|
|
Post by pixiechick on Jul 12, 2022 14:13:51 GMT
Keep knocking Biden, you will suffer the wrath of former, and see how much he does for you! You could see that as your last vote for president,! I think it's time to be honest about Biden. It wouldn't surprise me at all, if he isn't able to finish his term without it becoming absolutely undeniable to everyone. And no Trump. He needs to move on. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Jul 12, 2022 3:41:08 GMT
I think we're having 2 different conversations here. I was not talking about abortion. I was simply referring to Dana Perino referring to protesting outside a judge's home or the court, being illegal. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Jul 12, 2022 2:26:46 GMT
I seem to remember former carrying cheat sheets too and he was younger at the time... Notes on topics to discuss is vastly different than needing reminders of basic functions: (1. YOU walk in room and say hello. 2. YOU sit down in YOUR chair. 3. YOU speak. 4. YOU ask question.) |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Jul 12, 2022 2:10:05 GMT
Do you have a link to that info? She's speaking specifically to Title 18, Section 1507, of the U.S. Code. The law states that it is illegal, “with the intent of influencing any judge,” to: picket or parade “in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer” “or with such intent,” to resort “to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence” From the Washington PostIt is your link!! Can you quote what in that article supports your statement: "Decision was already made on false information!!" |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Jul 12, 2022 1:37:28 GMT
What decision are you speaking of? Your claim the attempt to influence kavanaugh et al. Do you have a link to that info? |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Jul 12, 2022 0:51:33 GMT
Decision was already made on false information!! What decision are you speaking of? |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Jul 11, 2022 23:57:49 GMT
Really? Yeah right. Dimwit. She's speaking specifically to Title 18, Section 1507, of the U.S. Code. The law states that it is illegal, “with the intent of influencing any judge,” to: picket or parade “in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer” “or with such intent,” to resort “to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence” From the Washington Post |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Jul 11, 2022 17:19:47 GMT
 Yay! Babies AND a wedding.  That was our year last year. The good part, anyway. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Jul 11, 2022 16:59:55 GMT
Short, curved top squovals.
|
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Jul 11, 2022 16:24:56 GMT
Well, with the beginning of the incident not included in the video, we don't know if the police tried resolving it peacefully, or not. According to her mother who was with her at the time of the arrest, the police did not try to resolve it before arresting her. It seems like you have a personal mission to defend every conservative politician or law enforcement officer. Some of them are absolutely despicable and don't deserve defending. Police officers resorting to arresting a 13 year old peaceful protesting doesn't seem worthy of defense. Sometimes I think you're just looking to pick fights with the liberals. As I said, I'm pro-choice. I'm also for peacefully protesting. If this girl is being arrested for peacefully, lawfully protesting and not something else, I'll stand right beside you in demanding justice for her. With the beginning of the incident not included in the video, we don't know if the police tried resolving it peacefully, or not. As in, I'd like to see what actually happened and decide for myself as opposed to taking the police or the protester's word for it. That's not controversial and should be okay to say. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Jul 10, 2022 20:40:12 GMT
Someone in the family was exposed to covid and had to quarantine. At the end of quarantine they tested negative. So nice to read everyone's good news.  |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Jul 8, 2022 23:09:35 GMT
You know, I wasn't going to bring up all the times you do that, because really this has nothing to do with that. At all. BUT you keep saying things like this and seem to be enjoying painting me as a monster for doing it and making it out that it shows something wrong with ME because I answered in a way you could use in that way. You either have no self awareness or you think it's okay for you and not anyone else. There have been many times you do it, but the most jolting was last year on my thread link
Why is it okay for you, but something is wrong with me if I do it? No. If that were the case, they'd block you. The reason they block me is because I have the wrong opinion, facts that don't support some claims, won't sit down and shut up when told to. And mostly because of hundreds of posts like yours that paint me as a monster and something is wrong with me. This one just happens to blatantly come right out and say it. I'M not the monster here. Read my posts again, this time without your bigoted bias. I jumped down no one's throat. Not even now when you stooped SO low down and dirty. Where in the hell did you see me say such a thing? You’re absolutely delusional, Gia, making yourself out to be a victim all the time. I initially responded to you at all against my better judgement and now I’m done. Have a nice life as I won’t be wasting a single second of precious time on you again. Great! Then I can participate more on topic and less with this kind of crap. Perfect for all. I'm not delusional, that's nothing but a smear when you have to look at your hypocrisy. And calling out your bullshit doesn't make me a victim. Just another smear from you. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Jul 8, 2022 17:08:51 GMT
Oh my God! I did not respond to that. I have never seen that. That was NOT on your OP or any of your posts that followed. I read the picture you provided. It was enough to get your point across, I didn't see the need to clicked on it, so I clicked on it now and I still don't see that post you're telling me I responded to. WTH is wrong with you that you continually have to paint me as a monster. And with things that aren't even true. Why can't you just talk and discuss like a normal person? Why is it so hard for you to accept or even just walk away from someone that has a different opinion? Why do you go to such lengths to demonize opposing opinion or even facts? And why the hell do people support this? I posted a link to the thread and pointed out that the responses were also interesting. These were the first two links in the thread. I mentioned the *thread* in several subsequent posts and asked you point blank if you’d read it. You couldn’t be bothered to click though and read what I was bringing up; instead you had to jump on the comment at the end and make assumptions out of context about what I was saying. I don’t think I’m the one who can’t have a normal conversation. There is something wrong with YOU. Always looking for the way in which you are supposedly persecuted instead of actually reading what people are saying. Re: accepting and walking away. You posted here on a thread I started, didn’t bother to read the linked thread, and then jumped down our throats about what you assumed the point to be. Look in the mirror and take your own advice. You are too self-absorbed and narrow-minded to have anything approaching a normal conversation. That’s why people here block you. And why the hell would any sane person “accept” that it’s OK to punish innocent women and children because you hate liberals? That’s not a difference of opinion. That’s just wrong. instead you had to jump on the comment at the end and make assumptions out of context about what I was saying. I don’t think I’m the one who can’t have a normal conversation. There is something wrong with YOU. You know, I wasn't going to bring up all the times you do that, because really this has nothing to do with that. At all. BUT you keep saying things like this and seem to be enjoying painting me as a monster for doing it and making it out that it shows something wrong with ME because I answered in a way you could use in that way. You either have no self awareness or you think it's okay for you and not anyone else. There have been many times you do it, but the most jolting was last year on my thread link
Why is it okay for you, but something is wrong with me if I do it? You are too self-absorbed and narrow-minded to have anything approaching a normal conversation. That’s why people here block you. No. If that were the case, they'd block you. The reason they block me is because I have the wrong opinion, facts that don't support some claims, won't sit down and shut up when told to. And mostly because of hundreds of posts like yours that paint me as a monster and something is wrong with me. This one just happens to blatantly come right out and say it. I'M not the monster here. then jumped down our throats about what you assumed the point to be. Read my posts again, this time without your bigoted bias. I jumped down no one's throat. Not even now when you stooped SO low down and dirty. And why the hell would any sane person “accept” that it’s OK to punish innocent women and children because you hate liberals? That’s not a difference of opinion. That’s just wrong. Where in the hell did you see me say such a thing? |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Jul 8, 2022 2:20:30 GMT
I would like to know what kind of heartless monster you have to be to offhandedly claim that "there's a catalyst for everything" in response to a tweet that casually justifies a 10 year old girl being required to bear her rapist's child because liberals were mean. Did anyone actually read the thread I posted?? Or was that just too much damn trouble in the face of looking for one more chance to own the libs? A 10 year old is an acceptable casualty to these people and we're told "there's a catalyst for everything." JFC. Don't ask why people block you when that is your heartless and brainless response. But why should we be surprised, when the response of the right to school shootings of 9 and 10 year olds is to post memes about how they lubricate their AR-15s with liberal tears (or worse). They're willing to make children pay for the supposed sins of liberals. Oh my God! I did not respond to that. I have never seen that. That was NOT on your OP or any of your posts that followed. I read the picture you provided. It was enough to get your point across, I didn't see the need to clicked on it, so I clicked on it now and I still don't see that post you're telling me I responded to. WTH is wrong with you that you continually have to paint me as a monster. And with things that aren't even true. Why can't you just talk and discuss like a normal person? Why is it so hard for you to accept or even just walk away from someone that has a different opinion? Why do you go to such lengths to demonize opposing opinion or even facts? And why the hell do people support this? |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Jul 8, 2022 2:10:54 GMT
Oh I see. Double standards. It's OK for conservatives to use whataboutisms but you object when liberals do it. Any whataboutism is OK if you're conservative but what about Trump is unacceptable. Got it. Just stop. Really. I'm not the one that has a problem with whataboutism, only that I got hand slapped for doing it last year and now you all suddenly have no problem doing it and you want to turn it back on me now. This a link to ALL of my posts with "whataboutism" mentioned. Scroll all the way to the bottom and see who started all of this whataboutism BS. It wasn't me. It was you. link
Why can't you just have a normal conversation? Like a normal human being? |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Jul 7, 2022 20:00:58 GMT
I have this poster blocked, so I had to go back and look at the post, to see what was linked. Talk about spreadsheet-keeping, man... to link a thread from Fall, 2020? Geez. really?!? Blocking people that don't agree with you. hmmmm It's not spreadsheet keeping to link it -when you're the one that wrote it. You could've agreed with Lucy without the personal swipe, especially since it wasn't even true. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Jul 7, 2022 18:32:57 GMT
Just one example out of hundreds? thousands?: linkSo this is the best you can come up with? Seriously? He was right in that the focus should stay on the stunt McConnell pulled with trump’s third pick, especially after he denied President Obama his right to fill a vacancy on the Supreme Court by not scheduling any hearings for Garland when President Obama had almost a year left in his term. What McConnell did was steal two Supreme Court picks from a current president and a future president by changing the the norm for his political gain. And I doubt very much people were asking this reporter if President Biden was going to stack the court. But here’s a question. Do you think McConnell was right to deny President Obama’s pick any hearings with almost a year left in his term while pushing through trump’s pick with just weeks before the presidential election was to take place? None of that which you have said, is relevant to this discussion. That thread was linked for iamkristinl16's benefit. She asked for examples of "but Trump". There are at least 30 to 40 in that thread. That is the only relevance to this thread. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Jul 7, 2022 17:28:05 GMT
I've long ago lost count of how many times posts about wrong-doing on the Left have been dismissed and excused with "as long as Trump exists I don't care what we do wrong" or some other form of "but Trump". I would like some examples. Even if people said that what a democrat did was not as bad as trump (which is usually true) I can’t think of any times where the majority of posters didn’t say the action was also wrong. On the other hand, when has a Republican here said what another Republican did was wrong? That doesn’t happen often. Just one example out of hundreds? thousands?: link |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Jul 7, 2022 17:26:06 GMT
Don't do that. An actual conversation can be had here if you don't resort to that kind of bs. Nah, man. You repeatedly refusing to answer a direct question is where it went off the rails. Sidestepping and pretending not to understand is the bullshit. Oh, cut the crap. YOU came in with a personal swipe. YOU made it personal. That was YOU, not me. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Jul 7, 2022 5:50:42 GMT
Just to clarify, is this quote a swipe at conservative Peas, or a swipe at conservative politicians? It's related to the Twitter thread that I posted. We've seen some conservative peas here claim that meanie liberals "made them" vote for Trump, even though they claim not to like him. We now see conservatives on Twitter claiming that liberals made the SC overturn Roe, that Obama made Trump run for president, etc., etc. What you posted in reply has no relation to what I asked, either on the board or out in the wide world. I'm talking about this abuser's mantra of "I know it's awful, but you made me do it." I don't really think it's that hard to understand. You say a conversation can be had, but you insist on trying to have a different conversation than the one I started. If you want to have that conversation, start your own thread. Well, in relation to your OP There ARE catalysts to an event. I don't agree with using it as a reason to not take responsibility for your actions. We are all responsible for our own actions. There were also some left news sources and entertainers that were pushing the idea that Obama and Seth Myers hurt Trumps feelings and that's why the thin-skinned, orange man ran for president. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Jul 7, 2022 0:54:58 GMT
But you didn't answer the question in the context in which it was presented, Gia. That's always been so difficult for you. Your pulling it out of context made it a different question, which was irrelevant to the point. Can you answer the question I actually asked? Don’t hold your breath. < This is where it goes off the rails. It doesn't go off the rails by disagreeing on topic. Don't do that. An actual conversation can be had here if you don't resort to that kind of bs. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Jul 7, 2022 0:50:29 GMT
You asked a question and people answered it. But you didn't answer the question in the context in which it was presented, Gia. That's always been so difficult for you. Your pulling it out of context made it a different question, which was irrelevant to the point. Can you answer the question I actually asked? Just to clarify, is this quote a swipe at conservative Peas, or a swipe at conservative politicians? |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Jul 7, 2022 0:21:23 GMT
I was speaking specifically to your statement: Which was related to the post, not just a one-off statement. So why bother? You asked a question and people answered it. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Jul 6, 2022 23:39:24 GMT
I've long ago lost count of how many times posts about wrong-doing on the Left have been dismissed and excused with "as long as Trump exists I don't care what we do wrong" or some other form of "but Trump". Did you read the thread I posted? Do you have any examples of liberals choosing to pass legislation/enact policies not because they believe it's good legislation, but because they want to stick it to the other side even at their own expense? Do you have examples of liberals passing universally harmful legislation and then blaming conservatives because the conservatives "made them do it?" Because that's what we're talking about here. Legislative revenge and they don't care who gets hurt as a result. I was speaking specifically to your statement: |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Jul 6, 2022 23:11:32 GMT
We've seen examples of this mentality here on this board over the past several years. What price personal responsibility, hm? I've long ago lost count of how many times posts about wrong-doing on the Left have been dismissed and excused with "as long as Trump exists I don't care what we do wrong" or some other form of "but Trump". |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Jul 6, 2022 22:33:12 GMT
If this girl is being arrested for peacefully, lawfully protesting and not something else, I'll stand right beside you in demanding justice for her. But once again it's a video only showing part of the incident. If they are arresting her for doing nothing but protesting, why are the other protesters not being arrested? She was arrested for using a bullhorn. If it was a problem, the officers couldn't find another way to resolve it? www.nbcmiami.com/multimedia/13-year-old-child-arrested-at-abortion-rights-protest-in-lakeland/2798904/Well, with the beginning of the incident not included in the video, we don't know if the police tried resolving it peacefully, or not. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Jul 6, 2022 22:30:38 GMT
I believe she was speaking about not having due process covered in red flag laws. Which could in fact, take guns away from law abiding citizens if due process and abuse of red flag laws is not included in those laws. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Jul 6, 2022 22:26:39 GMT
Biden has spoken to the wife of Brittany Griner by phone. He has also written a letter back to Brittany. Only after she got on television yesterday and called him out for not talking to her and not doing anything to get her wife back here. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Jul 6, 2022 11:31:37 GMT
Nope. Sure didn't. But do you honestly believe peas would think to do that? I have blocked several and moved on. They can continue to bitch among themselves when another pea leaves. I will never understand the nature of adults talking behind another back like that, spreading false lies, and turning their backs on someone obviously in a place of despair that so many have never been. It is a whole other level when you are fighting to keep a medically complex child alive, especially when they have e cheated death twice before. And when it is 2 children...I hope no one here has to ever experience that. The shit show opened my eyes to who truly cares and those who don't. Win win for me. And thank you to my IRL friend who alerted me to the shit being said. 💖 And all the peas who reached out to me when I came back. Nope. Sure didn't. But do you honestly believe peas would think to do that? Yeah, I honestly did/do. I thought for sure you'd say that the one who made the false accusation against you had messaged you and you talked and all was good. Even though I think the apology should be as public as the character assassination. It looks as though she hasn't been here in several days, so I still think she'll do the right thing when she does come back. I haven't paid THAT close attention, but it does seem to me that you all are basically aligned (thought wise) in a lot of ways, so this odd disagreement seems like a one off? You didn't deserve this and I still think or hope you'll work it out. I do hope you're feeling at least a bit less stressed since you've received the formula you needed, and I hope that this formula issue continues to be resolved. Hugs to you. |
|
|
|
Post by pixiechick on Jul 6, 2022 6:34:15 GMT
Wait, what?!?!? Not sure what I missed..... Why is she stating she would shoot her grandchildren if she really had to to save them? I'm pretty sure  ...she left out a lot of what she was actually thinking, and possibly whatever was said before her that we didn't get to hear, that she was responding to. I highly doubt the "them" she is talking about shooting is her grandchildren "in order to save her grandchildren". That doesn't even make sense on any level. |
|
...she left out a lot of what she was actually thinking, and possibly whatever was said before her that we didn't get to hear, that she was responding to.