don't like.
|
|
|
Post by lucyg on Oct 28, 2021 19:09:58 GMT
There was no name-calling in the quoted text from Lucy. She called me a troll and a frother today and the other day. And she's not the only who resorts to name calling when they have no facts to refute facts they don't like. I do not believe I have called you a troll at any time in this thread or anywhere else in the recent past. Not going to claim it has never, ever happened, but certainly not lately. ETA I have a vague recollection of saying you had to be trolling us, based upon your posting style, at some point in the past. Describing your posting style as “frothing” is not the same thing as calling you a frother. It describes actions, not people. Not sure if there’s much of a distinction, but since you’re so determined to accuse me of name-calling, at least be accurate about it. And I, and many others, have provided you with actual facts, data, and reliable sources many times over (probably thousands of times, at this point), which you continue to ignore and just keep posting the same disproved right-wing talking points over and over again, alongside a few vague, dispirited actual facts that may or may not be of any real relevance to the discussion. And then you have the nerve to accuse me (inaccurately) of name-calling because I supposedly can’t produce facts? Just no. That is patently ridiculous. <— still not name calling, but factual, based on the evidence before our eyes
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 28, 2021 19:36:19 GMT
She called me a troll and a frother today and the other day. And she's not the only who resorts to name calling when they have no facts to refute facts they don't like. I do not believe I have called you a troll at any time in this thread or anywhere else in the recent past. Not going to claim it has never, ever happened, but certainly not lately. ETA I have a vague recollection of saying you had to be trolling us, based upon your posting style, at some point in the past. Describing your posting style as “frothing” is not the same thing as calling you a frother. It describes actions, not people. Not sure if there’s much of a distinction, but since you’re so determined to accuse me of name-calling, at least be accurate about it. And I, and many others, have provided you with actual facts, data, and reliable sources many times over (probably thousands of times, at this point), which you continue to ignore and just keep posting the same disproved right-wing talking points over and over again, alongside a few vague, dispirited actual facts that may or may not be of any real relevance to the discussion. And then you have the nerve to accuse me (inaccurately) of name-calling because I supposedly can’t produce facts? Just no. That is patently ridiculous. <— still not name calling, but factual, based on the evidence before our eyes You applied the sealioning troll definition in response to me the other day. You did it again today and tagged me so I wouldn't miss it. The frothing notation said TO me is a personal attack and no amount of semantics will change that. I and many others would really love to discuss topics here. How about if you let people disagree with you and realize that if you come back with another response, that they can too? Without deserving a personal attack for not just sitting down and shutting up because "you" spoke. Especially when they back up their statements with facts. Certain people think that "we have told you" is a valid proof of their position. It isn't. This is supposed to be a back and forth.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Oct 28, 2021 19:40:27 GMT
Of course not. He's aging - like all of us. Was TFG's shuffling and two-handed drinking "normal for him"?
Yes! That's what people are saying. And he's visibly mentally declining as he does. Which affects his ability to run a country. The key is Biden's policies and his execution and his care for Americans. Biden's policies suck. His execution sucks. His care for Americans suck. He's divisive. He's pitting part of the country against the other part. Again…where were you the last administration when TFG fucked over everyone who didn’t kiss his ring?
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Oct 28, 2021 19:43:47 GMT
But Texas (and now more southern states) and many republicans (men and women)say rape is okay-that women should just relax and go with it…that it’s gods plan… Your “concern” is fucking ridiculous—where is your outrage at children being murdered in schools, what TFG did that Biden’s hands were tied regarding Afghanistan?? Typical hypocrites.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Oct 28, 2021 19:44:37 GMT
"He's divisive. He's pitting part of the country against the other part." Rich coming from someone who adored the president who has been the most divisive president in my adult lifetime. Thanks for the laugh. I needed that today. I know, right!!! The hypocrisy is so far out there…
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Oct 28, 2021 19:46:53 GMT
Nope He may be PHYSICALLY declining. Where do you get "mentally declining"? Oh, right out of your hindquarters.
I'll leave your observations of Biden alone as you're showing your true colors and those w/common decency can see them brightly.
Thanks.
I've shown enough examples by now for you to realize what a dumb question that is. And noticing that the president may not really be capable of running a country at this point is not indecent in the slightest. That's a national security threat. You’re here solely to try to rile up anyone not a trumper. You don’t ever want discussion, you want to spew your limited vision echo chamber. You are a true Trumpster to the core.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Oct 28, 2021 19:50:02 GMT
I do not believe I have called you a troll at any time in this thread or anywhere else in the recent past. Not going to claim it has never, ever happened, but certainly not lately. ETA I have a vague recollection of saying you had to be trolling us, based upon your posting style, at some point in the past. Describing your posting style as “frothing” is not the same thing as calling you a frother. It describes actions, not people. Not sure if there’s much of a distinction, but since you’re so determined to accuse me of name-calling, at least be accurate about it. And I, and many others, have provided you with actual facts, data, and reliable sources many times over (probably thousands of times, at this point), which you continue to ignore and just keep posting the same disproved right-wing talking points over and over again, alongside a few vague, dispirited actual facts that may or may not be of any real relevance to the discussion. And then you have the nerve to accuse me (inaccurately) of name-calling because I supposedly can’t produce facts? Just no. That is patently ridiculous. <— still not name calling, but factual, based on the evidence before our eyes You applied the sealioning troll definition in response to me the other day. You did it again today and tagged me so I wouldn't miss it. The frothing notation said TO me is a personal attack and no amount of semantics will change that. I and many others would really love to discuss topics here. How about if you let people disagree with you and realize that if you come back with another response, that they can too? Without deserving a personal attack for not just sitting down and shutting up because "you" spoke. Especially when they back up their statements with facts. Certain people think that "we have told you" is a valid proof of their position. It isn't. This is supposed to be a back and forth. Oh please. You do it all the time.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 2:57:37 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2021 19:50:10 GMT
There was no name-calling in the quoted text from Lucy. She called me a troll and a frother today and the other day. And she's not the only who resorts to name calling when they have no facts to refute facts they don't like. I'll happily call you names. Trump-humper. Liar. Troll. Gia. Cult member. You do not deserve my respect. I don't give a fuck about you.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 2:57:37 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2021 19:53:59 GMT
There was no name-calling in the quoted text from Lucy. She called me a troll and a frother today and the other day. And she's not the only who resorts to name calling when they have no facts to refute facts they don't like. No one should be called a name.
You do have a habit of posting opinions w/o or w/disreputable sources.
Do better.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Oct 28, 2021 19:54:05 GMT
And we will continue to not take you seriously. Because honestly, it has nothing to do with his condition and everything to do with your frothing about politics. I adore you Lucy so please know this is me genuinely asking in general…but there are frothers on both sides. That is what is so frustrating to me as a middle voter on this board. There aren’t discussions taking place because the lefts won’t concede their problems and the right doesn’t concede their problems. Instead it is just each side railing on the other side. Why can’t discussions take place anymore? This is an outright lie. The “lefts” are not the ones putting out election lies, conspiracy theories, obstructing or planning insurrections. The “lefts” absolutely are critical of their own, it’s the republicans who are sheep blindly following the lies being spewed by a bunch of religious zealot, corrupt politicians who do nothing on a daily basis except for divisive actions. Republicans OWN confirmation bias.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 2:57:37 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2021 19:55:28 GMT
do not believe I have called you a troll at any time in this thread or anywhere else in the recent past. Not going to claim it has never, ever happened, but certainly not lately. ETA I have a vague recollection of saying you had to be trolling us, based upon your posting style, at some point in the past. Describing your posting style as “frothing” is not the same thing as calling you a frother. It's amazing to me that people don't know the difference between calling something "trolling" - describing AN ACTION and calling someONE "a troll" - AN ADHOMINEM. It is perfectly ok to label actions and behaviors. It is not ok to call people names based on those actions - even if they do them 80-100% of the time.
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Oct 28, 2021 20:15:51 GMT
As soon as you’re willing to admit that you couldn’t care less about Trump’s obvious disabilities, while trying to convince us that Biden’s perceived issues are disqualifying, I will lose interest in what you refer to as “personal attacks.” Trump needing two hands to lift a glass of water to his mouth, That's physical, not mental.and a general to hold his arm as they walked slowly down a very slightly sloped ramp, which he later described as “running.” Also physical, not mental.Let’s hear your mockery of the time he got off AF1 and then walked right past the car that was waiting for him with open door at the foot of the stairs and wandered off aimlessly. Secret Service had to go get him and redirect him to the car. Could be mental.How about that time he wouldn’t let go of French President Macron’s hand for pretty much forever? Awkwardly trying to be personable. That's something I wouldn't be surprised to see from him no matter his age.
I've seen nothing from Trump that would compare to what we've seen from Biden in the last year and half. If there is actually anything I wouldn't automatically dismiss it and trash someone for pointing it out. And as for the here and now, it's Biden running the country, not Trump. Delusional in your Biden trump comparison. 🙄🙄🙄
|
|
|
Post by papercrafteradvocate on Oct 28, 2021 20:16:11 GMT
|
|
|
Post by revirdsuba99 on Oct 28, 2021 20:21:15 GMT
I guess you will never, ever get tired of being proven wrong but still stolidly repeating the same nonsense over and over again. Cuz maybe we’ll fall for it *this* time. Calling me names is not proving me wrong. That's not how that works. I see no name calling by lucyg here!!
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Oct 28, 2021 20:22:54 GMT
We should all be pissed that these are our only choices. And one more thing. These were our only choices because they were the two our primary voters chose to represent us. They didn’t start out being our only choices, at least not on the Democratic side. So you can be pissed off that your guy/gal didn’t win the nomination, but stop acting as if Biden was forced down the voters’ throats. He wasn’t. We chose him. I agree that Biden was the Democrats choice and now is not the time to complain that he's not the right Democrat. On the other hand, as someone who lives in NH with the first primary, something needs to change. Our state is about 97% white and not representative of the country. Our votes should not be more important in a primary than someone from CT or New Jersey.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 28, 2021 20:24:02 GMT
She called me a troll and a frother today and the other day. And she's not the only who resorts to name calling when they have no facts to refute facts they don't like. No one should be called a name.
You do have a habit of posting opinions w/o or w/disreputable sources.
Do better.
No actually, I don't. Very recently, so many of my sources have been Democrats or Left leaning media, specifically to avoid your characterization above. It's amazing to me that people don't know the difference between calling something "trolling" - describing AN ACTION and calling someONE "a troll" - AN ADHOMINEM. It is perfectly ok to label actions and behaviors. It is not ok to call people names based on those actions - even if they do them 80-100% of the time. It doesn't matter if you call it labeling or attacking. The objective for doing either is to shut down opposing discussion.
|
|
|
Post by mollycoddle on Oct 28, 2021 20:25:28 GMT
I adore you Lucy so please know this is me genuinely asking in general…but there are frothers on both sides. That is what is so frustrating to me as a middle voter on this board. There aren’t discussions taking place because the lefts won’t concede their problems and the right doesn’t concede their problems. Instead it is just each side railing on the other side. Why can’t discussions take place anymore? This is an outright lie. The “lefts” are not the ones putting out election lies, conspiracy theories, obstructing or planning insurrections. The “lefts” absolutely are critical of their own, it’s the republicans who are sheep blindly following the lies being spewed by a bunch of religious zealot, corrupt politicians who do nothing on a daily basis except for divisive actions. Republicans OWN confirmation bias. This. Supporting Trump while he lied about who won the election. Congressional Rs have little interest in getting to the bottom of wtf happened on January 6th. Of course R obstructionism in Congress-Mitch is famous for it. Avoiding or lying about the benefits of the Covid vaccine. And they will probably support Trump again in 2024. This is alarming on so many levels. Look, I am unhappy at the moment with the Congressional Dems; it’s like trying to herd cats. Having said that, most of them do tend to put country over party, which is not something that I can say about Republicans at the moment. I am terrified of letting Republicans back in charge, esp with Trump as President. So I am voting D for the foreseeable future.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 24, 2024 2:57:37 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2021 20:26:46 GMT
No one should be called a name.
You do have a habit of posting opinions w/o or w/disreputable sources.
Do better.
No actually, I don't. Very recently, so many of my sources have been Democrats or Left leaning media, specifically to avoid your characterization above. It's amazing to me that people don't know the difference between calling something "trolling" - describing AN ACTION and calling someONE "a troll" - AN ADHOMINEM. It is perfectly ok to label actions and behaviors. It is not ok to call people names based on those actions - even if they do them 80-100% of the time. It doesn't matter if you call it labeling or attacking. The objective for doing either is to shut down opposing discussion. No. The objective for labeling behavior is to point out the behavior's characteristics to the perpetrator of the behavior and to bystanders.
The objective the calling names is to shut down opposing discussion.
Learn the difference.
|
|
|
Post by lucyg on Oct 28, 2021 20:29:12 GMT
I do not believe I have called you a troll at any time in this thread or anywhere else in the recent past. Not going to claim it has never, ever happened, but certainly not lately. ETA I have a vague recollection of saying you had to be trolling us, based upon your posting style, at some point in the past. Describing your posting style as “frothing” is not the same thing as calling you a frother. It describes actions, not people. Not sure if there’s much of a distinction, but since you’re so determined to accuse me of name-calling, at least be accurate about it. And I, and many others, have provided you with actual facts, data, and reliable sources many times over (probably thousands of times, at this point), which you continue to ignore and just keep posting the same disproved right-wing talking points over and over again, alongside a few vague, dispirited actual facts that may or may not be of any real relevance to the discussion. And then you have the nerve to accuse me (inaccurately) of name-calling because I supposedly can’t produce facts? Just no. That is patently ridiculous. <— still not name calling, but factual, based on the evidence before our eyes You applied the sealioning troll definition in response to me the other day. You did it again today and tagged me so I wouldn't miss it. The frothing notation said TO me is a personal attack and no amount of semantics will change that. I and many others would really love to discuss topics here. How about if you let people disagree with you and realize that if you come back with another response, that they can too? Without deserving a personal attack for not just sitting down and shutting up because "you" spoke. Especially when they back up their statements with facts. Certain people think that "we have told you" is a valid proof of their position. It isn't. This is supposed to be a back and forth. I have gone through over two weeks of my posts, and it shows that I posted the “sealioning” link in the vaccine mandates thread two weeks ago. I posted it again yesterday, I believe in the same thread. At no time did I call you a troll, and I did not post it at all in this thread. What I did find in that review, though, is a perfect example of exactly what I’ve been saying about both your posts and mine. Go back and reread that vaccine mandates thread. It is full of you posting the same unsubstantiated claims, which we refute with links to legitimate sources such as the CDC, and then you continue to post the same claims, slightly reworded, over and over again. We post the same responses, sometimes with more substantiation, and you claim we aren’t answering your questions, and ask again. THAT is how you ended up with the “sealioning” link in that thread. No one expects you to accept our opinions just because they’re our opinions. We give you evidence for our claims, you insist there are multiple studies to refute them, but you either refuse to supply links, or give us ONE, and it is dated, limited, and has been cast in doubt. I wouldn’t even insist that your POV will never be validated, it may be eventually, but so far it hasn’t been, and no matter how many times you claim no one has answered your question … yes, it has been answered, with legitimate, authoritative studies to back us up. You just don’t want to accept it. All righty then. But don’t be surprised that very few people agree with you or accept your claims.
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Oct 28, 2021 20:29:59 GMT
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Oct 28, 2021 20:37:01 GMT
Nope He may be PHYSICALLY declining. Where do you get "mentally declining"? Oh, right out of your hindquarters.
I'll leave your observations of Biden alone as you're showing your true colors and those w/common decency can see them brightly.
Thanks.
I've shown enough examples by now for you to realize what a dumb question that is. And noticing that the president may not really be capable of running a country at this point is not indecent in the slightest. That's a national security threat. If you're concerned about national security, where are your posts with concerns about national security when former was president? He incited an insurrection. How's that for a threat to national security? He was so unhinged, General Milley had a conversation with Nancy Pelosi and Chinese diplomats. And the $400 million dollar loan that he took out from a foreign bank? Owing such an enormous sum of money is a huge threat to national security. He embraced white supremacy. Domestic terrorism and white supremacy are serious threats to national security. There are about a million ways and a million examples of how he was a threat to national security. Your concerns now for national security ring false.
|
|
|
Post by Laurie on Oct 28, 2021 20:39:46 GMT
I long for those days of real, nitty gritty thought provoking discussions were taking place. They still are. There are plenty of peas discussing and backing assertions w/reputable sources. Again, my example above shows that I and others are fine w/acknowledging issues even where we are in agreement w/overall direction or approach. I try not to call out people (ad hominems), but I do call out opinions and actions as stupid or uninformed or vapid or.... I find I can have discussions w/peas who believe differently, as long as they back their beliefs w/data, evidence that is reputable and/or peer-reviewed. I wonder if you stop to really read and consider. Or do you lump it all in w/"frothing". If the post is not about backing up the opinion or giving arguments as to why they feel the way that they do then I am not bothering reading it because it is not adding value to the discussion. I love to hear why people believe what they do on an issue and/or passionate about a political issue. I love having my ideology challenged so at the very least I can understand the opposite perspective. Having a better understanding of both sides makes me feel more informed.
|
|
|
Post by aj2hall on Oct 28, 2021 20:43:11 GMT
And we will continue to not take you seriously. Because honestly, it has nothing to do with his condition and everything to do with your frothing about politics. I adore you Lucy so please know this is me genuinely asking in general…but there are frothers on both sides. That is what is so frustrating to me as a middle voter on this board. There aren’t discussions taking place because the lefts won’t concede their problems and the right doesn’t concede their problems. Instead it is just each side railing on the other side. Why can’t discussions take place anymore? If anyone wants to have a serious, rational discussion, I think many liberals on the board would be willing to debate real issues. Many of us do not take pixiechick seriously because she posts false equivalencies, false comparisons and uses a lot of other Republican tactics. She's deliberately obtuse, refuses to acknowledge when she's wrong, she claims lots of things but never backs them up with facts, I could go on forever. Just look at the recent thread on vaccine mandates. Many of us tried to point out there's a difference between acquired immunity and immunity from the vaccines. She just ignored those posts and kept arguing. Our frustration with her isn't just from this thread, its from her history.
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Oct 28, 2021 20:44:08 GMT
I have gone through over two weeks of my posts, and it shows that I posted the “sealioning” link in the vaccine mandates thread two weeks ago. I posted it again yesterday, I believe in the same thread. At no time did I call you a troll, and I did not post it at all in this thread. Sealioning is a type of troll? You were referring to me when mentioning sealioning? What I did find in that review, though, is a perfect example of exactly what I’ve been saying about both your posts and mine. Go back and reread that vaccine mandates thread. It is full of you posting the same unsubstantiated claims, which we refute with links to legitimate sources such as the CDC, and then you continue to post the same claims, slightly reworded, over and over again. We post the same responses, sometimes with more substantiation, and you claim we aren’t answering your questions, and ask again. So, despite your tying up "your" actions up with a silk bow and throwing garbage on my actions, we are all doing the same thing and we both feel justified in doing so. No one expects you to accept our opinions just because they’re our opinions. We give you evidence for our claims, you insist there are multiple studies to refute them, but you either refuse to supply links, or give us ONE, and it is dated, limited, and has been cast in doubt. I wouldn’t even insist that your POV will never be validated, it may be eventually, but so far it hasn’t been, and no matter how many times you claim no one has answered your question … yes, it has been answered, with legitimate, authoritative studies to back us up. You just don’t want to accept it. All righty then. But don’t be surprised that very few people agree with you or accept your claims. About the vaccine mandates, "I don't think companies should be inserting themselves into their employees' medical decisions at all." pretty much sums up how I feel.
|
|
|
Post by spottiedottie on Oct 28, 2021 20:44:44 GMT
Just because someone has qualms/questions/criticisms of Joe Biden doesn't make them a rabid Trump supporter, as many on this board insist. It's possible for someone to dislike Trump and also be able to see Biden's issues at the same time.
Biden's poll numbers are tanking. Fivethirtyeight.com has his disapproval at 51% today. Those are horrible numbers and the DNC knows it. 51% means there are Biden voters who disapprove of the job he's doing. There's no good way to spin that.
Virginia is a blue state that Biden won by over 10 points a year ago. Now, Terry McAuliffe is running for governor again and just a few weeks ago was expected to win easily. Now it looks like the Republican has a good shot. Biden is bringing the whole party down. I really think the Dems are going to lose big in the mid-terms and Biden will be largely responsible for it.
ETA: 2 weeks ago the polls in Virginia showed McAuliffe ahead by 52 to 41. Today it's 47.6 to 46.1, just a 1.5% difference. And that's AFTER Obama and Biden campaigned for McAuliffe.
|
|